Rocky This dude is one hoopy frood!


Joined: May 02, 2008 Posts: 2096 Location: Uhhh...Not Remulak
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ruveyn wrote: | | Rocky wrote: | If the faithful are the ones who believe that the Bible is literally true, they might not want to risk criticizing the biggest mass murderer in known history.
Criticism might also be mistaken for disbelief, which according to the New Testament, leads to an eternity of torture in Hell. I may have some of the details wrong, since it was quite some time ago that I read that book. |
Poor Job attempted to criticize God and he got a tongue lashing.
ruveyn |
If the god of the Bible treated a good man like Job the way he did, the faithful have one more reason not to push their luck. I agree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Grebels Toucan


Joined: Mar 06, 2012 Posts: 270
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Inspite of the title of this forum, I am not at all sure it is possible to have a serious discussion on the subject here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Ragtime Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006 Age: 34 Posts: 9770 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| abacacus wrote: | That is complete bull
One could make the same argument and say the politicians who banned paedophilia could freely engage in it, because they created the law and as such they are above it. |
Flaw: The politicians create laws which expressly state they are for all people in the state/nation, not certain classes of people therein. God created laws which expressly state they are for all humans, and not for Himself as well.
Also, how would you be able to define being moral when it comes to God? I'll explain what I mean. One law He gave in the Old Testament is not to look upon the nakedness of any family member. Well, being God, he is omnipresent and sees all. So, that moral law would be inapplicable to Him. As would many others. If God kills a human, it's simply reversing His own previous action: creating that human. Whereas, when we murder someone, we violate the Creator's act of having put that person into existence. A person is allowed to inflate, then deflate his own tires; he is not allowed to, after watching someone else inflate their own tires, come over to that person's car and deflate them. Same reasoning goes. God owns us. We do not own each other. Also, his law is not to murder, which is killing for no justifiable reason. Well, when God kills someone, He has His reasons, and being a just God, they are therefore just reasons. _________________ Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Ragtime Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006 Age: 34 Posts: 9770 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Lord_Gareth wrote: | That really coulda been put into a new post for ease of reading. Forum etiquette, my friend. Forum etiquette.
I'll actually address the point later, maybe tonight, more likely tomorrow - for now, I go very shortly to watch Aliens with my wife, and addressing the idea of the nature of moral thought (as far as I think of it) would be a long-ass post indeed.
EDIT: The above was addressed to Ragtime, as Joker ninja'd me like a boss. |
It's generally a good idea to give me at least 2 minutes before responding to what I've just written. This is because I am a frequent editor and elaborator of my own posts, as new thoughts occur to me. _________________ Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Ragtime Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006 Age: 34 Posts: 9770 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| abacacus wrote: |
Okay then, here's a fair trial:
Why did your god command so many atrocities? You know, human sacrifice, the murder of infants, the murder of entire towns or even nations, horrific punishments such as being burned alive, etc. |
I guess if His literally infinite wisdom escapes us, He's guilty.  _________________ Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Oodain big chief wulla bamboom alakaway


Joined: Jan 31, 2011 Age: 23 Posts: 5022 Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ragtime wrote: | | abacacus wrote: |
Okay then, here's a fair trial:
Why did your god command so many atrocities? You know, human sacrifice, the murder of infants, the murder of entire towns or even nations, horrific punishments such as being burned alive, etc. |
I guess if His literally infinite wisdom escapes us, He's guilty.  |
we have to take your wqord and that of a 2000 old book for that wisdom however, _________________ //through chaos comes complexity//
the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.
Last edited by Oodain on Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:25 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
abacacus Rock 'N Roll Outlaw


Joined: Apr 16, 2007 Age: 21 Posts: 3323
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MarketAndChurch wrote: |
No, when I say context, I mean that there are two books, the old and the new, and things don't always square up because the old evolved and got a new take when the new came along. One then views the old through the lens of the new, and where there is conflict, one then adopts the new ones interpretation on things, and that is how Christianity made peace with its roots.
Can you name another man who burned his daughter as an offering to God in 4000+ years of Jewish life? What can one possibly learn from this... if there is anything to learn at all... It takes nothing to dump on the bible, any crackpot can cite a verse here and a verse there. Imagine if someone took a few lines from a piece of writing of Shakespeare or Hemingway or Dickens or Orwell out of context and tried to then say that any one of those authors were an idiot, one would immediately demand to know what education they have in literature, or what they degree they hold, but the bible seems free for anyone to dump on without knowing a thing about it. |
Because often those who dump on the bible know it better than the people who follow it. You're the one running around making excuses for things I pull out of the bible, not me. You're the one trying to make your god seem like less a deranged psychopath, going so far as to try and claim translation errors. _________________ A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown. |
|
| Back to top |
|
abacacus Rock 'N Roll Outlaw


Joined: Apr 16, 2007 Age: 21 Posts: 3323
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ragtime wrote: | | abacacus wrote: | That is complete bull
One could make the same argument and say the politicians who banned paedophilia could freely engage in it, because they created the law and as such they are above it. |
Flaw: The politicians create laws which expressly state they are for all people in the state/nation, not certain classes of people therein. God created laws which expressly state they are for all humans, and not for Himself as well.
Also, how would you be able to define being moral when it comes to God? I'll explain what I mean. One law He gave in the Old Testament is not to look upon the nakedness of any family member. Well, being God, he is omnipresent and sees all. So, that moral law would be inapplicable to Him. As would many others. If God kills a human, it's simply reversing His own previous action: creating that human. Whereas, when we murder someone, we violate the Creator's act of having put that person into existence. A person is allowed to inflate, then deflate his own tires; he is not allowed to, after watching someone else inflate their own tires, come over to that person's car and deflate them. Same reasoning goes. God owns us. We do not own each other. Also, his law is not to murder, which is killing for no justifiable reason. Well, when God kills someone, He has His reasons, and being a just God, they are therefore just reasons. |
Your entire argument hinges on the bible being correct, which is not something I'm just going to grant you out of thin air for debate purposes. You are what can be called a religious apologist, AKA "well yes he did terrible things BUT...." I'm sorry, but no matter what way you try and spin it, your god is deranged. He is a sadistic psychopath. He orders people killed in hideous ways for what amounts to thought crime in many cases. What if the government in your country passed a law (hypothetically, it'd be very unlikely to happen) that all those who believed in god should be put to death, as it will get them to god sooner. Would you not fight that? Would you not fight against being killed because of your beliefs? And yet your god commands that you kill me, because I don't believe in fairy tales...
Also, if you think god creates people, I have a little test to you. Pray to your god for a son. See how long it takes that son to show up versus the maybe a year of people who just try and get pregnant.
And, if I recall correctly (I could be wrong), god gave his law to the Israelites... not all of mankind. _________________ A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Vigilans Orgasm Donor


Joined: Jun 20, 2008 Age: 24 Posts: 12093 Location: La belle province
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ragtime wrote: | | abacacus wrote: |
Okay then, here's a fair trial:
Why did your god command so many atrocities? You know, human sacrifice, the murder of infants, the murder of entire towns or even nations, horrific punishments such as being burned alive, etc. |
I guess if His literally infinite wisdom escapes us, He's guilty.  |
Your God is wise in the same way a brick is wise _________________ Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do |
|
| Back to top |
|
Ragtime Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006 Age: 34 Posts: 9770 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Personally, I've always wondered why there is so much anger against God from non-believers in Him, yet they have absolutely zero problem with Satan. Satan and his angels, whether you believe in him/them or not, are the primary influences toward pain and suffering in this world. So, non-believers in him not even having a theoretical problem with Satan always strikes me as interesting, particularly when I hear so much vitriol uttered against God by the same people. I could pick from so many examples, but Richard Dawkins comes first to my mind: “The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.” It is exceedingly rare -- if not without parallel -- for a fictional character to inspire such a level of feeling.
I've never heard Satan even described as, say, "bad" by a non-believer. It's just really interesting to me. The author of the Holocaust and all other pain, suffering, and death, not considered even "bad". But God, the creator of us all, and the giver of life (air, food, water, etc, etc, etc, etc) to us all, who expects simple obedience and respect, He's called vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser, misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, and capriciously malevolent.
I'm not confused by this at all, but on the surface it is quite odd. And it is an incorrect reaction by them, to be sure, even though it's understandable. _________________ Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Gravechylde Pileated woodpecker


Joined: Mar 18, 2012 Age: 25 Posts: 196 Location: Funeralopolis
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ragtime wrote: | | Personally, I've always wondered why there is so much anger against God from non-believers in Him, yet they have absolutely zero problem with Satan. |
Well, for one, who has said that they don't have any problems with satan? Just because nonbelievers haven't brought him up doesn't mean that they like/agree with him.
Secondly, no one goes around trying to force satan's laws onto people who don't believe in him. No one who has any political/social merits at least. _________________ I speak with a whisper and feel with a shout |
|
| Back to top |
|
Vigilans Orgasm Donor


Joined: Jun 20, 2008 Age: 24 Posts: 12093 Location: La belle province
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ragtime wrote: | Personally, I've always wondered why there is so much anger against God from non-believers in Him, yet they have absolutely zero problem with Satan. Satan and his angels, whether you believe in him/them or not, are the primary influences toward pain and suffering in this world. So, non-believers in him not even having a theoretical problem with Satan always strikes me as interesting, particularly when I hear so much vitriol uttered against God by the same people. I could pick from so many examples, but Richard Dawkins comes first to my mind: “The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.” It is exceedingly rare -- if not without parallel -- for a fictional character to inspire such a level of feeling.
I've never heard Satan even described as, say, "bad" by a non-believer. It's just really interesting to me. The author of the Holocaust and all other pain, suffering, and death, not considered even "bad". But God, the creator of us all, and the giver of life (air, food, water, etc, etc, etc, etc) to us all, who expects simple obedience and respect, He's called vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser, misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, and capriciously malevolent.
I'm not confused by this at all, but on the surface it is quite odd. And it is an incorrect reaction by them, to be sure, even though it's understandable. |
Satan was not the "author" of the holocaust. Or anything. Human beings were. Should I be outraged at a pseudo-deity that does not exist or at the NSDAP? Dawkins was right about the god of the Old Testament. Highly immoral and vindictive. As well as nonexistent _________________ Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do |
|
| Back to top |
|
Ragtime Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006 Age: 34 Posts: 9770 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rocky wrote: | | ruveyn wrote: | | Rocky wrote: | If the faithful are the ones who believe that the Bible is literally true, they might not want to risk criticizing the biggest mass murderer in known history.
Criticism might also be mistaken for disbelief, which according to the New Testament, leads to an eternity of torture in Hell. I may have some of the details wrong, since it was quite some time ago that I read that book. |
Poor Job attempted to criticize God and he got a tongue lashing.
ruveyn |
If the god of the Bible treated a good man like Job the way he did, the faithful have one more reason not to push their luck. I agree. |
How utterly unsurprising that you'd both end the story while Job is at his worst condition, rather than alluding to how things turned out:
From Job 42:
| Quote: |
10 After Job had prayed for his friends, the LORD restored his fortunes and gave him twice as much as he had before.
11 All his brothers and sisters and everyone who had known him before came and ate with him in his house. They comforted and consoled him over all the trouble the LORD had brought on him, and each one gave him a piece of silver and a gold ring.
12 The LORD blessed the latter part of Job’s life more than the former part. He had fourteen thousand sheep, six thousand camels, a thousand yoke of oxen and a thousand donkeys.
13 And he also had seven sons and three daughters.
14 The first daughter he named Jemimah, the second Keziah and the third Keren-Happuch.
15 Nowhere in all the land were there found women as beautiful as Job’s daughters, and their father granted them an inheritance along with their brothers.
16 After this, Job lived a hundred and forty years; he saw his children and their children to the fourth generation.
17 And so Job died, an old man and full of years.
|
Wow, God sure is cruel. _________________ Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Gravechylde Pileated woodpecker


Joined: Mar 18, 2012 Age: 25 Posts: 196 Location: Funeralopolis
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ragtime wrote: | How utterly unsurprising that you'd both end the story while Job is at his worst condition, rather than alluding to how things turned out:
From Job 42:
| Quote: |
10 After Job had prayed for his friends, the LORD restored his fortunes and gave him twice as much as he had before.
11 All his brothers and sisters and everyone who had known him before came and ate with him in his house. They comforted and consoled him over all the trouble the LORD had brought on him, and each one gave him a piece of silver and a gold ring.
12 The LORD blessed the latter part of Job’s life more than the former part. He had fourteen thousand sheep, six thousand camels, a thousand yoke of oxen and a thousand donkeys.
13 And he also had seven sons and three daughters.
14 The first daughter he named Jemimah, the second Keziah and the third Keren-Happuch.
15 Nowhere in all the land were there found women as beautiful as Job’s daughters, and their father granted them an inheritance along with their brothers.
16 After this, Job lived a hundred and forty years; he saw his children and their children to the fourth generation.
17 And so Job died, an old man and full of years.
|
Wow, God sure is cruel. |
Is that like when a husband beats his wife for talking back to him and then he turns around and starts saying how sorry he is and how much he loves her, and didn't mean to hurt her, then takes her out to dinner, buys her new clothes, etc? _________________ I speak with a whisper and feel with a shout |
|
| Back to top |
|
Joker Sinn Fein


Joined: Mar 20, 2011 Age: 24 Posts: 7593 Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Unspecified wrote: | | Joker wrote: | | abacacus wrote: | SO what you're essentially saying is "god is the father and he knows best but I know better than him"?  |
No I am saying that you will not find christians that follow the old convenent laws unless they are a funny
|
Except when it comes to gays, of course. |
Um the only reason the bible says it is a sin for a man to lay with another man is because it was the pharisees who made it a law not God. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|