Psalms 132:11; Isaiah 9:7; 11:1, 10
Continuing with our series of debates regarding Old Testament passages purported as prophecies that passages from the Gospels (or elsewhere in the New Testament) fulfilled concerning Jesus as the Messiah.
(http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt151898.html)
This will be the second in our series of debates. Again, I am using the Good News Translation, or GNT, which I think is the best.
First, the Old Testament Passages:
Psalms 132:11
a promise you will not take back:
I will make one of your sons king,
and he will rule after you.
Isaiah 9:7
his kingdom will always be at peace.
He will rule as King David's successor,
basing his power on right and justice,
from now until the end of time.
The Lord Almighty is determined to do all this.
Isaiah 11:1
Isaiah 11:10
The above passages are taken to indicate that Jesus was to be from the family of David, the son of Jesse, based upon the following New Testament passages:
Matthew
9:27 Jesus left that place, and as he walked along, two blind men started following him. "Have mercy on us, Son of David!" they shouted.
15:22 A Canaanite woman who lived in that region came to him. "Son of David!" she cried out. "Have mercy on me, sir! My daughter has a demon and is in a terrible condition."
20:30-31 Two blind men who were sitting by the road heard that Jesus was passing by, so they began to shout, "Son of David! Have mercy on us, sir!" The crowd scolded them and told them to be quiet. But they shouted even more loudly, "Son of David! Have mercy on us, sir!"
21:9 The crowds walking in front of Jesus and those walking behind began to shout, "Praise to David's Son! God bless him who comes in the name of the Lord! Praise be to God!"
21:15 The chief priests and the teachers of the Law became angry when they saw the wonderful things he was doing and the children shouting in the Temple, "Praise to David's Son!"
22:42 When some Pharisees gathered together, Jesus asked them, "What do you think about the Messiah? Whose descendant is he?"
"He is David's descendant", they answered.
Mark 10: 47-48
Luke
2. Joseph went from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to the town of Bethlehem in Judea, the birthplace of King David. Joseph went there because he was a descendant of David.5 He went to register with Mary, who was promised in marriage to him. She was pregnant,6 and while they were in Bethlehem, the time came for her to have her baby.
3. When Jesus began his work, he was about thirty years old. He was the son, so people thought, of Joseph, who was the son of Heli, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melchi, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph, the son of Mattathias, the son of Amos, the son of Nahum, the son of Esli, the son of Naggai, the son of Maath, the son of Mattathias, the son of Semein, the son of Josech, the son of Joda, the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel, the son of Neri, the son of Melchi, the son of Addi, the son of Cosam, the son of Elmadam, the son of Er, the son of Joshua, the son of Eliezer, the son of Jorim, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Simeon, the son of Judah, the son of Joseph, the son of Jonam, the son of Eliakim, the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David, the son of Jesse, etc. etc.
18. He cried out, "Jesus! Son of David! Have mercy on me!" The people in front scolded him and told him to be quiet. But he shouted even more loudly, "Son of David! Have mercy on me!"
Acts
13. It was Jesus, a descendant of David, whom God made the Savior of the people of Israel, as he had promised.
Romans
15: 12 And again, Isaiah says,"A descendant of Jesse will appear; he will come to rule the Gentiles, and they will put their hope in him."
So, what do you think? Did Psalms 132:11 and Isaiah 9 and 11 accurately predict that Jesus would be a descendent of David? Or what?
I don't THINK you got ruveyn's question. But a useful thing to know. I will go suck my thumb in the corner until it is done. As for your query and those upcoming in the series, asked and answered. Please move on, Counselor.
I think that Psalm 132:11 has already been fulfilled:
a promise you will not take back:
I will make one of your sons king,
and he will rule after you.
That would have been Solomon.
Looking a bit further into Isaiah 9:
have seen a great light.
They lived in a land of shadows,
but now light is shining on them.
You have given them great joy, Lord;
you have made them happy.
They rejoice in what you have done,
as people rejoice when they harvest grain
or when they divide captured wealth.
For you have broken the yoke that burdened them
and the rod that beat their shoulders.
You have defeated the nation
that oppressed and exploited your people,
just as you defeated the army of Midian long ago.
The boots of the invading army
and all their bloodstained clothing
will be destroyed by fire.
A child is born to us!
A son is given to us!
And he will be our ruler.
He will be called,
Wonderful Counselor,
Mighty God,
Eternal Father,
Prince of Peace.
His royal power will continue to grow;
his kingdom will always be at peace.
He will rule as King David's successor,
basing his power on right and justice,
from now until the end of time.
The Lord Almighty is determined to do all this.
There is a section where the Judeans are thrilled that the Assyrians have been defeated. Then, Isaiah seems to be talking about King Ahaz' son, who is to be named Immanuel. It seems like Isaiah is getting an eensy bit blasphemous--declaring that the kid is going to be called Mighty God and Eternal Father, and that he is going to rule from "now until the end of time."
I don't THINK you got ruveyn's question. But a useful thing to know. I will go suck my thumb in the corner until it is done. As for your query and those upcoming in the series, asked and answered. Please move on, Counselor.
Given that our Jehovah's Witness has already conceded, there probably isn't any point in continuing the series. Especially if no one else wants to enter the fray on his behalf.
no, Jesus was only related to David through Joseph and he has no blood relation to Joseph because Joseph isnt his real father and if he has no blood relation to Joseph he has no blood relation to David meaning he cant be descended from David
_________________
WP Strident Atheist
If you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, have accepted him as your lord and savior, and are 100% proud of it, put this in your sig.
I don't THINK you got ruveyn's question. But a useful thing to know. I will go suck my thumb in the corner until it is done. As for your query and those upcoming in the series, asked and answered. Please move on, Counselor.
Given that our Jehovah's Witness has already conceded, there probably isn't any point in continuing the series. Especially if no one else wants to enter the fray on his behalf.
Well, most of the Christians here are quite timid with their arguments.
So, you're admitting defeat and accepting that your system of beliefs is false, I take it?
Back in the old days, all that mattered was paternal ancestry. Hence the Bible only lists male lineages for characters. If Mary was descended from David, it made no difference. Jesus' stepfather, Joseph, seems to have been a direct descendant of David. However, Jesus is the Son of God, and not the son of Joseph. Furthermore, Jesus never ruled over any Gentiles.
Hence, if the Jewish messiah was to be a descendent of David, then Jesus certainly did not fill the bill.
If you look at 1 Chronicles 22
It appears that the Jewish messiah should be a descendent of Solomon. Luke says that Jesus was not a descendent of Solomon, but rather one of David's other sons, specifically Nathan.
Okay.
I will say it.
I hear tapping on the roof at 4:15 PM.
I look out the window - it seems to be raining. My wife yells I should help get the clothes off the line. I step out, big drops plash on my specs.
I deduce it is raining.
We bring the clothes in and sit down. Outside puddles are forming, drops lash the window panes.
I pick up the paper. The weather forecast - sunny with light breezes all day. I frown. Some meteorologist. I turn on the radio. A cheery voice tells me it is a beautiful partly cloudy day. I turn it off.
Now, my dear Panda, which should I do:
Say that it is raining and that the prophecies are "all wet"?
Or say the forecasts prove that it can NOT be raining?
If you need forecasts to tell if it is raining, you do not know what rain is.
If you need prophecies to decide who Jesus is, you don't know him.