Norton 360 vs Kaspersky?
Kaspersky has a good reputation, Norton not so good. Kaspersky came with a free trial pre loaded on my Windows 8.1 computer but it is due to expire soon. At that time I'll just uninstall it and switch to Microsoft Essentials which is free.
I dislike Avast as it gives too many false positives for my liking - I got into a wrestling match with it on another machine and in the end it had to go. If you have a lot of custom software, (not used by many people), it tends to err on the side of treating it all as unsafe and stick it in the virus vault. Any software it doesn't recognise gets treated thus. I got sick of telling it that my software isn't a virus and continually fishing it out of the bloody virus vault. I tried to tell it that it was safe but it took me to a website demanding a form be filled with the software publisher's name, website, blah, blah, fuc*ing blah. Screw Avast.
_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.
Norton is garbage. Always has been, always will be.
Every antivirus slowdown computer, but which one is better, does Norton slow down computer more than Kaspersky?
Norton is garbage. Always has been, always will be.
Every antivirus slowdown computer, but which one is better, does Norton slow down computer more than Kaspersky?
Kaspersky slows it down more. A lot, lot more. The real-time protection it provides is VERY good but its like it literally stops the CPU processes constantly to 'check' every single file the computer uses.
To put it in simple terms: With Kaspersky protection it takes about 10 seconds to load MS WORD. Without it loads in less than 1 second.
Good protection but... its irritating.
Norton is garbage. Always has been, always will be.
Every antivirus slowdown computer, but which one is better, does Norton slow down computer more than Kaspersky?
Kaspersky slows it down more. A lot, lot more. The real-time protection it provides is VERY good but its like it literally stops the CPU processes constantly to 'check' every single file the computer uses.
To put it in simple terms: With Kaspersky protection it takes about 10 seconds to load MS WORD. Without it loads in less than 1 second.
Good protection but... its irritating.
Than, which antivirus provides complete protection and at the same time does not slow down computer?
I dislike Avast as it gives too many false positives for my liking - I got into a wrestling match with it on another machine and in the end it had to go. If you have a lot of custom software, (not used by many people), it tends to err on the side of treating it all as unsafe and stick it in the virus vault. Any software it doesn't recognise gets treated thus. I got sick of telling it that my software isn't a virus and continually fishing it out of the bloody virus vault. I tried to tell it that it was safe but it took me to a website demanding a form be filled with the software publisher's name, website, blah, blah, fuc*ing blah. Screw Avast.
Most modern anti-virus programs use heuristics, and they're never really failsafe. The heuristics sensitivity can be adjusted in Avast. It's never given me any false positives on anything I've programmed, although I mostly use high level languages when programming in Windows.
_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”
As a tech I agree whole-heartedly with this.
Avast!, even the free version, is currently the best, and its boot time scan gets out crap those other two can't even touch.
You might want to get a free firewall along with it, but its really great & keeping your (crappy, insecure) Windows box safe.
...or you could just delete the Windows virus infecting your machine, install Linux, and stop worry about that crap.
I dislike Avast as it gives too many false positives for my liking - I got into a wrestling match with it on another machine and in the end it had to go. If you have a lot of custom software, (not used by many people), it tends to err on the side of treating it all as unsafe and stick it in the virus vault. Any software it doesn't recognise gets treated thus. I got sick of telling it that my software isn't a virus and continually fishing it out of the bloody virus vault. I tried to tell it that it was safe but it took me to a website demanding a form be filled with the software publisher's name, website, blah, blah, fuc*ing blah. Screw Avast.
Most modern anti-virus programs use heuristics, and they're never really failsafe. The heuristics sensitivity can be adjusted in Avast. It's never given me any false positives on anything I've programmed, although I mostly use high level languages when programming in Windows.
^This! I have programmed for a living and use a wide range of software some of it obscure due to the market share, cost, etc. Once I have set Avast as described above, it works fine. I have yet to get a false positive! And of ALL the packages I have tried, it seems to offer the lowest hit on performance unlike Norton and others. I now use the paid version on ALL my systems and Android platforms. They have a free one which is nearly just as good. It all boils down to preference I suppose but Norton would be the LAST I would ever consider! In all the years I have had Avast I have only ever gotten one infection, a trojan. And it was my fault as I had disabled Avast on something I was programming and it was mucking with the ports. Dumb me forgot to re-enable it afterwards and boom! That fast online and I was infected...