LoveNotHate wrote:
You can't trust anyone, so yeah you can't trust science .... how far are you willing to go to believe ...
Cigarettes were once ?physician? tested, approved
http://www.healio.com/hematology-oncolo ... d-approvedVaccines make you gay
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/0 ... 92953.htmlGian Paolo Vanoli, a 70-year-old Italian scientist, claimed that vaccines are causing homosexuality.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) issued an ominous warning to all expecting mothers.
"The latest scientific evidence shows that the sons of pregnant women who consume chicken are more likely to have
smaller penises because of a chemical found in the birds? flesh."
http://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/p ... penis-sizeNigerian Scientist Uses Magnets to Prove Gay Marriage Is Wrong
http://io9.com/nigerian-grad-student-us ... 1326215449"means that man cannot attract another man because they are the same, and a woman should not attract a woman because they are the same."
Researchers publish Big Foot genome
http://io9.com/5984205/researchers-publ ... es-foundedAnimal Planet: Mermaids exist
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/351217Do I even need to cite all the times that scientists have claimed to have proven "cold fusion"?
Let's see: were any of those published through a reputable journal and did any of them undergo a rigorous peer review process? It's not the fault of the legitimate scientist that people who consume such material don't know how to distinguish between critical and mediocre material. And it's not as if they haven't been pointing this out for some time now. I mean really: "publish bigfoot genome in
brand new journal they themselves founded". That's one
strong indictment against scientists because we all know that they just come up with new journals on the spot and publish it themselves without submitting their work to peer review
Not to mention that one of the main reasons for the peer review process is that the experts participating in the review will not necessarily all have the same opinion, ergo their primary concern is the quality of research methodology and not so much the conclusions themselves.
_________________
There is no wealth like knowledge, no poverty like ignorance.
Nahj ul-Balāgha by Ali bin Abu-Talib