| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kalister1
Phoenix
Joined: Sep 09, 2007
Posts: 2882
Location: California
|
 Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| slowmutant wrote: | | The Church doesn't have to bend over for gays. And I don't want to see it bend over. Why don't the gays have their own churches and stop trying to push their buggery on heterosexual churchgoers? |
While we're at it, why don't the blacks and mexicans have their own churches?! 
_________________
Warghh!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
skafather84
Platypus God
Joined: Mar 21, 2006
Age: 24
Posts: 4663
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slowmutant wrote: | | The Church doesn't have to bend over for gays. And I don't want to see it bend over. Why don't the gays have their own churches and stop trying to push their buggery on heterosexual churchgoers? |
they're not. they either get married at a church that's gay-friendly or have a secular marriage without any church at all.
it has nothing to do with the f***ing church. only the church goers are bitching about it because it's their religious right to be a bunch of biggotted cunts for no other reason than their imaginary friend who hates fags. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Awesomelyglorious
Destroyer of worlds, reaver of souls
Joined: Dec 18, 2005
Posts: 5707
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slowmutant wrote: | | The Church doesn't have to bend over for gays. And I don't want to see it bend over. Why don't the gays have their own churches and stop trying to push their buggery on heterosexual churchgoers? |
They can and to some extent they already are getting their own churches as certain religious groups do not have a stigma for homosexuality. Frankly, I agree nobody should push buggery on anyone.
| Kalister1 wrote: |
While we're at it, why don't the blacks and mexicans have their own churches?! |
They already do to some extent and there is even a black theology in existence in more radical groups. To be honest, I would advise them not to go to a church with racial doctrines just like I would not advise a person who practices homosexuality to go into a conservative Christian church. Like, honestly, why can't any group have a church based upon their preferences? Other churches may not accept it, but still the liberty that exists should allow for people to pursue their own diverse ideas in freedom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla
Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 2033
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Goodbye America 
And Awesomlyglorious, there's a Gay and Lesbian church in my city. It looks more like an organization in a suite though. I used to work around the area. I can't forget the mean looking lady in an El Camino, or the flamboyant male in his Celica listening to techno.
Stereotypes? Where?!?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Orwell
Outer Party Member
Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 3666
Location: Room 101
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wasn't aware California had a gay-marriage ban. I was under the impression that Cal was about as liberal as you could get in the USA.
Here in Ohio, we passed a constitutional amendment whereby we not only banned gay marriages, but also refuse to recognize as valid gay marriages performed in other states. Completely against the privileges and immunities clause in Article 4, but no one's challenged it yet.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH |
|
| Back to top |
|
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla
Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 2033
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Orwell wrote: | I wasn't aware California had a gay-marriage ban. I was under the impression that Cal was about as liberal as you could get in the USA.
Here in Ohio, we passed a constitutional amendment whereby we not only banned gay marriages, but also refuse to recognize as valid gay marriages performed in other states. Completely against the privileges and immunities clause in Article 4, but no one's challenged it yet. |
It was banned but not constitutionally. |
|
| Back to top |
|
slowmutant
FAITH HOPE LOVE
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Age: 29
Posts: 6667
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | it has nothing to do with the f***ing church. only the church goers are bitching about it because it's their religious right to be a bunch of biggotted cunts for no other reason than their imaginary friend who hates fags. |
Eloquent as always. That's why we love you, skafather. Who else would point out the bigotted cunts and fag-hating imginary frends?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Orwell
Outer Party Member
Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 3666
Location: Room 101
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oscuria wrote: | | Orwell wrote: | I wasn't aware California had a gay-marriage ban. I was under the impression that Cal was about as liberal as you could get in the USA.
Here in Ohio, we passed a constitutional amendment whereby we not only banned gay marriages, but also refuse to recognize as valid gay marriages performed in other states. Completely against the privileges and immunities clause in Article 4, but no one's challenged it yet. |
It was banned but not constitutionally. |
No, the ban was written in to an amendment to the Ohio state constitution. If you're referring to it not being constitutional because of being inconsistent with the federal constitution, I agree.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH |
|
| Back to top |
|
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla
Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 2033
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Orwell wrote: | | oscuria wrote: | | Orwell wrote: | I wasn't aware California had a gay-marriage ban. I was under the impression that Cal was about as liberal as you could get in the USA.
Here in Ohio, we passed a constitutional amendment whereby we not only banned gay marriages, but also refuse to recognize as valid gay marriages performed in other states. Completely against the privileges and immunities clause in Article 4, but no one's challenged it yet. |
It was banned but not constitutionally. |
No, the ban was written in to an amendment to the Ohio state constitution. If you're referring to it not being constitutional because of being inconsistent with the federal constitution, I agree. |
I actually had in mind California. But if you agree with me then it's all good.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Orwell
Outer Party Member
Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 3666
Location: Room 101
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oscuria wrote: | | I actually had in mind California. But if you agree with me then it's all good. |
Oh, referring to the California ban. I'm still very surprised to hear that California would ever have banned gay marriage. How did that even come about?
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH |
|
| Back to top |
|
CityAsylum
Venio. Exeunt omnes.
Joined: Jan 08, 2008
Posts: 3512
Location: NYC
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slowmutant wrote: | | Why don't the gays have their own churches and stop trying to push their buggery on heterosexual churchgoers? |
Point well taken - we should leave the buggery to the preachers and priests, especially since they don't audaciously demand to be "married as partners in the eyes of God" to those kids they are buggering. 
Oh, wait - that's not funny; that's tragic, I forgot!
Did you forget, too?
_________________
I'm as puzzled as a newborn child |
|
| Back to top |
|
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla
Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 2033
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Orwell wrote: | | oscuria wrote: | | I actually had in mind California. But if you agree with me then it's all good. |
Oh, referring to the California ban. I'm still very surprised to hear that California would ever have banned gay marriage. How did that even come about? |
People voted for it...right?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
slowmutant
FAITH HOPE LOVE
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Age: 29
Posts: 6667
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, it is tragic. Gays have no social conscience, is that it? Being a repulsive human being won't help your cause. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Kalister1
Phoenix
Joined: Sep 09, 2007
Posts: 2882
Location: California
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slowmutant wrote: | | Yes, it is tragic. Gays have no social conscience, is that it? Being a repulsive human being won't help your cause. |
You're a piece of sh**.
_________________
Warghh!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
CityAsylum
Venio. Exeunt omnes.
Joined: Jan 08, 2008
Posts: 3512
Location: NYC
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slowmutant wrote: | | Yes, it is tragic. Gays have no social conscience, is that it? Being a repulsive human being won't help your cause. |
*Whoosh* - that just sailed right over your head!
Gay people who marry each other are not the problem - they just want to be with each other in loving relationships.
'Heterosexual' Men of God are performing buggery on the innocents, and they are your holy men - so when you do bend over, make sure you aren't in your church when you do it. Don't they bother you at all, or is it OK because Jesus forgives them for straying from the path?
Gay people aren't the ones you have to watch out for, and that won't be apparent to you until one of your hetero spiritual leaders pokes you in your tail with a thing that isn't a stick. 
_________________
I'm as puzzled as a newborn child |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
