NT/Aspie Girls- Does intelligence mean anything romantically

Page 1 of 4 [ 51 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

AutisticMalcontent
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 29 May 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 459

21 Dec 2008, 2:39 am

I ask this out of curiousity mostly, because I'm not a good judge of what women think romantically. It would stupid to make assumptions when I can merely ask you girls informally.


All my life, I've been isolated from my peers, socially and maturity wise. I have learned a lot of stuff about various subjects over the years (trivia, knowing about historical events and cultures, psychological models of behavior, how to speak decent German, reading books about dystopias and other subjects, etc.) Even today, I speak with vocabulary that leaves most people dumbfounded. I don't say it to be pompous, it's just part of my vocabulary.

I have many interests that could be percieved as intellectual in nature. However, although I have amassed all this knowledge, I question whether being intelligent has any direct correlation with being considered attractive. I have my own hypothesis about intelligence in the romantic sense, and these are just my observations.

From the futility of my efforts in dating in real life combined with the failure of my attempts through dating sites, I honestly believe being intelligent is a handicap romantically. I reason that most girls typically don't want an overly intelligent/complex guy, because a guy too intelligent might either intimidate, annoy, or confuse them to the point where the guy's attractive appeal is total demolished. I also think that almost all women view things on an emotional level, as opposed to a logical level, which is the exact opposite of viewing things rationally. I'm NOT saying that women are devoid of rationality, I'm just saying I think most women's gut instinct is to react to a stimulus emotionally before resorting to rationale.

I also reason that many people were not raised with the same understanding of certain intellectual subjects, like various occurences in history, psychology, science, etc. I think most people become so acclimated to the social norms of their culture that they forget anything else that they might deem unesscary. For instance, I could probably ask almost any girl (or a guy for that matter) if she/he knew the capital of South Korea (Seoul), or the name of the conquistador who conquered the Aztecs (Hernando Cortez), and I bet she/he wouldn't have a clue. However, if I asked something more culturally based or media driven, she/he could answer that in a heartbeat. Thus, intelligence often has an isolating condition to it socially or romantically.

These are my observations, however, I'd like to hear what you girls think. Thanks!



violet_yoshi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,297

21 Dec 2008, 2:55 am

I agree with you.



NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

21 Dec 2008, 3:09 am

I think you're making a few typically aspie presumptions here. First, you're conflating knowledge, or really a litany of facts, with intelligence. Second, you are mistaking mere intelligence or knowledge for something more existential. Intelligence is just the ability to adapt to one's environment. The rote memorization of esoteric facts may be interesting if you have Asperger's syndrome, but it really won't captivate a woman at all (with very rare exceptions possibly). If a woman wanted facts, she'd get an encyclopedia; if she wanted logic, she'd use a computer; if she wanted a lecture, she'd take a class. You need to use your intelligence to adapt to what women want. Make yourself more personable, spontaneous, and interesting. Instead of reading about, thinking about, and talking about concepts and the goings-on of life, maybe you should stop intellectualizing and start living. An analytical approach is appropriate in some situations, but you need to break out of the aspie fallbacks of the comforting routine and cold fact. If only for your own sake, getting some new, less bookish interests can only make you a more well-rounded, more fulfilled person; of course, it isn't stopping you from enjoying solitary, more esoteric pursuits with the rest of your time.

Of course, you were asking for women, but hey, at least as an aspie guy, I know this much about women.



Shiggily
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,317

21 Dec 2008, 4:10 am

NeantHumain wrote:
I think you're making a few typically aspie presumptions here. First, you're conflating knowledge, or really a litany of facts, with intelligence. Second, you are mistaking mere intelligence or knowledge for something more existential. Intelligence is just the ability to adapt to one's environment. The rote memorization of esoteric facts may be interesting if you have Asperger's syndrome, but it really won't captivate a woman at all (with very rare exceptions possibly). If a woman wanted facts, she'd get an encyclopedia; if she wanted logic, she'd use a computer; if she wanted a lecture, she'd take a class. You need to use your intelligence to adapt to what women want. Make yourself more personable, spontaneous, and interesting. Instead of reading about, thinking about, and talking about concepts and the goings-on of life, maybe you should stop intellectualizing and start living. An analytical approach is appropriate in some situations, but you need to break out of the aspie fallbacks of the comforting routine and cold fact. If only for your own sake, getting some new, less bookish interests can only make you a more well-rounded, more fulfilled person; of course, it isn't stopping you from enjoying solitary, more esoteric pursuits with the rest of your time.

Of course, you were asking for women, but hey, at least as an aspie guy, I know this much about women.


concur except for the logic part, I might seek out a mathematician.

but my list of desirable qualities included genius level IQ and degrees in math and/or science, and not social skills or great looks (though I like them).


so... I am probably not a good person to ask this question to.



ntchick
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 41

21 Dec 2008, 4:35 am

Hi,

Intelligence is one of the things that's really important to me in a partner, or even in friendship. I don't expect the person I am conversing with to have the same knowledge base as me, otherwise the conversation would be boring and no new input would be generated. If I hold a conversation, I most enjoy those with people with equal or greater intelligence than myself, because I love to learn things.

Intelligence is not about what you know, but how you process things. Wisdom is different, as is sensing the flow of a conversation and when it's the right time to say certain things, which seems to be where aspies fall over socially. It's possible that what may isolate you is not that you are intelligent, but the times at which you choose to talk about the capital of South Korea (which, incidentally, I do have no idea of [is it Seoul?], but if you brought it up in conversation i would be very interested to hear about).

My beautiful man who I adore very much has the habit of talking about Transformers when I'm spilling my guts emotionally, and doesn't realise that it hurts me because it makes me feel as though he's not listening and doesn't care. Really he does care, but his Asperger's doesn't allow him to stop thinking for long enough to say "yes, baby, I understand." or something of that ilk - he just goes on to the next thing spinning around in his thoughts.

So it's timing and the art of conversation that may be the issue rather than your intelligence.

That's my opinion. Hope it helps you out.



AutisticMalcontent
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 29 May 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 459

21 Dec 2008, 1:23 pm

NeantHumain wrote:
I think you're making a few typically aspie presumptions here. First, you're conflating knowledge, or really a litany of facts, with intelligence. Second, you are mistaking mere intelligence or knowledge for something more existential. Intelligence is just the ability to adapt to one's environment. The rote memorization of esoteric facts may be interesting if you have Asperger's syndrome, but it really won't captivate a woman at all (with very rare exceptions possibly). If a woman wanted facts, she'd get an encyclopedia; if she wanted logic, she'd use a computer; if she wanted a lecture, she'd take a class. You need to use your intelligence to adapt to what women want. Make yourself more personable, spontaneous, and interesting. Instead of reading about, thinking about, and talking about concepts and the goings-on of life, maybe you should stop intellectualizing and start living. An analytical approach is appropriate in some situations, but you need to break out of the aspie fallbacks of the comforting routine and cold fact. If only for your own sake, getting some new, less bookish interests can only make you a more well-rounded, more fulfilled person; of course, it isn't stopping you from enjoying solitary, more esoteric pursuits with the rest of your time.

Of course, you were asking for women, but hey, at least as an aspie guy, I know this much about women.


Reluctantly noted, however I'm pleased you put your own advice into this, because you made perfect sense in what you said. I really hate to admit it, but you're right, being full of various facts and theories is a bit off-putting to girls. I believe there are degrees of intelligence- like emotional intelligence, street smarts, common sense, and book intelligence. Unfortunately it seems that having a bunch of knowledge of facts and figures in your repertoire does do much for attracting women.

You said "Make yourself more personable, spontaneous, and interesting". I believe you're trying to say I should adapt my intelligence to the emotional level for clearer understanding by women. So in esscense, you are saying I should abandon my facts and figures to become less formal and more sociable with women, paying particular attention to the emotional/comfort aspect of knowledge? It is a sad day when I have to actually abandon my "litany of facts" and books smarts to appeal to the simpler tastes of women. It's little wonder why almost all (but not all) of them like knuckleheads and guys with overly inflated egos, they can converse with them on rudimentary terms, like emotions and social events, as opposed to intellectual knowledge.

In truth, this is my annoyance, I believe there is a progression of attraction concerning romance or courtship. I think it goes something like this:

Physical Attraction --> Charisma/Personality --> Intelligence

This is my "theory" of physical attraction. It is kind of like Maslow's Hierachy of Needs. I believe that physical attraction must established first and foremost. If not, I believe you can't progress to the possibility of interacting on a charm/personality based level. I think intelligence comes last, and is generally superfolous to the whole equation, it is not imperative to be that intelligent in relationships. The first two things appeal to women on an emotional level, and if you don't appeal on this level, you won't progress romantically at all. It's game over at either physical attraction or personality if you don't fit the bill. That's just what I think.



AutisticMalcontent
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 29 May 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 459

21 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm

Shiggily wrote:
NeantHumain wrote:
I think you're making a few typically aspie presumptions here. First, you're conflating knowledge, or really a litany of facts, with intelligence. Second, you are mistaking mere intelligence or knowledge for something more existential. Intelligence is just the ability to adapt to one's environment. The rote memorization of esoteric facts may be interesting if you have Asperger's syndrome, but it really won't captivate a woman at all (with very rare exceptions possibly). If a woman wanted facts, she'd get an encyclopedia; if she wanted logic, she'd use a computer; if she wanted a lecture, she'd take a class. You need to use your intelligence to adapt to what women want. Make yourself more personable, spontaneous, and interesting. Instead of reading about, thinking about, and talking about concepts and the goings-on of life, maybe you should stop intellectualizing and start living. An analytical approach is appropriate in some situations, but you need to break out of the aspie fallbacks of the comforting routine and cold fact. If only for your own sake, getting some new, less bookish interests can only make you a more well-rounded, more fulfilled person; of course, it isn't stopping you from enjoying solitary, more esoteric pursuits with the rest of your time.

Of course, you were asking for women, but hey, at least as an aspie guy, I know this much about women.


concur except for the logic part, I might seek out a mathematician.

but my list of desirable qualities included genius level IQ and degrees in math and/or science, and not social skills or great looks (though I like them).


so... I am probably not a good person to ask this question to.



hmmmmm. But then again, I go back to my theory listed below. I think unless a guy attracts you physically first and then personality wise/charisma wise secondly, you probably won't know the level of his intelligence, or be interested it. I believe you have to appeal to a woman physically and personality wise before anything else can occur, because these two things satisfy women's interest in you. Why else do women date extraverted guys or physically attractive guys. It isn't because they are brainiacs, it is because they appeal to women on an emotional level, as opposed to a logical one. If logic/intelligence held ANY importance romantically, nerds would be picking up girls like they were nothing important.

Why is it so easy for guys to be manipulative romantically? Because women trust them on an emotional level. I believe the whole female circuitry is based on emotional intelligence, and not logic or reason. Look at everytime a girl is cheated on and dumped by her bf. She wonders "Why did he dump me, I thought he cared about me so much, and I really did love him". She doesn't think "Well he dumped me because he found another girl who he thought was more physically attractive than me, and that is why I'm single again." Presumptious, of course. Logical on my part, of course. Case closed :P



LePetitPrince
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,464

21 Dec 2008, 1:57 pm

AutisticMalcontent wrote:
I ask this out of curiousity mostly, because I'm not a good judge of what women think romantically. It would stupid to make assumptions when I can merely ask you girls informally.


All my life, I've been isolated from my peers, socially and maturity wise. I have learned a lot of stuff about various subjects over the years (trivia, knowing about historical events and cultures, psychological models of behavior, how to speak decent German, reading books about dystopias and other subjects, etc.) Even today, I speak with vocabulary that leaves most people dumbfounded. I don't say it to be pompous, it's just part of my vocabulary.

I have many interests that could be percieved as intellectual in nature. However, although I have amassed all this knowledge, I question whether being intelligent has any direct correlation with being considered attractive. I have my own hypothesis about intelligence in the romantic sense, and these are just my observations.

From the futility of my efforts in dating in real life combined with the failure of my attempts through dating sites, I honestly believe being intelligent is a handicap romantically. I reason that most girls typically don't want an overly intelligent/complex guy, because a guy too intelligent might either intimidate, annoy, or confuse them to the point where the guy's attractive appeal is total demolished. I also think that almost all women view things on an emotional level, as opposed to a logical level, which is the exact opposite of viewing things rationally. I'm NOT saying that women are devoid of rationality, I'm just saying I think most women's gut instinct is to react to a stimulus emotionally before resorting to rationale.

I also reason that many people were not raised with the same understanding of certain intellectual subjects, like various occurences in history, psychology, science, etc. I think most people become so acclimated to the social norms of their culture that they forget anything else that they might deem unesscary. For instance, I could probably ask almost any girl (or a guy for that matter) if she/he knew the capital of South Korea (Seoul), or the name of the conquistador who conquered the Aztecs (Hernando Cortez), and I bet she/he wouldn't have a clue. However, if I asked something more culturally based or media driven, she/he could answer that in a heartbeat. Thus, intelligence often has an isolating condition to it socially or romantically.

These are my observations, however, I'd like to hear what you girls think. Thanks!


Intelligence is not very important for romance, good looks and entertainment value (ps. singer) are the most attractive qualities in men. My best living proof is living with me in the office , the new coworker isn't that smart but he has the great looks and talents , there are only 3 young girls in the whole companies and the 3 of them are hitting on him , one of them went with him to lunch several times and the other always joking about wanting to move to my department and the other is just flirting him because her bf works in the company.

Obviously that the bard type of men are the most attractive to most women while the magicians are usually the least attractive .

from the non-ending alpha thread:


Quote:
For a better help ,note that there are basically FOUR types of Alpha males in the current human society:

-The Knight (Strength): These are basically the pure natural alphas , the men with high level of Testosterone , the strong, tall , determinant , confident , masculine and handsome men. If you are not already one of those , it will be almost impossible to become one. A strong sport man who can achieve big wins can becomes a King/Knight (ie: the best footballers).This type of alpha might fade with age or can transform to the King type


-The King (Wealth/Social Power): The Kings are the successful men who can turn their success into great wealth and social power, this type of Alpha requires also some basic natural alpha traits found in the Knight-type like confidence and determination (ie.CEOs, great businessmen...etc) ...good physical traits might help too , it also requires mainly traits such as leadership, common sense, courage and good social skills. It is not impossible for Aspies to be one of those but keep in mind that without good-developed natural skills such as social skills and leadership that won't be easy at all.


-The Magician (High Intelligence): Naturally,this is the least attractive Alpha type to most females but they are alphas nonetheless and can attract 10% of females at least. The Magicians are the men who can achieve great things using their high intelligence ,education , great knowledge or great wisdom , the requirement for this type is one : High IQ/Intelligence or at least 1 useful savant skill(rare cases). The Magician doesn't need to be physically strong, confident or leader or any of that sort ....he just needs to be very smart in his field he works in. A Magician who can turns his achievements to success and wealth can becomes a Magician/King (ie. Bill Gates). Aspies with high intelligence should choose this path to Alphahood but if you don't naturally have a very high IQ (above 130)/intelligence or at least 1 useful savant skill this would be almost impossible.

(Even a physically handicapped very genius man such as Steven hawking can be considered as a Magician alpha because his natural high intelligence compensates all the other bad genes ..but of course this case is very very exceptional.)


- The Bard (Talent/Fame): The Bards are the people who get fame through their high talents ie: good singers, cool hardrockers,Hollywood actors, good musicians, excellent painters...

The Bards are the MOST attractive Alpha-type to females nowadays , they can harvest thousands of females' hearts.
Since fame brings wealth and since fame requires sometimes attractive looks then Bards are usually in combo forms mostly as Bard/King or sometimes in Bard/King/Knight , Bard/King/Magician exist but are rare cases (ie. like the savant pianist kids that can even compete adult pianists....will be Bard/King/Magician when they become adults).
Aspie can becomes a bard ....but of course he needs to have great talents.


There are the same types of alphas among females ....but here we are talking about competition between males which is much rougher than the competition between females (competition between females is caused by the artificial monogamous marriage system).



Zane
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 347
Location: Tempe, Arizona

21 Dec 2008, 2:33 pm

NeantHumain wrote:
I think you're making a few typically aspie presumptions here. First, you're conflating knowledge, or really a litany of facts, with intelligence. Second, you are mistaking mere intelligence or knowledge for something more existential. Intelligence is just the ability to adapt to one's environment. The rote memorization of esoteric facts may be interesting if you have Asperger's syndrome, but it really won't captivate a woman at all (with very rare exceptions possibly). If a woman wanted facts, she'd get an encyclopedia; if she wanted logic, she'd use a computer; if she wanted a lecture, she'd take a class. You need to use your intelligence to adapt to what women want. Make yourself more personable, spontaneous, and interesting. Instead of reading about, thinking about, and talking about concepts and the goings-on of life, maybe you should stop intellectualizing and start living. An analytical approach is appropriate in some situations, but you need to break out of the aspie fallbacks of the comforting routine and cold fact. If only for your own sake, getting some new, less bookish interests can only make you a more well-rounded, more fulfilled person; of course, it isn't stopping you from enjoying solitary, more esoteric pursuits with the rest of your time.

Of course, you were asking for women, but hey, at least as an aspie guy, I know this much about women.
I aggree. (also a male w/ AS)

But I would like to add I am the opposite of you, spending 100% of my time to learning social intelligence as opposed to nurturing my own natral intelligence. The side effect? currently a loss of self. I feel empty, almost as if I lost valuable time learning to socialize and "get women" only to realize what was truly important...woman come and go but true natural beauty comes from within and my talents (especially in music) have suffered a massive loss.

So now I am like you, looking for that balence.

Women (especially NT) do not really care for long bring conversations on capital cities. They do however enjoy long interesting discussions on thigs like life and nature, and they do however enjoy hearing passion in a mans voice, when he puts things (passions) in front of them(women) it shows a very masculine side they can not help but admire.

See women (obviously generalized) are more social based, more emotional based, and more competitive (especially today) so naturally it is much more difficult for them to find a sense of self therefore making it very attractive to see in a man. IMO that is one of the key factors why music is so sexy, seing a man (or woman) performing. That and also admiration, as well as most musicians wreak of sex...

Hope this helps,

-Zane


_________________
"The world is dying; time to suit up"


wolfsmom
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 6
Location: In the kitchen

21 Dec 2008, 3:10 pm

Hello!

I am a mom of an asperger teen, and I can answer your question. Yes, men do like intelligent women, but.....they don't want them smarter than they are usually. So, the way to a man's heart and mind is to be yourself except sometimes you have to let them be right even if they are wrong or not as smart as you.

Men naturally want to take care of women, and they sometimes feel threatened if a woman is too strong minded, so women grow up and learn to "dumb down" a little and not act like smarty pants all the time. You have to be yourself, but also relax and don't argue with them about small details. I have been married 17 years, and have a very smart husband. We took and IQ test and we are equally smart. He still loves to "bet" me on silly things, like who sings a certain song or other trivia, we usually bet who has to do the dishes or clean the house, or who gets the last red vine in the pack.

So, that is a way you can have fun with a man and show them your intelligence without putting it in their face. They want to be manly and it sometime requires you to "appear the weaker sex".

I hope that helps, they also like you to do things with them that they like to do...I play golf sometimes with my husband not thrilled to go but we have fun anyway or watch football. Love is Sharing and Taking Turns in Talking and Interests!

Merry Christmas All!
Wolfs Mom



anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

21 Dec 2008, 3:18 pm

For me it does, BIG time, but I admit it counts for nothing without a good sense of humour (but sense of humour in many cases comes hand in hand with high IQ, it just gets more elaborate, which BTW I find totally sexy).


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


nothingunusual
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 May 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 511
Location: Belfast, Ireland.

21 Dec 2008, 4:08 pm

Intellectualism tops the list of desirable traits for me.

An intelligent man with conversational skills and a thrist for knowledge is very attractive. Someone who has interests beyond everyday personal experience, who can articulate insights about his everyday experiences will continue to be interesting as time goes on.


_________________
For time has imprisoned us,
In the order of our years,
In the discipline of our ways,
And in the passing of momentary stillness.
We can see our chaos in motion.


DWill
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 167

21 Dec 2008, 4:40 pm

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... f-sex.html

It looks like it means something but not as much as good looks. Of course girls are going to go for all they can get though :).

I think that if I had to perform tasks in front of a camera I would look very stupid though, despite my intelligence scores which indicate otherwise.



nothingunusual
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 May 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 511
Location: Belfast, Ireland.

21 Dec 2008, 4:59 pm

You'd imagine intellectual types would be the new Alpha males in this day and age. 8)

The average female's definition of Alpha male is not the most apt for today, but the most apt to the world a 2.5 million years ago; ie. A brute Neanderthal. Conclusion - Most women fail at good judgement.


_________________
For time has imprisoned us,
In the order of our years,
In the discipline of our ways,
And in the passing of momentary stillness.
We can see our chaos in motion.


timeisdead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 895
Location: Nowhere

21 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm

Quote:
Reluctantly noted, however I'm pleased you put your own advice into this, because you made perfect sense in what you said. I really hate to admit it, but you're right, being full of various facts and theories is a bit off-putting to girls.

Untrue! I love men with a deep interest in history or politics. I consider a man incredibly boring if all he can talk about are football games and the latest reality shows on MTV.



NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

21 Dec 2008, 6:07 pm

AutisticMalcontent wrote:
You said "Make yourself more personable, spontaneous, and interesting". I believe you're trying to say I should adapt my intelligence to the emotional level for clearer understanding by women. So in esscense, you are saying I should abandon my facts and figures to become less formal and more sociable with women, paying particular attention to the emotional/comfort aspect of knowledge? It is a sad day when I have to actually abandon my "litany of facts" and books smarts to appeal to the simpler tastes of women. It's little wonder why almost all (but not all) of them like knuckleheads and guys with overly inflated egos, they can converse with them on rudimentary terms, like emotions and social events, as opposed to intellectual knowledge.

This is really misconstruing what I wrote. I'm not suggesting you should magically forget what you know. Instead I am saying you should devote some of your time to more varied pursuits. You may enjoy life more.