Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop |
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats

   Members: 31,095
   Online Now: 386



People Online:
Visitors: 305
Members: 81
New Today: 2
New Yesterday: 21
Latest: DeadlyArchAngel

  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
Girl told police her parents praised Hitler for killing
Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> News and Current Events
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pandd
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Posts: 1909

PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

zen_mistress wrote:

How is it a personal attack?
Quote:
I am sorry your assessment of these kind of belief systems is that they are valid and that people should be able to teach their children that Hitlers death camps were ok,

Whereas_I_actually_said
pandd wrote:
I deplore the views of these parents, and I am greatly disturbed by the idea of a young mind being exposed to such an intellectually and socially hostile environment.

zen_mistress wrote:
which is why I dont know what your point even is.

At what point does teaching your children your "world perspective" become something the state should declare illegal child abuse? Who's standards do we apply in choosing what values parents may attempt to instill in their children?
At what point does someone's subjective political/social views become illegal child abuse? Who decides which view points are legal?

Quote:
In fact it is you who are attacking me

How_so? Have_I_pretended_you_hold_a_view_you_have_already_stated_you_do_not_hold,_for_the_purpose
of_attempting_to_insult_you_personally? I_thought_I_had_stuck_to_the_subject_matter_of_the_discussion_respecting_that_your_views_are_as_
you_have_stated_them.
Quote:

It is all very well for people to say that these people have a perfect right to raise their children in a white supremacy environment,

Aha.
pandd wrote:
I deplore the views of these parents, and I am greatly disturbed by the idea of a young mind being exposed to such an intellectually and socially hostile environment.

Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zen_mistress
* ENFP *
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Age: 32
Posts: 2195

PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1) Again you have completely missed the point. I am expressing surprise that you seem more concerned about civil liberties than the disturbing idea of raising a child as a white supremacist. I am also surprised at this as you initially expressed your dislike of it, yet seemed ok with these people being allowed by society to continue with their teaching this to a child. I am not saying you are a racist, I dont think you are, but I cant understand the order of your priorities.

This child was taking her teachings to school with her and the teachers are to just accept this? A child doesn't grow up in an isolated little bubble, they have to interact with other members of society. A white supremacist child can cause a lot of friction in a school, and I am sure non-white students would benefit from an environment free of racism where they could just get on with their school work and play. I dont just see this as a matter for 2 parents and 2 children.

2) Your initial post in response to my post was a personal attack, and you are the one who has been criticising my posts piece by piece. I have very good reasons to be upset at the idea of white supremacy, you dont know me, or my history, yet you seem to think I should hold your opinions or I am wrong. I saw your post before I posted and I was happy to let you have your opinion, until you got stuck into me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pandd
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Posts: 1909

PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

zen_mistress wrote:
1) Again you have completely missed the point. I am expressing surprise that you seem more concerned about civil liberties than the disturbing idea of raising a child as a white supremacist.

Which-again-ignores-what-I-did-say-and-replaces-it-with-what-I-did-not-say.
pandd wrote:
This kind of situation presents a conundrum.

If-in-fact-I-were-more-concerned-with-civil-liberties-then-why-would-any-such-situation-be-a-conundrum?
Quote:

I am also surprised at this as you initially expressed your dislike of it, yet seemed ok with these people being allowed by society to continue with their teaching this to a child.

I-have-never-stated-or-implied-that-I-am-ok-with-such-a-thing.--Can-you-not-argue-your-own-case-without-attempting-to-discredit-others-by-falsely-attributing-negative-positions-to-them?
Quote:
I am not saying you are a racist, I dont think you are, but I cant understand the order of your priorities.

The-law-works-on-generalities.--Either-it-is-or-is-not-acceptable-to-remove-children-from-their-parents-on-the-basis-of-parental-teachings-about-social-and-political-issues.--If-it-is-legally-acceptable-then-there-must-be-answers-to-hard-questions-such-as-how-to-differentiate-between-legal-teaching-of-parental-values,-and-illegal-child-abusive-teachings.
Quote:

This child was taking her teachings to school with her and the teachers are to just accept this?

Emotive-hand-wringing-does-not-change-the-fact-that-if-society-is-to-remove-children-from-their-parents-either-it-does-so-arbitrarily-or-according-to-clear-rules-of-law.--If-the-latter-(and-who-would-want-arbitrary-removal-of-children-by-the-state),-then-how-are-we-to-legally-test-when-views-are-illegal-to-teach-to-children?--The-complexity-and-difficulty-and-lack-of-empirical-testing-(of-the-answer)-that-characterizes-this-question-is-what-concerns-me.
Quote:

A child doesn't grow up in an isolated little bubble, they have to interact with other members of society. A white supremacist child can cause a lot of friction in a school, and I am sure non-white students would benefit from an environment free of racism where they could just get on with their school work and play. I dont just see this as a matter for 2 parents and 2 children.

I-do-not-see-where-I-have-suggested-that-it-is.
Quote:

2) Your initial post in response to my post was a personal attack,

I-cannot-see-how.
Quote:

and you are the one who has been criticising my posts piece by piece.

Even-if-you-choose-to-call-responding-"criticizing",-there-is-a-difference-between-criticizing-someone's-comments'-and-making-up-nasty-associations-about-them-(such-as-implying-they-are-ok-with-some-rather-nasty-opinions-to-associate-them-with-racists)-that-are-contrary-to-their-comments.

There-is-a-difference-between-addressing-the-actual-stated-views-or-comments-made-by-another,-and-trying-to-shift-the-discussion-to-commentary-that-intentionally-and-falsely-associates-negative-views-with-the-other-person-for-the-purpose-of-attacking-them-personally-rather-than-addressing-their-actual-comments-or-arguments.
Quote:
I have very good reasons to be upset at the idea of white supremacy, you dont know me, or my history, yet you seem to think I should hold your opinions or I am wrong.

No,-I-just-assumed-you-could-discuss-your-opinions-in-an-adult-like-manner.
Quote:
I saw your post before I posted and I was happy to let you have your opinion, until you got stuck into me.

If-you-do-not-wish-to-discuss-your-opinion-it-is-somewhat-mysterious-to-me-why-you-would-post-it-on-a-public-discussion-forum. Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hashberry
Sea Gull
Sea Gull


Joined: May 04, 2008
Posts: 249

PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its a bastard when the space bar stops working!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pandd
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Posts: 1909

PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hashberry wrote:
Its a bastard when the space bar stops working!

Yes,-I-wonder-if-I-can-assign-the-spacebar-function-to-some-other-key....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zen_mistress
* ENFP *
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Age: 32
Posts: 2195

PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess I am, not only able to type without dashes between every word, probably at a disadvantage, I am not easily able to be objective when it comes to the idea of bringing up children with a belief system that condones and admires the idea of genocide.

Maybe I am very emotional. I happen to care a lot about people of different races being comfortable in this world, including myself, though I know that at times issues may be raised and feelings may be hurt.

I do not look at an article like this with an analytical eye because that is not who I am, and I do respond emotionally to many situations, though I know that many other people in the world are also built like me.

I dont believe I am better or worse than people who are more analytical but this is the way I am. I also believe that I am not irrational in feeling that white supremacy groups are a problem that belongs to a whole society.

It can be brought into question how things like this are handled but I think ultimately I support the idea of teachers and social workers being involved with the situation.

Im sure the social workers would be in there if the child brought hard-core porn to school, and people would have less objection to social workers intervening, but people seem rather desensitised to violence and violent ideas at times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadesOfMe
Bunny Pirate on the seven seas!
Phoenix


Joined: Jul 01, 2004
Age: 18
Posts: 18290
Location: California

PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pandd wrote:
zen_mistress wrote:
I think it is good that she is taken away from her parents. She is with an aunt anyway. Her parents are nuts. Nobody that nuts should be warping a child. Children should be protected against stuff like that. Just because someone is a biological parent doesn't mean they are the best people to be looking after a child.

I was not aware any psychiatric evaluation had been conducted on the parents. Unless by "nuts" you mean "holds views that you personally dislike".


I agree. They may hold awful terrible views, but they obviously aren't crazy like the parents of baby Adolf Hitler...
_________________



Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zen_mistress
* ENFP *
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Age: 32
Posts: 2195

PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are loads of interesting comments on the news article from people who hold all sorts of views. This comment in particular sums up how I feel:

Quote:
redjello wrote:
The line in the sand is clear.

You can't infringe on a parents right to teach their children their religion or lack thereof.
You can't infinge on a parents rights to teach their children their own value system.

BUT, when you teach a child hate, that is abusive.

For example, I personally think it is wrong to teach a child "Intelligent Design" as opposed to Evolution. However, I have to grudgingly accept that it is the parents right to do so even though it is bunk. When that child becomes an adult they do their own research and make their own decisions on this.

However, teaching a child hate toward another group is not something that can necessarily be undone by education. And further, that child could ACT on the hate they've been taught.

Abuse of a malleable mind, plain and simple.


http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/story/2009/06/04/mb-nazi-custody-hearing.html#socialcomments

Signing off from this debate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
greenblue
¸.·´´¯`··.¸.·´
Phoenix


Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Posts: 9003
Location: Home

PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ShadesOfMe wrote:
I agree. They may hold awful terrible views, but they obviously aren't crazy like the parents of baby Adolf Hitler...

What Hitler's parents have to do with this?

pandd wrote:
I was not aware any psychiatric evaluation had been conducted on the parents. Unless by "nuts" you mean "holds views that you personally dislike".

I was not aware either that saying someone is nuts necesarily or absolutely means that they are doing a psychiatric evaluation on other people, heck! I never heard any doctor using the term nuts to their patients, much less anyone here implying the mental condition of the parents in a clinical way, I believe, and correct me if I'm wrong, most people would understand what the term "nuts" actually implies.

pandd wrote:
This kind of situation presents a conundrum. Ideally children would not be exposed to the kind of environment where Adolf Hitler is praised, but ideally children would remain with parents who lovingly provide the essentials of life. I do find it rather disturbing that some scribbles on a kid's arm can cause the involvement of child protective services.

well, I don't think the law already does that based on the indoctrination, but, I think I understand why some would like that, and well, what I can say about it is this, things we defend like freedom and rights, they seem to come with a catch, that is, there seems to be a price to pay for the sake of freedom.
_________________
"I realized, nothing really exists".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
pandd
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Posts: 1909

PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

greenblue wrote:

I was not aware either that saying someone is nuts necesarily or absolutely means that they are doing a psychiatric evaluation on other people, heck!

Neither-am-I,-which-is-why-it-seemed-prudent-to-ask;-as-it-transpires-there-does-appear-to-have-been-some-psychiatric-input-questioning-the-mental-health-status-of-the-parents.--Whether-or-not-zen_mistress-was-referring-to-this-or-not-in-her-original-comments-I-do-not-know,-but-I-do-know-more-than-I-would-if-I-had-not-asked.
Quote:

I never heard any doctor using the term nuts to their patients, much less anyone here implying the mental condition of the parents in a clinical way, I believe, and correct me if I'm wrong, most people would understand what the term "nuts" actually implies.

I-have-encountered-examples-of-people-using-it-to-describe-someone-they-believe-has-a-clinical-psychiatric-condition,-and-to-describe-someone-who-holds-a-different-opinion-to-them-(but-who-they-do-not-perceive-as-mentally-ill).

Quote:
there seems to be a price to pay for the sake of freedom.

I-do-not-perceive-that-anyone-is-suggesting-otherwise.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zen_mistress
* ENFP *
Phoenix


Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Age: 32
Posts: 2195

PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am just writing another post to say that I have been thinking and I regret the original post I made with the word "nuts" in it. It was judgemental of me, though I do feel that a person who thinks the Holocaust was a good idea must have had some kind of psychological damaging that has occurred to them somewhere down the track.

I guess that we all have our hot buttons and this is one of mine. I get very angry when reading about white supremacists, hate groups, etc... I guess there are reasons for this. But anyway I shouldnt use a forum to vent these feelings.

I do still feel that people should get involved in these issues and that people shouldnt just stand aside and let people run cults and groups that harm or pose a threat to other people, or involve children in such things. Not that I think anyone else in this thread is condoning this themselves.

I think I also misinterpreted the meaning of some of the comments that were made in this thread, and reacted in a way which wasnt good, and for that I am sorry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Katie_WPG
Velociraptor
Velociraptor


Joined: Sep 08, 2008
Age: 23
Posts: 441
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How the case is progressing, it seems pretty clear how this is going to end.

Basically, the step-father and the aunt are fighting to have the kids. The step-father is a proud skinhead, the aunt is a social worker. The step-father and bio mother (when they lived together) spent most of their time drinking, smoking pot, and watching white supremacist videos. The children have been living with the aunt, and the toddler is apparently doing much better.

Both of the biological parents are deadbeats at this point. The biological father shows up to court hearings, and makes it clear that while he doesn't want the children with the step-father, HE doesn't want anything to do with them himself.

The biological mother has buggered off to Quebec to escape this conflict, but still insists that she wants her kids back.

It seems like a no-brainer that the aunt will receive full custody.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shadowgirl
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Age: 21
Posts: 500

PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How sad.
_________________
How to Know God Personally through Jesus Christ
http://www.ccci.org/

Does God Exist? Here is proof he does.
http://www.everystudent.com/features/isthere.html?gclid=CN_r0_PwrZwCFZZa2godMANp2w
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
history_of_psychiatry
Poopenheimer
Phoenix


Joined: Dec 23, 2006
Age: 25
Posts: 1233
Location: America's penis (Florida)

PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

People like that should not be allowed to have children.
_________________
"You look like the piss boy."

"And YOU look like a bucket of sh1t!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dox47
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Jan 29, 2008
Age: 27
Posts: 1246
Location: Seattle Area

PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For my two cents, infringing on civil liberties is a greater evil than teaching a kid white supremacy. If nothing else, think how many people who are brought up a certain way later reject it entirely, the many former Catholic atheists being but one example. Involving the state in what is and is not OK to teach your children is just too dangerous, it's far too slippery a slope and far too prone to abuse to even think about going down that road.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> News and Current Events All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
Page 2 of 4

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2009, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art