Page 1 of 2 [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

06 Feb 2011, 5:28 am

Quote:
Image

Dr. Wakefield's study once showed a link between vaccinations and autism. Too bad it was based on fraudulent data and "an absolute lie". Bill Gates has pledged 10 billion dollars to make it the "year of the vaccines".

Specifically, Gates' $10 billion will be spread over 10 years. In an interview with Dr. Sanjay Gupta for CNN, Gates has some ideas on how to improve vaccination:

We have to do three things in parallel: Eradicate the few that fit that profile — ringworm and polio; get the coverage up for the vaccines we have; and then invent the vaccines — and we only need about six or seven more — and then you would have all the tools to reduce childhood death, reduce population growth, and everything — the stability, the environment — benefits from that.

As for the Jenny McCarthys of the world who stand against vaccines, well, he has some choice words for them as well.

"Well, Dr. Wakefield has been shown to have used absolutely fraudulent data. He had a financial interest in some lawsuits, he created a fake paper, the journal allowed it to run. All the other studies were done, showed no connection whatsoever again and again and again. So it's an absolute lie that has killed thousands of kids. Because the mothers who heard that lie, many of them didn't have their kids take either pertussis or measles vaccine, and their children are dead today. It's a very sad thing, because these vaccines are important.

I'm with Bill. Check out the whole Bill Gates interview at CNN. [CNN]


Via Gizmodo



Drapetomaniac
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 53

06 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm

Welllll. Strictly speaking vaccines have probably in deed killed thousands. They just saved far more people then they killed.



jmnixon95
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,931
Location: 미국

DeusMechanicus
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 54
Location: England (I prefer Mars)

15 Feb 2011, 2:54 pm

Bill Gates is not a Biochemist or a Medical expert - but he is a very wealthy man - and thus his opinion is given more validity than it deserves.



starygrrl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 795

15 Feb 2011, 3:31 pm

DeusMechanicus wrote:
Bill Gates is not a Biochemist or a Medical expert - but he is a very wealthy man - and thus his opinion is given more validity than it deserves.


But in this case he is dead on correct. The vaccine thing was dead on bad science, fake science indeed.



WorldsEdge
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 458
Location: Massachusetts

15 Feb 2011, 4:59 pm

starygrrl wrote:
DeusMechanicus wrote:
Bill Gates is not a Biochemist or a Medical expert - but he is a very wealthy man - and thus his opinion is given more validity than it deserves.


But in this case he is dead on correct. The vaccine thing was dead on bad science, fake science indeed.


Yeah, I think my favorite part of the whole Wakefield affair is that he never actually produced any evidence in the libel trial HE started. He just sent a letter saying he was dropping it, after trying to get delay after delay. Meaning he was also on the hook for the court costs of the defendants.


_________________
"The man who has fed the chicken every day throughout its life at last wrings its neck instead, showing that more refined views as to the uniformity of nature would have been useful to the chicken." ? Bertrand Russell


glider18
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: USA

20 Feb 2011, 3:05 pm

The vaccine debate will probably never die. I was born with oxygen deprivation and delivered by emergency C-section. I believe that contributed to my autism. But there is also a noticeable autism gene in my family. I personally believe it takes something to trigger the autism gene "on." I believe my problem birth triggered my gene to turn "on."

If a vaccine went bad (by allergic reaction or whatever) then it is plausible in my opinion that the allergic reaction could turn an autism gene "on." But...I do not believe vaccines cause autism directly.


_________________
"My journey has just begun."


cave_canem
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 378
Location: Canada

20 Feb 2011, 9:53 pm

It is unfortunate that Bill Gates is not considered "attractive" or "popular" by conventional social standards.

If he were (as apparently Jenny McCarthy is) more people would likely listen to him.



glider18
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: USA

20 Feb 2011, 10:01 pm

cave_canem wrote:
It is unfortunate that Bill Gates is not considered "attractive" or "popular" by conventional social standards.

If he were (as apparently Jenny McCarthy is) more people would likely listen to him.


Could his wealth and power make him unpopular by conventional standards?---especially in this day and age when the economy is tough for many of us.


_________________
"My journey has just begun."


MindBlind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 May 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,341

21 Feb 2011, 11:51 am

DeusMechanicus wrote:
Bill Gates is not a Biochemist or a Medical expert - but he is a very wealthy man - and thus his opinion is given more validity than it deserves.


Yes, but at least he's not a playboy model whose entire argument is based on emotion and willful ignorance. At least Gates is an educated man and understands how science works.



peterd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2006
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,347

22 Feb 2011, 7:24 am

Anyway, the reason we don't (didn't?) like Bill was his lifelong quest to own the world. He'd know as much about autism as any of us, wouldn't he?

I only say that because, on this issue, I agree with him.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

22 Feb 2011, 9:54 am

I think this is as harmful as Jenny McArthy's opinion, really - A immunology layman making a public statement as if he was an authority on the subject. More so, since his foundation has had very close ties to pharma, he is a way easy target for conspiracy theorists.

I'll prefer focusing on what Scientists and Doctors have said ever since Wakefield released his study. They are actually informed people on the topic and their opinion is more than enough. We don't need Bill Gates' "help" here.


_________________
.


Last edited by Vexcalibur on 25 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

SaNcheNuSS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 500

25 Feb 2011, 6:43 am

Or what about this? Bill gates is so wealthy. That he can create the diseases and the treatment for it. So let's say bill gates controlled the world. He would secretly create a disease that gets people sick, then he would come out openly years later and say, "Oh I have the vaccine for it". Why would anyone do this? Because that is how much money they have and they want to stay in Ultimate Power.



techn0teen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 663

25 Feb 2011, 9:29 pm

For people wondering, Bill Gates is commenting on this controversy because the Bill Gates and Melinda Foundation, I heard, helps give vaccinations to needy children. It is not because he is a doctor or anything. He knows that and hes not claiming that. Understand, this controversy touches very close to home for him. It is something he probably feels passionate about like I do.

The autism-vaccination link (which doesn't exist) is just disgusting. People in California, where I live, are developing things like whooping cough, swine flu, and chicken pox. Why? Because this downright lie makes people too afraid to vaccinate their children.



kate123A
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 536
Location: the twilight zone

25 Feb 2011, 10:05 pm

it's not that I don't trust them....BUT ok I don't trust them it's the very same agency that Assures us of vaccine safety has recalled a lot of things in recent years. Drugs. Beef, spinach, eggs, and various other things. Things that are "safe" but they are on a recall list. How exactly should I trust that that 5 vaccine cocktail is safe when I can't even trust that the eggs and beef in the store is not going to have bacteria? The FDA doesn't have a spotless reputation of keeping the public safe. Why yes we've tested it thoroughly it's safe but if that is the case why are there so many cases of Salmonella and other such things. Can I make the assumption that they are Fantastic and "all is well" when I can read about outbreaks of food poisoning? Umm these are the same people I don't think so but people don't go around saying "beef or eggs equal salmonella always" they know it's a bacteria in these products. Similarly there may be some unknown mechanism in those with a combined environmental or genetic factors that is of yet unknown.



cave_canem
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 378
Location: Canada

25 Feb 2011, 10:16 pm

I posted some of this on another forum, but I thought I'd re-post it here. This is in response to you, kate123A.

I believe it is important for people to look at BOTH sides of any debate with an open mind. I find that for many, especially parents of autistic children, the vaccination issue becomes such and emotional one that there is an inability to look at the facts objectively.

As a new mother, I can say that I can relate to the emotions involved - especially when it comes to wanting to keep your children safe. But we must remember that there are now parents out there mourning the loss of children to vaccine preventable illnesses (including infants who were too young to have been vaccinated) because of recent decreases in vaccination rates.

Saying that not vaccinating yourself or your children is a personal choice that does not impact others is simply false, and I think it is about time people accept this as a fact.

The statistics regarding autism rates increasing proves that the number of diagnosed cases of autism is increasing (I say diagnosed cases because diagnosis is, in and of itself, subjective). Why are autism rates increasing? We don't know yet. But scientists are certainly looking for reasons. To-date, vaccinations have not been shown to cause an increase in autism rates.

The statistics regarding the decline (and in some instances, elimiation) of diseases proves that vaccinations have been, and still are, effective. Recent outbreaks underline this, as it has shown what can happen when herd immunity is lost. This is a known scientific fact. Yes, there are potential risks associated with vaccination, but there are potential risks with any medication (have you ever read any of those inserts included with medication? any medication?). Also, there is a subset of the population who genuinely cannot tolerate vaccinations (due to underlying medical conditions, allergies, etc.), and herd immunity is what these people rely on to stay out of the path of vaccine-preventable diseases.

As for vaccinations overly stressing the immune system, I believe this argument is rubbish. When your immune system is busy fighting invaders you get a fever. How long, and how severe, are fevers associated with getting the flu? Measles? Diptheria? etc. Now, compare that to the severity and duration of fevers one might have after getting a vaccine.

One of the paradoxes of vaccines is that, the more effective they are, the less necessary they appear to be.

Vaccines have been so effective that many severe and debilitating illnesses are no longer a part of our cultural memory. If you doubt this, ask anyone who was born before the 1940's... aren't many of them left, are there? Or ask those who may have immigrated from less developed countries.

I for one hope we don't return to the days when families expected to loose one or more children to illness simply because the anti-vaccination movement gains enough traction with no conclusive studies to back it up.