Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop | Search
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats
   Members: 21,963
   Online Now: 403



People Online:
Visitors: 285
Members: 118
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 28
Latest: ArenaTech

Search
Google
Web WP.net



  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
California overturned gay-marriage ban today!
1, 2, 3 ... 26, 27, 28  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Averick
Calculateurre of Chaos


Joined: Mar 06, 2007
Age: 28
Posts: 2005
Location: in the trenches..

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:45 pm    Post subject: California overturned gay-marriage ban today! Reply with quote

It's only a matter of time before "californiacation" effects us all.
First it was Massachusetts, now them. In time, all fifty-two states
will allow gay marriage.

Sorry my fundalmentalist brethren.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla


Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 2043

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I heard this on the news hours ago. I wonder how long it'll last before it is repealed (that is if it becomes repealed). Although, they did report that Ah-nold is not going to support an amendment. Hmm. Time.

One thing I was thinking about: It never said that a Church/Temple is to allow gay marriages. Neither can they be forced to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ragtime
Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 7401
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:56 pm    Post subject: Re: California overturned gay-marriage ban today! Reply with quote

Averick wrote:
It's only a matter of time before "californiacation" effects us all.
First it was Massachusetts, now them. In time, all fifty-two states
will allow gay marriage.

Sorry my fundalmentalist brethren.


As a Texan, does that mean I'll be safe for a while? Razz
Ah, to live in one of the last remaining conservative strongholds...
Life is good. Cool
_________________
Anyone who is interested in philosophy, the of meaning of life, and answers to our hardest questions, I suggest you check out the free, online mp3 archive of Ravi Zacharias at www.rzim.org.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Averick
Calculateurre of Chaos


Joined: Mar 06, 2007
Age: 28
Posts: 2005
Location: in the trenches..

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:00 pm    Post subject: Re: California overturned gay-marriage ban today! Reply with quote

Ragtime wrote:
Averick wrote:
It's only a matter of time before "californiacation" effects us all.
First it was Massachusetts, now them. In time, all fifty-two states
will allow gay marriage.

Sorry my fundalmentalist brethren.


As a Texan, does that mean I'll be safe for a while? Razz
Ah, to live in one of the last remaining conservative strongholds...
Life is good. Cool


Maybe until "Brokeback Mountain II" is made there. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Averick
Calculateurre of Chaos


Joined: Mar 06, 2007
Age: 28
Posts: 2005
Location: in the trenches..

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:
I heard this on the news hours ago. I wonder how long it'll last before it is repealed (that is if it becomes repealed). Although, they did report that Ah-nold is not going to support an amendment. Hmm. Time.

One thing I was thinking about: It never said that a Church/Temple is to allow gay marriages. Neither can they be forced to.


There are many priests who support gay marriage.
Enter conundrum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Escuerd
Blue Jay
Blue Jay


Joined: May 02, 2008
Age: 24
Posts: 97

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:
I heard this on the news hours ago. I wonder how long it'll last before it is repealed (that is if it becomes repealed). Although, they did report that Ah-nold is not going to support an amendment. Hmm. Time.

One thing I was thinking about: It never said that a Church/Temple is to allow gay marriages. Neither can they be forced to.


Well, I should think not. Unless something has changed that I'm not aware of, churches aren't required to perform any marriages they don't want to. And if there were a movement to force them to do so, I'd oppose it. Then again, it is annoying to me that the legal, cultural and religious concepts of marriage have been so conflated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CityAsylum
Venio. Exeunt omnes.


Joined: Jan 08, 2008
Posts: 3513
Location: NYC

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:
One thing I was thinking about: It never said that a Church/Temple is to allow gay marriages. Neither can they be forced to.

Why would anyone try to force a church or temple to allow gay marriages? Marriage was invented as a business arrangement, and then became a legal condition as well, which is why it is unfair at many levels to deny such a legal right to gays.

There are plenty of religious organizations that happily support gay marriage, but the catch was that there was no legality involved to allow for such basic things as insurance, ownership of property, health care proxies, etc.

While the tradition of marriage may have been adopted by most religions, it did not originate as a 'holy sacrament', which is exactly the sort of rubbish you'll hear from fundamentalists of any religious base.
_________________
I'm as puzzled as a newborn child
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla


Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 2043

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CityAsylum wrote:
oscuria wrote:
One thing I was thinking about: It never said that a Church/Temple is to allow gay marriages. Neither can they be forced to.

Why would anyone try to force a church or temple to allow gay marriages? Marriage was invented as a business arrangement, and then became a legal condition as well, which is why it is unfair at many levels to deny such a legal right to gays.

There are plenty of religious organizations that happily support gay marriage, but the catch was that there was no legality involved to allow for such basic things as insurance, ownership of property, health care proxies, etc.

While the tradition of marriage may have been adopted by most religions, it did not originate as a 'holy sacrament', which is exactly the sort of rubbish you'll hear from fundamentalists of any religious base.


Ah, naive? There are many gays who demand to be married by a church or religious organization.

Besides, your beliefs are rubbish to me. I really am not sympathetic to homosexuals getting married.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CityAsylum
Venio. Exeunt omnes.


Joined: Jan 08, 2008
Posts: 3513
Location: NYC

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:
Ah, naive? There are many gays who demand to be married by a church or religious organization.

Yes, and there are plenty to accommodate them, so it is not necessary to force them - you have created an artificial problem.

oscuria wrote:
Besides, your beliefs are rubbish to me. I really am not sympathetic to homosexuals getting married.

Yeah, when I wrote that I was saying, "Oh, dear God, what if my beliefs are deemed rubbish by oscuria?", and with a mighty voice He answered, "Who gives a damn what oscuria thinks?" Laughing

So it looks as if I'll be able to sleep tonight after all! Wink
_________________
I'm as puzzled as a newborn child
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phagocyte
Low-Functioning NT


Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 1846

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, progress. As expected.
_________________
I am neurotypical - I just want to find out more about Asperger's Syndrome.

But Master! Does not the fire need water too? Does not the mountain need the storm? Does not your scrotum need kicking?

-Chever
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ja
Raven
Raven


Joined: Dec 14, 2007
Age: 40
Posts: 113

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a helluva thing -- Activist Judges ruling from the bench that never let voters have any say...
What a fuggin' disgrace!

Anyone ever read LIBERAL FASCISM by Jonah Goldberg?
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0385511841/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210896730&sr=8-1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Odin
Supreme Genius


Joined: Oct 13, 2006
Age: 22
Posts: 1885
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ja wrote:
It's a helluva thing -- Activist Judges ruling from the bench that never let voters have any say...
What a fuggin' disgrace!


This is a democratic republic, not a tyranny by majority. Majority rule is restrained by the rights of the rights of the minority.

Oh, and "activist judges ruling from the bench" is how common law works, you dolt.
_________________
My Blog: http://selzshaven.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
skafather84
Platypus God


Joined: Mar 21, 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 4725
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ja wrote:
It's a helluva thing -- Activist Judges ruling from the bench that never let voters have any say...
What a fuggin' disgrace!

Anyone ever read LIBERAL FASCISM by Jonah Goldberg?
http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0385511841/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210896730&sr=8-1



you say that and yet i'm more than willing to bet on an issue like the legalization of marijuana where it's been voted on for it to be legalized outright or for medicinal use and you probably side with the activist judges who decide to ignore the 10th amendment that states a state has the right to govern its people in ways not covered by the constitution (which drug laws aren't).

state law should trump federal. and yes, including with the gay marriage bans in the midwest.

...and if you really think cali would vote against gay marriage...uh...what?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Awesomelyglorious
Destroyer of worlds, reaver of souls


Joined: Dec 18, 2005
Posts: 5745
Location: United States

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:

One thing I was thinking about: It never said that a Church/Temple is to allow gay marriages. Neither can they be forced to.

I can agree with this. Freedom of association is important.

ja wrote:
It's a helluva thing -- Activist Judges ruling from the bench that never let voters have any say...
What a fuggin' disgrace!

Well.... I only dislike this method because I think that this goes against how the institutions were originally meant to work. This is not to say that some activism does not have good results, such as right to privacy and things like that, or to say that I disagree with the results, I just think that re-definitions and certain re-interpretations should be acts of legislation. Really though, this matter goes both ways given how the interstate commerce part of the constitution is used to justify all sorts of nonsensical decisions, as shown by skafather's comments on marijuana.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
slowmutant
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Age: 29
Posts: 7010
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Church doesn't have to bend over for gays. And I don't want to see it bend over. Why don't the gays have their own churches and stop trying to push their buggery on heterosexual churchgoers?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
1, 2, 3 ... 26, 27, 28  Next  
Page 1 of 28

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2008, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art