Page 25 of 27 [ 419 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27  Next

Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,439
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

09 Dec 2011, 5:22 pm

androbot2084 wrote:
Under Capitalism workers are machines and must run under the cheapest fuel possible.


to me that would be a good reason not to support capitalism.


_________________
We won't go back.


androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

09 Dec 2011, 6:01 pm

Capitalists love money.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

10 Dec 2011, 6:47 pm

dmm1010 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Well I would hope not...it sounded like that's what was being suggested though. and since when is the government robbing the rich at gun point to feed the poor, no one has suggested that either. and what about people who are working and still cannot afford an adequate amount of food......back to the whole assumption that if you work your automatically going to be able to afford everything you need......when that is not really the case anymore.

Taxes, irrespective of their necessity, are tantamount to robbery at gunpoint. If you refuse to pay your taxes the government sends men with guns to lock you up in prison for a long time.

This is such a BS claim. I've heard people say that 'taxed are slavery,' which is worse; it's the equivalent of saying that contributing your fair shair is actually unfair. I'd hate to have a housemate with this attitude - they'd probably claim that it was robbery to be expected to pay their share of the rent and utilities or be kicked out.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

10 Dec 2011, 7:36 pm

androbot2084 wrote:
Capitalists love money.


So do Socialists which is why they tax the Capitalists.

ruveyn



dmm1010
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 253
Location: Salem, WI, US

10 Dec 2011, 8:58 pm

LKL wrote:
This is such a BS claim. I've heard people say that 'taxed are slavery,' which is worse; it's the equivalent of saying that contributing your fair shair is actually unfair. I'd hate to have a housemate with this attitude - they'd probably claim that it was robbery to be expected to pay their share of the rent and utilities or be kicked out.

Only taxes that go toward funding those services whence all citizens benefit (e.g., fire protection, military, police, etc.) can be reasonably compared to sharing of the cost of rent and utilities by the occupants of a dwelling.



mcg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 538
Location: Sacramento

10 Dec 2011, 9:24 pm

LKL wrote:
dmm1010 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Well I would hope not...it sounded like that's what was being suggested though. and since when is the government robbing the rich at gun point to feed the poor, no one has suggested that either. and what about people who are working and still cannot afford an adequate amount of food......back to the whole assumption that if you work your automatically going to be able to afford everything you need......when that is not really the case anymore.

Taxes, irrespective of their necessity, are tantamount to robbery at gunpoint. If you refuse to pay your taxes the government sends men with guns to lock you up in prison for a long time.

This is such a BS claim. I've heard people say that 'taxed are slavery,' which is worse; it's the equivalent of saying that contributing your fair shair is actually unfair. I'd hate to have a housemate with this attitude - they'd probably claim that it was robbery to be expected to pay their share of the rent and utilities or be kicked out.
Your analogy is terrible. Housing tenants voluntarily sign contracts obliging them to pay money in exchange for shelter. I signed no such contract obliging me to pay the government. If you don't pay what they say, they come to your house with guns and arrest you. The only distinction between taxes and robbery is that taxes are collected by the government.



petitesouris
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

10 Dec 2011, 9:30 pm

While the tea party is sometimes difficult to respect, they, at least, did not so consistently defile their cause. These occupiers are nothing short of delinquents, arsonists, pillagers, and demented exibitionists. This circus is a discouraging sight for utopians since we must finally come to the admission that utopian causes are abused by dysfunctional and irresponsible people. With everything being destroyed under the weight of both dysfunction and inevitable corruption supported by the government, the only hope is to create as much as possible from nothing.



Last edited by petitesouris on 11 Dec 2011, 9:28 am, edited 10 times in total.

dmm1010
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 253
Location: Salem, WI, US

10 Dec 2011, 9:35 pm

mcg wrote:
Your analogy is terrible. Housing tenants voluntarily sign contracts obliging them to pay money in exchange for shelter. I signed no such contract obliging me to pay the government. If you don't pay what they say, they come to your house with guns and arrest you. The only distinction between taxes and robbery is that taxes are collected by the government.

I guess he believes that's implicitly agreed upon in the "social contract." Never mind of course that contracts, "social" or otherwise, aren't signed by force or threat thereof.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

10 Dec 2011, 9:41 pm

mcg wrote:
Your analogy is terrible. Housing tenants voluntarily sign contracts obliging them to pay money in exchange for shelter. I signed no such contract obliging me to pay the government. If you don't pay what they say, they come to your house with guns and arrest you. The only distinction between taxes and robbery is that taxes are collected by the government.

Cry me a river. The very act of keeping records that your land property belongs to you requires government expenses and that's just the beginning. If you own a house, government provides to you many implicit services. You would be stealing from society if you didn't pay taxes.

You can opt out of the services, but then good luck ensuring that a mob does not just outpower you and decide they live in your place because you would have no record that you own that stuff. And good luck also getting the government to build pipelines to connect your house to the water system. Etc, etc, etc.


_________________
.


LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

11 Dec 2011, 3:44 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
You would be stealing from society if you didn't pay taxes.

qft



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

11 Dec 2011, 3:47 am

androbot2084 wrote:
Under Capitalism workers are machines and must run under the cheapest fuel possible.


They are also consumers and customers who need to earn enough to buy stuff.

ruveyn



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

11 Dec 2011, 3:51 am

androbot2084 wrote:
Rich people are not entitled to tax breaks.


Neither are poor people.

ruveyn



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

11 Dec 2011, 3:52 am

androbot2084 wrote:
The rich can afford to give up their possessions.


And that is why we should steal from them?

ruveyn



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,439
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

11 Dec 2011, 4:00 am

ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Rich people are not entitled to tax breaks.


Neither are poor people.

ruveyn


I would say they would be more entitled to that then rich people, considering they don't have nearly enough to adequately survive on.


_________________
We won't go back.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,439
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

11 Dec 2011, 4:04 am

ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
The rich can afford to give up their possessions.


And that is why we should steal from them?

ruveyn


Well say I lived in the middle of an area with lots of starving people and had stock piles of food in my house, I would be suprised if someone did not come and steal some food. Now that is not quite what is going on, but it is true a rather small amount of the population has access to the majority of resources while a large amount of the population is not doing so well and is realising the trickle down theory was a lie.....just so those on top could feed off all the labor of those in lower classes. So if they don't want to be stolen from they shouldn't of stole from the people to begin with.


_________________
We won't go back.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

11 Dec 2011, 4:08 am

Sweetleaf wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
The rich can afford to give up their possessions.


And that is why we should steal from them?

ruveyn


Well say I lived in the middle of an area with lots of starving people and had stock piles of food in my house, I would be suprised if someone did not come and steal some food. Now that is not quite what is going on, but it is true a rather small amount of the population has access to the majority of resources while a large amount of the population is not doing so well and is realising the trickle down theory was a lie.....just so those on top could feed off all the labor of those in lower classes. So if they don't want to be stolen from they shouldn't of stole from the people to begin with.


Equal distribution of the assets would bring the economy crashing to the ground.

In every society, in every time, in every land ownership or control of the assets has never been equally distributed. Why? Because it does not work. If a revolution occurred tomorrow that redistributed the assets with a year it would become corrupt and only the few at the head of the Revolution would have most of the control or ownership all in the name of The People.

ruveyn