How many people are seriously afraid of firearms?

Post Reply New Topic

People were just as dangerous to other people before explosively propelled heavy metals.

However, people like to look at an icon; I don't know the reason why they do that. Perhaps it's to protect oneself from the fact that there's people out there who will harm you for personal gain. They often use an object to give themselves an advantage. If there were no firearms, it could be a club; one whack with a club will do the same job as any firearm. These types take you unawares most times, so it doesn't matter if the range of said object is short--spring propelled projectile weapons exist, and they've been used countless times in history (bows).

There's an argument that modern, high capacity weapons equate to large scale murder; that's true, but large scale murder can be inflicted by many means (examples for both are there), and it has been.

Better awareness by teachers and carers on the signs of a potentially violent individual, from as early an age as possible and therapy for that from the same early age, will help more than any restrictions on an object. You can never stop it completely though.

I've noted that the anti-bullying implementations taking place now at schools here, which was never there when I was younger, has helped a lot to create a more peaceful environment to grow up in.

As an aside, my firearms, bows, swords and fists will never harm anyone (there's always self-defense, but I have no bravado and I loathe to hurt another, as they often have no say in it, just like I have no say with my ASD).

Has anyone read the book We Need To Talk About Kevin? In it, Kevin carries out a massacre at his school, killing nine people with a crossbow. And I'm sure that could be done in real life, too.

Again, people are what's scary, not the tools they use.

...Except from that guy who doesn't play by your rules and has a gun anyway. The Swiss are armed to the teeth, yet they don't feel unsafe; nor should they, there's very little crime in Switzerland. Guns aren't the problem.

An armed society is a polite society - Robert Heinlein

That's some blogger talking rubbish. Besides, if you were safe with guns, imagine how much safer you'd be without them.

The logic is simple. You're a criminal, you want to do some crime. Do you bring a gun? If you shoot someone, why? Problem solved as soon as you put yourself in the other guy's shoes.

The problem is if you're worried someone will shoot you, you shoot them first. Remove the guns and the immediate effect is a lot of people get survivable knife wounds. Parts of Glasgow are very 'violent' but the only murders are of gangsters, everyone else just gets glassed.

That blogger backed up what he was saying with multiple studies and statistics, see. So it's got some weight, especially since the latest figures he used were from the EU itself.

If you're a criminal and you want a gun, you'll get a gun. You're a criminal.

Another immediate effect is that law-abiding citizens get shot by criminals because they are sitting ducks and have nothing to defend themselves with.

Crime stats are incomparable unless you know exactly what they're talking about. There's all kinds of political fudging going on. The fact is in Britain there are very few areas you would feel unsafe walking at night, even in London.

Why would you want a gun if you have no reason to use it and it doubles your jail time if you get caught? Criminals having guns isn't the problem until people get shot. People get shot because they have guns.

"Another immediate effect is that law-abiding citizens get shot by criminals because they are sitting ducks and have nothing to defend themselves with."

No, this is exactly what doesn't happen. Think about it.

Last edited by fraac on 26 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

You're joking, right? I dare you to walk about at night in Peckham or Brixton and see what happens if you get your phone out.

Besides, in the areas I just mentioned, people are shot and stabbed at least once a week. Hell, that even happens in the nicer areas of London.

You clearly have no idea what the UK is really like.



Why do you assume the criminal will care? If you lead a life of crime, you know you'd get put in jail for ages if you're ever caught anyway.

I used to live in Brixton. I felt perfectly safe there.

"Why do you assume the criminal will care? If you lead a life of crime, you know you'd get put in jail for ages if you're ever caught anyway."

You aren't putting yourself into the criminal's shoes. You're a drug dealer, an average criminal. Do you want to go down for murder just for defending yourself?

What part, though? Because some parts are a lot worse than others. There are in fact many streets where people are scared to go at night for fear of being attacked and mugged. It happens all the time in London.



You can get life in prison for dealing anyway.

Okay, you're a junkie and you need money urgently. You're going to rob a shop. Imagine how that plays out differently in Britain versus America. If you bring a gun in the British shop, all you have to do is wave it around, the shopkeep doesn't have his own gun behind the counter. Totally safe crime. How many low level robberies become murders of necessity in America?

That's a crime in both countries, though - even if you're in the US and guns are legal, shooting a shopkeeper to rob him obviously isn't, so either way, you face the same risk.

I'm talking about the risk of getting killed or murdering someone and going to jail for life. I don't know what you're talking about.

Again, if we're talking about a criminal, I think that risk is the same, especially if you're a desperate junkie anyway.

That's a complete departure from reality and you know it.