Illuminati pyramid and the UFO? Does the Goa'uld are real?
[sarcasm]
Your first mistake was watching the Discovery channel. Everybody knows that only the History channel is worth watching.
Better yet, the Cartoon network is really the way to go.
[/sarcasm]
The pyramids were built by human labor over a period of about 100 years each. Yes, it is possible to move 20-ton blocks of stone over many miles using human muscle power. Yes, it is possible to dress those stones on-site to make them fit together almost perfectly. Yes, it is possible for a society to dedicate itself over several generations to one task.
There is no need to imagine intervention by gods, extraterrestrials, Atlanteans, or magic. There exists NO VALID, EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT PROVES OTHERWISE!
The pyramids are human artifacts; only this, and nothing more.
_________________
lostonearth35
Veteran
Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,784
Location: Lost on Earth, waddya think?
I find most of the shows on both the History AND Discovery are terrible now. I used to call History the Hitler channel like most other cynical people, but now I think it should be called the PawnApaocalypsePropaganda channel. The only thing on it that I like right now is a new show about the "secret lives" of people like King Henry the 8th and Queen Victoria and such. I actually learned that Victoria wasn't always the overweight prude she is always shown as being in paintings and such, when she was young she was actually petite, thin, and very vibrant. And not prudish at all, she had at least 10 kids with her husband! But then her husband, I think his name was Alexander, got really sick and died and she became very depressed and put on a lot of weight and she did some kind of creepy things like have a cast made of her husband's cold dead hand and sleep with it at night. And then later she fell in love with another man but convinced herself he was actually the reincarnation of her late husband so she wouldn't feel guilty for cheating on his ghost, lol. King Henry wasn't always an obese, wife-beheading tyrant either, but I knew that already. But I digress. The only shows on Discovery I actually like are Dirty Jobs, Mythbusters and How It's Made but I hardly ever watch them anymore.
Last edited by lostonearth35 on 10 Nov 2012, 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Your first mistake was watching the Discovery channel. Everybody knows that only the History channel is worth watching.
Better yet, the Cartoon network is really the way to go.
[/sarcasm]
The pyramids were built by human labor over a period of about 100 years each. Yes, it is possible to move 20-ton blocks of stone over many miles using human muscle power. Yes, it is possible to dress those stones on-site to make them fit together almost perfectly. Yes, it is possible for a society to dedicate itself over several generations to one task.
There is no need to imagine intervention by gods, extraterrestrials, Atlanteans, or magic. There exists NO VALID, EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT PROVES OTHERWISE!
The pyramids are human artifacts; only this, and nothing more.
I've always been wondering, however, why they made such a huge effort for a tomb. Although my sister told me a lot about that culture since she's much interested in it, knows all the pharao/their families and almost everything about their culture, I never got this point.
I mean, sure, they did believe that the deceased pharao would come back to life someplace and sometime. So far so good. But why would this take such a splendid building as a pyramid and the grind of generations? Wouldn't a somewhat luxurious tomb fulfill the same purpose?
To them, a man-god so great as Pharoah deserved a tomb that would last for eternity, and dedicating their lives to building that tomb was their way of buying their place into the afterlife.
Sorta like when European kings and queens would donate money to build elaborate Christian cathedrals during the Middle Ages - they were "buying insurance" to get themselves into Heaven when they died.
_________________
Sorta like when European kings and queens would donate money to build elaborate Christian cathedrals during the Middle Ages - they were "buying insurance" to get themselves into Heaven when they died.
That makes sense, thank you for the explanation. So far as I know the Middle Ages were a period of time where disease and death could basically lurk around the next corner and there was no feeling of security and continuity in the way we know it nowadays, hence people wanted to make sure they would survive the physical dead anyway.
Pyrite
Veteran
Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,247
Location: Mid-Atlantic United States
Your first mistake was watching the Discovery channel. Everybody knows that only the History channel is worth watching.
Better yet, the Cartoon network is really the way to go.
[/sarcasm]
The pyramids were built by human labor over a period of about 100 years each. Yes, it is possible to move 20-ton blocks of stone over many miles using human muscle power. Yes, it is possible to dress those stones on-site to make them fit together almost perfectly. Yes, it is possible for a society to dedicate itself over several generations to one task.
There is no need to imagine intervention by gods, extraterrestrials, Atlanteans, or magic. There exists NO VALID, EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT PROVES OTHERWISE!
The pyramids are human artifacts; only this, and nothing more.
I disagree with your sarcastic point, in fact the makers of the History Channel's "Ancient Aliens" program would most likely corroborate the Discovery Channel's nonsense, albeit without increasing it's credibility.
Sorta like when European kings and queens would donate money to build elaborate Christian cathedrals during the Middle Ages - they were "buying insurance" to get themselves into Heaven when they died.
I think it's about a bit more than a tomb. I've heard a theory that suggested the king's chamber was a place where people would meditate. They would supposedly use the stone box as a sensory deprivation chamber. They say the egyptians were big into the "new age" stuff back then. In fact, there's a temple in egypt that has the flower of life pattern on it somewhere, but it's not carved or chiseled. It was put there by some unknown means, and it seems to be totally unaffected by erosion.
Also, what's interesting is those really long "air shafts." Back when they were built, they supposedly pointed directly to sirius and thuban.
Also, what's really interesting is the sphynx has marks on it consistent with water erosion, which would suggest that it was built before the people we know as the ancient egyptians were there. Supposedly it's a giant statue of Leo the Lion, and it faced the constellation at the time when it was built. It was modified by the people we know as the ancient egyptians. That would explain why its head is disproportionately small.
Then the Disney channel will make a movie featuring Jimmy Kimmel as a doofus dad trying to cope with his alien stepson.
Suggestions are not proof.
Rumors are not proof.
Link please? I know of no such temple.
Suppositions are not proof.
The Great Sphinx was built over a yardang - a limestone rock that had already undergone significant erosion by wind-borne sand. While most available evidence seems to indicate that the Great Sphinx was built by ancient Egyptians of the Old Kingdom during the reign of the Pharaoh Khafra (c. 2558–2532 BC), there is still considerable debate over how to interpret the data.
The Orion correlation theory is based on the supposed correlation of the three pyramids at Giza with the three stars forming Orion's Belt, in the relative positions occupied by these stars in 10,500 BCE. The argument goes that the geographic relationship of the Sphinx, the Giza pyramids and the Nile directly corresponds with Leo, Orion and the Milky Way respectively. Note that the Sphinx does not point to Leo, but that it's positions relative to the Giza pyramids and the Nile may resemble the positions of Leo, Orion and the Milky Way. This theory is "at variance" ("disagrees") with mainstream scholarship.
_________________
Then the Disney channel will make a movie featuring Jimmy Kimmel as a doofus dad trying to cope with his alien stepson.
Suggestions are not proof.
Rumors are not proof.
Link please? I know of no such temple.
Suppositions are not proof.
The Great Sphinx was built over a yardang - a limestone rock that had already undergone significant erosion by wind-borne sand. While most available evidence seems to indicate that the Great Sphinx was built by ancient Egyptians of the Old Kingdom during the reign of the Pharaoh Khafra (c. 2558–2532 BC), there is still considerable debate over how to interpret the data.
The Orion correlation theory is based on the supposed correlation of the three pyramids at Giza with the three stars forming Orion's Belt, in the relative positions occupied by these stars in 10,500 BCE. The argument goes that the geographic relationship of the Sphinx, the Giza pyramids and the Nile directly corresponds with Leo, Orion and the Milky Way respectively. Note that the Sphinx does not point to Leo, but that it's positions relative to the Giza pyramids and the Nile may resemble the positions of Leo, Orion and the Milky Way. This theory is "at variance" ("disagrees") with mainstream scholarship.
I never said ANY of that was "proof," I was just stating some possibilities. The truth is we have no way of really knowing what the pyramids were for without going back in time.
http://ancientaliens.wordpress.com/2011 ... on-temple/
Sorry, the temple had nothing to do with Isis, but supposedly Osiris's head is buried there. That same symbol appears all over the ancient world, by the way. It's a sort of algorithm for how things get created. In fact, a human embryo, as it begins to grow, creates the seed of life, which is part of the flower of life pattern.
http://worldtruth.tv/the-mystery-of-flo ... -geometry/
I want to start this reply with something from http://worldtruth.tv/the-mystery-of-flo ... -geometry/
As a viking-descendent (the guys who used this alphabeth) I am feeling offended by this, since this "flower of life" has nothing to do with the culture of my ancestors, and it does by the way not look like the "flower" at all.
The people ("people" is a term I use very losely, by the way) that wrote these things, are finding the runes in this picture by ignoring other parts of the pattorn. In other words, they see wht they want to see.
Like in this example:
I mean what about all the other lines in this pattern?
I repeat: what about the rest of this pattern.
While i am at it:
The part of this pattern that has been coloured yellow fits with the stone circel itself because it has been expanded to fit the picture. But what about the white circels that shows the embankments around stonehenge, which do not seem to fit into the pattern
_________________
Reality is an illusion.
Last edited by Exploronaut on 19 Nov 2012, 1:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
Part 2 of my reply
What grid? Where does these guys get this ... "information" from?
I don't think that comments are necessary on these.
The reason for why many cultures (many which did not know about how embryos where foremed) has used this pattern, in my opinion, is of the same reason why many cultures has shared an interest for triangels, circles, spirals and pi: An interest in mathematics, which all advanced cultures have had in common.
Oh my God, I need to get a life
_________________
Reality is an illusion.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Is this Real? |
26 Mar 2024, 4:15 pm |
Not meme. Real: |
16 Jan 2024, 6:03 am |
Cheer Up! | Real Time with Bill Maher |
16 Mar 2024, 1:11 pm |
The REAL reason why I have developed feelings for SpongeBob! |
08 Mar 2024, 6:36 pm |