Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop | Search
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats
   Members: 21,198
   Online Now: 256



People Online:
Visitors: 162
Members: 94
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 17
Latest: Doomcookie

Search
Google
Web WP.net



  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
California overturned gay-marriage ban today!
Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
slowmutant
Templar Knight


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 5121
Location: Ontario Canada

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I couldn't have put it better myself. Nice metaphor.
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ragtime
Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 7392
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:

2) This is one of my problems with the government, since it is in charge of acknowledging marriage currently. If they were really honest about it, they'd punish those who broke the legal contract.


It's interesting to me that, as solemnly as marriage vows are taken (ahem, said anyway) in the U.S.,
adultery isn't even on the books as being wrong!
Yet we can be heavily fined for littering, not wearing our seatbelts, or for drinking alcohol when we're 20 years old.
Rolling Eyes
It's amazing how many tiny things are both on the books and quite punishable indeed,
while major things like leaving your wife and children for a bimbo are fully allowed (provided you cover them financially),
and hardly even frowned at.
So, married men, if you're tired of your old family, and want a new one, or just even some bimbo,
just save up, pay them off, and off you go!
What a horrible state of affairs! Evil or Very Mad
(No pun intended.)


Last edited by Ragtime on Tue May 20, 2008 6:26 pm; edited 7 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
slowmutant
Templar Knight


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 5121
Location: Ontario Canada

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adultery may not be a crimimanl offense, but it IS frowned upon by most people, ie. the moral majority.
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ragtime
Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 7392
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.

Do you have dismissive sarcastic comments for the rest of my points?


You can be assured that he does.
If anything, skafather has dismissive sarcastic comments.
_________________
Anyone who is interested in philosophy, the of meaning of life, and answers to our hardest questions, I suggest you check out the free, online mp3 archive of Ravi Zacharias at www.rzim.org.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ragtime
Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 7392
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

slowmutant wrote:
Adultery may not be a crimimanl offense, but it IS frowned upon by most people, ie. the moral majority.


I know it is, but to little effect. Sad to say, adultery is nothing less than rampantly occurring,
both in and out of the church.
That has to be admitted if our country is going to make progress toward
promoting stronger individual moral conciences.
_________________
Anyone who is interested in philosophy, the of meaning of life, and answers to our hardest questions, I suggest you check out the free, online mp3 archive of Ravi Zacharias at www.rzim.org.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
skafather84
Platypus God


Joined: Mar 21, 2006
Age: 23
Posts: 4475
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ragtime wrote:
Orwell wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.

Do you have dismissive sarcastic comments for the rest of my points?


You can be assured that he does.
If anything, skafather has dismissive sarcastic comments.



and you can always be counted on for pure stupidity and ignorance...so it works out! i have someone to use my sarcasm on and you have a place to spout off your hateful ignorance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Ragtime
Legal Eagle Eye


Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 7392
Location: Dallas, Texas

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skafather84 wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Orwell wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
The US was founded on Christian principles.



yeah because the majority of the deists were heavy into christianity.

Do you have dismissive sarcastic comments for the rest of my points?


You can be assured that he does.
If anything, skafather has dismissive sarcastic comments.



and you can always be counted on for pure stupidity and ignorance...so it works out! i have someone to use my sarcasm on and you have a place to spout off your hateful ignorance.


Oh no, not more false equivalency!



Nice try though.
_________________
Anyone who is interested in philosophy, the of meaning of life, and answers to our hardest questions, I suggest you check out the free, online mp3 archive of Ravi Zacharias at www.rzim.org.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Awesomelyglorious
Destroyer of worlds, reaver of souls


Joined: Dec 18, 2005
Posts: 5496
Location: United States

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ragtime wrote:

Your views are becoming ever more flexible, AG.
Why, just today, you abandoned the distinction between logic and insanity:

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Ragtime wrote:

Logic, insanity... it's all the same to you.

Logic is merely the apologetics of madness.

My views? I have been neither a liberal nor a conservative for a few years now. Not only that, but I don't uphold the distinction between logic and insanity to any great extent. Yes, I can accept the existence of a certain processing technique that follows a set of rules, however, as I have stated before, and many times before, the human psyche is driven by deeper set emotions and ultimately objectivity is not something we can attain. Look, if you really look at my views in depth, you will find that I merely say some things to be absurd, I say other things to advance my epistemology, and the actual core beliefs are rather out of the ordinary as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
srriv345
Velociraptor
Velociraptor


Joined: Jul 19, 2006
Age: 21
Posts: 414

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ragtime wrote:

A red herring -- from what? "Red herring" have to distract from something.
But the subject of this thread is singular -- namely, addressing the question
of whether or not marriage is changing.
I said that in the opening post, that such was the only question I was asking.
To determine whether or not your car is rolling slowly or standing still,
you look out the window. This thread is only about looking out the window.


No, actually, that was the subject of the other thread. This thread's OP announces a single change in legal marriage in the state of California.

Developing "strong individual consciousness" is good (I guess, depending on what you mean), but makes for incredibly invasive public policy. It's one thing to say "adultery is wrong," and quite another to decide what ought to be done about it. I think adultery is wrong, but I don't want the government getting involved and I don't want to engage in simplistic black/white distinctions between individuals. Real life is more complicated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Griff
Phoenix
Phoenix


Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 1615

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 8:29 pm    Post subject: Re: California overturned gay-marriage ban today! Reply with quote

Averick wrote:
It's only a matter of time before "californiacation" effects us all.
First it was Massachusetts, now them. In time, all fifty-two states
will allow gay marriage.

Sorry my fundalmentalist brethren.
We now have fifty-seven states, Averick. Barrack Obama said so. See? I can josh the guy. Anyway, only fifty of them are actually considered states. In fact, I think that at least one of those is actually considered a "commonwealth," so it's arguably less if you're keen on silly sophistry.

Now we've got our book-ends. It won't take long for the rest of the nation to follow. Hopefully, from here, the US will finally begin taking leadership on these issues again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slowmutant
Templar Knight


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 5121
Location: Ontario Canada

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Real life has many shades of gray, but any rules we make ought to have no room for ambivalence. Murder, theft, adultery, etc. all these are prohibited acts. Not for a few, but for all. Not some of the time, but all of the time. Not just here, but everywhere.
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Orwell
Outer Party Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 3206
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

slowmutant wrote:
Real life has many shades of gray, but any rules we make ought to have no room for ambivalence. Murder, theft, adultery, etc. all these are prohibited acts. Not for a few, but for all. Not some of the time, but all of the time. Not just here, but everywhere.

I concur. Ambiguous rules just beg for trouble, and some things can be considered absolute.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oscuria
Verbal Guerrilla


Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 1966

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orwell wrote:

I concur. Ambiguous rules just beg for trouble, and some things can be considered absolute.


I'm "sickened" by the Congressmen who say "Harsher Penalties! MORE MORE MORE!" for crimes, but when their own children/relatives are accused they are before the judge pleading "It was only a mistake. Please, just let him go!"


They always change their minds when it comes to relatives.
_________________
The above view subject to change.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orwell
Outer Party Member


Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 3206
Location: Room 101

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oscuria wrote:
Orwell wrote:

I concur. Ambiguous rules just beg for trouble, and some things can be considered absolute.


I'm "sickened" by the Congressmen who say "Harsher Penalties! MORE MORE MORE!" for crimes, but when their own children/relatives are accused they are before the judge pleading "It was only a mistake. Please, just let him go!"


They always change their minds when it comes to relatives.

Or themselves. My Governor a few years back broke a couple bribery laws that he had personally pushed through, and then argued that he had made a mistake because he didn't understand the law. Rolling Eyes He had forced other public officials to resign for similar offenses just prior to his crimes being discovered, but then retained his own office until the end of his term.

I hate Ohio.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slowmutant
Templar Knight


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 5121
Location: Ontario Canada

PostPosted: Tue May 20, 2008 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those congressmen, whoever they, are bending the law to suit their own interests. Who'd have thunk it?

Obviously tihs is wrong.
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Politics, Philosophy, and Religion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28  Next  
Page 25 of 28

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2008, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art