Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop | Search
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats
   Members: 21,963
   Online Now: 407



People Online:
Visitors: 285
Members: 122
New Today: 1
New Yesterday: 28
Latest: ArenaTech

Search
Google
Web WP.net



  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
California overturned gay-marriage ban today!
Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 26, 27, 28  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Odin
Supreme Genius


Joined: Oct 13, 2006
Age: 22
Posts: 1885
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ragtime wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sounds like you're advocating secular bigotry over religious principles.



what rights are you having taken away?


First tell me why you'd care, because all indications have been that you don't.

And that's the crux of the matter: No one cares about Christians' right to religious expression.
The now-politically-charged term "tolerance" was invented in order to be intolerant to Christians.


Same old lie. As I said, you guys think anything less then Christianity being a state religion is "oppression" by "evil secular bigots."
_________________
My Blog: http://selzshaven.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Awesomelyglorious
Destroyer of worlds, reaver of souls


Joined: Dec 18, 2005
Posts: 5745
Location: United States

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:

1) We as in We the People. There will always be discrimination, we just are accepting of the discrimination we have, and unaccepting towards others. I don't really have the same definitions that people have when they use things like discrimination, racism, hatred, etc. Keep that in mind, it's usually semantics.

I did not agree to that, and Lysander Spooner, argued in his paper "No Treason" that there is no "we". I understand that discrimination will always exist, but I don't want to be a party to the discrimination that I don't agree with.

Quote:
3) What do you mean by some people have religion? I'm trying to see this context. Do you mean that they have religion and prefer not to be told what to do because of it? Yes. But there are ways you can make laws with consideration towards the People, the Religion, and the Tradition. I don't pay much mind to the latest waves and shits in trend because it can change to anything.

You said "you believe in a State", and I was just mocking that.

Quote:
4) A marriage is a contract. I would like people to be more penalized when a marriage is disrespected.

Why? They didn't agree to stiffer penalties. I don't see a problem with them seeker stiffer penalties for violation of the marital contract though.

Quote:
5) I am aware of that definition, but usually the title Tyrant is given as an emotional outburst. Especially when it is against a person who expresses his beliefs.

Ok, and I am just am using it.
Quote:

6) The tradition argument comes in play and you know it does. This is why there are the two major branches in politics labeled Conservative and Liberal. As a conservative I have to take into account the tradition (both local, national, and international), see how it fits with my personal beliefs, and if the conflict between other's interest is worth taking into consideration.

And I don't believe in either conservatives or liberals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Odin
Supreme Genius


Joined: Oct 13, 2006
Age: 22
Posts: 1885
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:
greenblue wrote:

well, I'm for secular principles over religious bigotry. Wink

not saying there are no religious principles.
not saying there are no secular bigotry.

But I know we all here would not perfectly agree on what constitutes bigotry and what constitutes principle, and to say it better, the use and misuse of any of them.


I always had this discussion with my mind: Considering that the majority in America profess on being of a religion, why not allow laws that are respectable to both religion (all religions) and secularism? After all, we are not a truly secular nation.


The founders set up the US as a secular country in order to PROTECT freedom of religion. The mingling of religion and government leads to persecution of minority beliefs. This is why the attack on secularism by the Religious Right is so disturbing, Official secularism is NECESSARY for freedom of religion to exist.
_________________
My Blog: http://selzshaven.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Orwell
Outer Party Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 3734
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Odin wrote:
The founders set up the US as a secular country in order to PROTECT freedom of religion. The mingling of religion and government leads to persecution of minority beliefs. This is why the attack on secularism by the Religious Right is so disturbing, Official secularism is NECESSARY for freedom of religion to exist.

False. The US was founded on Christian principles. We extended toleration to different religions, but even in this we were limited. For a long time there was distrust of Catholics, as it was thought their loyalty to Rome might trump their loyalty to America. Atheists were long prohibited from acting as witnesses and offering testimony because it was believed that, without a God, there was nothing to bind them to an oath. Religious toleration originally was primarily for different sects of Protestantism. I don't really agree with that system, but it's what was historically there. I could point you towards Supreme Court cases affirming the Christian nature of this country (including one that ruled it unlawful to establish a school that didn't include Biblical instruction) if you like.

I don't mind you advocating for greater secularization, but please don't rewrite history in the process.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skafather84
Platypus God


Joined: Mar 21, 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 4725
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla


Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 2043

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
...


1) I don't agree with Spooner's assertion. I understand his positions but I'd rather see a bigger government (certainly not fascist/totalitarian however). I tend to follow the Social Contract Theory, though more Hobbesian.

2) This is one of my problems with the government, since it is in charge of acknowledging marriage currently. If they were really honest about it, they'd punish those who broke the legal contract.
_________________
I'm no democRAT, I'm a republiCAN!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla


Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 2043

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.


They knew more about the Bible than you do.
_________________
I'm no democRAT, I'm a republiCAN!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orwell
Outer Party Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 3734
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.

Do you have dismissive sarcastic comments for the rest of my points?
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skafather84
Platypus God


Joined: Mar 21, 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 4725
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.

Do you have dismissive sarcastic comments for the rest of my points?



citing past wrongs doesn't make the current one any more acceptable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Orwell
Outer Party Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 3734
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.

Do you have dismissive sarcastic comments for the rest of my points?



citing past wrongs doesn't make the current one any more acceptable.

You obviously did not read my post all the way through.
Orwell wrote:
I don't really agree with that system [only a limited degree of religious tolerance] ...

(snip)

I don't mind you advocating for greater secularization, but please don't rewrite history in the process.

_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Awesomelyglorious
Destroyer of worlds, reaver of souls


Joined: Dec 18, 2005
Posts: 5745
Location: United States

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:

1) I don't agree with Spooner's assertion. I understand his positions but I'd rather see a bigger government (certainly not fascist/totalitarian however). I tend to follow the Social Contract Theory, though more Hobbesian.

Well, I know you would not agree with Spooner's ideas, however, I am not much of social contract theory as it is practically a blank check to the state. I have probably already stated my take on the government though.
Quote:

2) This is one of my problems with the government, since it is in charge of acknowledging marriage currently. If they were really honest about it, they'd punish those who broke the legal contract

Well, then it would have to define violations of that contract.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
skafather84
Platypus God


Joined: Mar 21, 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 4725
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.

Do you have dismissive sarcastic comments for the rest of my points?



citing past wrongs doesn't make the current one any more acceptable.

You obviously did not read my post all the way through.
Orwell wrote:
I don't really agree with that system [only a limited degree of religious tolerance] ...

(snip)

I don't mind you advocating for greater secularization, but please don't rewrite history in the process.


okay but to say that it was founded on christian principles isn't being completely honest. the christian influences more reflected the culture of the time than it did the founding fathers or the intent within their writings.

edit: also, i was doing this in between builds at work...can't read everything fast enough to respond to every point.


Last edited by skafather84 on Mon May 19, 2008 10:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
skafather84
Platypus God


Joined: Mar 21, 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 4725
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.


They knew more about the Bible than you do.



10+ years of catholic school. i know the history, the context, and core contents of the bible. i may not be able to cite bible verses by heart but i know more than enough of it to hold my own against most christian nutjobs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla


Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 2043

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skafather84 wrote:


okay but to say that it was founded on christian principles isn't being completely honest. the christian influences more reflected the culture of the time than it did the founding fathers or the intent within their writings.

edit: also, i was doing this in between builds at work...can't read everything fast enough to respond to every point.



What does Christian principles mean to you?
_________________
I'm no democRAT, I'm a republiCAN!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Odin
Supreme Genius


Joined: Oct 13, 2006
Age: 22
Posts: 1885
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:
False. The US was founded on Christian principles.


WRONG, TOTALLY WRONG!!! Most of the founders were Deists and secularists, THAT IS A FACT.
_________________
My Blog: http://selzshaven.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 26, 27, 28  Next  
Page 23 of 28

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2008, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art