Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop | Search
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats
   Members: 20,255
   Online Now: 321



People Online:
Visitors: 195
Members: 126
New Today: 17
New Yesterday: 18
Latest: quKestIonE

Search
Google
Web WP.net



  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
" *love* is gay, dude!"
1, 2  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Love and Dating
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
D1nk0
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Dec 12, 2007
Age: 29
Posts: 1589

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:05 am    Post subject: " *love* is gay, dude!" Reply with quote

I recently read an article in a very trashy, low-brow monthly publication called The Exotic Underground which featured a cynical, ostensibly macho article bashing "romantic love". This was the february issue centered around valentines day. It included such moronic, insipid, plebian statements such as: "nothing is more pitiful than a love-struck man....pathetic faggots" Rolling Eyes . AFAIC such statements bely the amazing stupidity of the author; but the question remains: Why is it considered unmacho for men to express interest in Romantic Love towards women??? I remember being told by my best friend Jason(VERY cynical guy) that "men dont talk about relationships, men talk about SEX" *sigh*. Where did this stupid bullshit come from and how did it find itsway into (macho)"guy culture"? Theres this weird cultural norm that men are supposed to Only want the physical component of a relationship and care nothing about any sort of emotional connection. Yeah I want sex, but its Not all that I want! I want *The Whole Package*-sex included Razz .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Social_Fantom
Aspie Overlord


Joined: Feb 23, 2008
Age: 23
Posts: 10168
Location: Watching from the shadows

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know right, I want nothing more than to shower a woman with affection. I have so much affection to offer a woman and I know that's one thing they want from a man. The whole "macho" thing is a load of bull sh*t anyway. I don't have to be "macho" to be a man, you know what makes me a man? I would tell you but this isn't the place to discuss that. My point is, this whole "macho" thing is so overrated. And for any guys that think I'm a sissy, I ACKNOWLEDGE WOMEN AS PEOPLE TOO!! Stick that in your pipe and smoke it!
_________________
Our greatest glory is not in never falling but in rising every time we fall.
-Confucius

5th Sin: Wrath
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ToadOfSteel
This is the right planet... out there, somewhere..


Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Age: 20
Posts: 1743
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Macho" is stupid, and the only men who subscribe to the concept of "macho" are the ones that are insecure about their own manhood (as well as the village people, but that's a completely different story entirely... The villiage people's version of macho is okay...)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bollinger
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker


Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 63

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:34 am    Post subject: Re: " *love* is gay, dude!" Reply with quote

D1nk0 wrote:
Why is it considered unmacho for men to express interest in Romantic Love towards women???


Here's my theorey: biologists say that we continue to have some of the same genetic coding that our ancestors had millions of years ago, when they were apelike creatures, or tiny ratlike mammals, or fish.

In many non-human species, it is customary for the males to fight over mates. The dominant males get to mate with most or all of the fertile females in the area, and the other males get little or no opportunity to mate -- until they kill or disable the dominant male or get him to back off voluntarily.

Clearly, these primitive-brained instincts for dominance and many mates were predominant among our ancestors at some time or times during the history of life on Earth, and they are still felt by present-day men. Apparently they're felt much more strongly by some men than by others. And if a man is controlled by these instincts -- whether he actually manages somehow to keep a whole harem of women, or if he can barely get any women to pay attention to him -- it's harder for him to develop a romantically loving relationship. The pattern of the dominant male, who either has or wants to have many mates, is pretty much incompatible with the human feelings which we know as romantic love.

In short: macho men are behaving like monkeys.

Macho behavior will probably eventually die out, by means of natural selection, for two reasons:

1) Macho behavior seems to attract some women in some cases, but not in most cases.

2) Macho guys seem to be less interested in impregnating women then in making sure that they don't get pregnant, so that they can coninue to enjoy them sexually, without any interference from pregnancy or children.
_________________
"Dada ist die Sonne, Dada ist das Ei. Dada ist die Polizei der Polizei." Richard Huelsenbeck
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Awesomelyglorious
Destroyer of worlds, reaver of souls


Joined: Dec 18, 2005
Posts: 4855
Location: United States

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:48 am    Post subject: Re: " *love* is gay, dude!" Reply with quote

Bollinger wrote:

2) Macho guys seem to be less interested in impregnating women then in making sure that they don't get pregnant, so that they can coninue to enjoy them sexually, without any interference from pregnancy or children.

Theres the problem though, how many macho guys are very good at preventing their women from getting pregnant? It seems to me that they do a terrible job at it compared to the rest of the population.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
sinsboldly
Free Range Aspie


Joined: Nov 22, 2006
Age: 57
Posts: 6138
Location: The Emerald Forest

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Men don't want OTHER men to be 'romantic' because then the women will want THEM to be 'romantic' TOO.

and they are far too lazy.


Merle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slowmutant
Heyyyy!


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 3374
Location: The Great White North

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Social_Fantom wrote:
I know right, I want nothing more than to shower a woman with affection. I have so much affection to offer a woman and I know that's one thing they want from a man. The whole "macho" thing is a load of bull sh*t anyway. I don't have to be "macho" to be a man, you know what makes me a man? I would tell you but this isn't the place to discuss that. My point is, this whole "macho" thing is so overrated. And for any guys that think I'm a sissy, I ACKNOWLEDGE WOMEN AS PEOPLE TOO!! Stick that in your pipe and smoke it!


Bravo, Fantom! Such bravery & honesty!
I salute you.

The stereotypical Macho Man with whom we're all so familiar, he is indeed a fallacy. No human being is without vulernability, man or woman. The macho posturing we see everywhere is amusing because it belies the "real man's" profound insecurities. The so-called tough guys of this world can't attain true manhood until they admit their cowardice. Until you are wiling to take off the armour of machismo and be vulnerable, real masculinity will elude you.

But a bit of macho is good. It's a balance between showing your toughness and showing your vulnerability.

Uncompromising macho is no good. Total wimpiness isn't either. Remember, in the adult male body there always a mix ot testosterone and estrogen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
slowmutant
Heyyyy!


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 3374
Location: The Great White North

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't it interesting how a woman will covet the "bad boy" type and stay with him despite the horrible treatment she receives?

Sure, women think they want the bad boy, but always find him to be an abusive jerk. Even harder to believe is why they stoically endure his abuse and call it ice-cream. Some women actually defend their abusers. So sad, how they're brainwashed into believing that they are happy with bruised arms and black eyes. Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MissConstrue
Aquarius


Joined: Feb 05, 2008
Age: 26
Posts: 10223
Location: Anywhere but HERE!

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I definitely agree. I had a friend that was into the bad boy image and she eventually ended up having to go to a woman's shelter. I did too but my case wasn't bad like hers. I use to only go out with this guy because I had issues along with substance abuse and insecurity. I mean he was the one that asked me out and I was like OMG, a guy likes me.

I've never been attracted to the bad boy image and felt wrong for it. When I use to bring that up with the particular friend I was talking about, all she'd tell me was, " There's something wrong with you, he's hot." I think she even thought I was gay, imagine that, me not attracted to the "macho guy." I think I've learned a lot from my mistakes of trying to fit in the "what we consider normal world." Just made me more miserable, that and aspies I didn't know about.

BTW, is it just me or is that, "that's so gay" starting to sound old or like a broken record. Does to me, besides it being homophobic which some ppl are, it's getting corny as hell. So's the word faggot but I don't know, maybe it's a guy thing or ppl thing. It's just getting old to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DejaQ
The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight


Joined: Feb 18, 2007
Age: 17
Posts: 1804
Location: The United States of Whatever

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MissConstrue wrote:
BTW, is it just me or is that, "that's so gay" starting to sound old or like a broken record. Does to me, besides it being homophobic which some ppl are, it's getting corny as hell. So's the word faggot but I don't know, maybe it's a guy thing or ppl thing. It's just getting old to me.


"That's so gay" is so 1990s. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Who_Am_I
Absurdist


Joined: Aug 28, 2005
Age: 24
Posts: 2930
Location: My body is in Brisbane and my mind is in the gutter. :D

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:38 am    Post subject: Re: " *love* is gay, dude!" Reply with quote

Bollinger wrote:
D1nk0 wrote:
Why is it considered unmacho for men to express interest in Romantic Love towards women???


In short: macho men are behaving like monkeys.


Well said.
_________________
*expletive* the normal world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Dracula
Deinonychus
Deinonychus


Joined: Nov 23, 2007
Age: 19
Posts: 318

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Monkeys? I'm the King Kong of the macho men. Cool

- D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gekitsu
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Apr 05, 2007
Age: 25
Posts: 745
Location: bavaria/germany

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hurm... i guess its a men-amongst-men-bred phenomenon. something along the lines of showing that one is unshakeable.
it reminds me a bit of something one of those sex scientists once said: "penis size increments are important in one place: the mens locker, for comparing"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sinsboldly
Free Range Aspie


Joined: Nov 22, 2006
Age: 57
Posts: 6138
Location: The Emerald Forest

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gekitsu wrote:
hurm... i guess its a men-amongst-men-bred phenomenon. something along the lines of showing that one is unshakeable.
it reminds me a bit of something one of those sex scientists once said: "penis size increments are important in one place: the mens locker, for comparing"


yeah, right


Merle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
D1nk0
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Dec 12, 2007
Age: 29
Posts: 1589

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MissConstrue wrote:
I definitely agree. I had a friend that was into the bad boy image and she eventually ended up having to go to a woman's shelter. I did too but my case wasn't bad like hers. I use to only go out with this guy because I had issues along with substance abuse and insecurity. I mean he was the one that asked me out and I was like OMG, a guy likes me.

I've never been attracted to the bad boy image and felt wrong for it. When I use to bring that up with the particular friend I was talking about, all she'd tell me was, " There's something wrong with you, he's hot." I think she even thought I was gay, imagine that, me not attracted to the "macho guy." I think I've learned a lot from my mistakes of trying to fit in the "what we consider normal world." Just made me more miserable, that and aspies I didn't know about.

BTW, is it just me or is that, "that's so gay" starting to sound old or like a broken record. Does to me, besides it being homophobic which some ppl are, it's getting corny as hell. So's the word faggot but I don't know, maybe it's a guy thing or ppl thing. It's just getting old to me.


The question wasnt why women fall for 'bad boys' and macho thugs as opposed to romantic 'nice guys' MissConstrue, its why its considered unmasculine for a guy to want a romantic relationship and not just sex.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Love and Dating All times are GMT - 5 Hours
1, 2  Next  
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2008, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art