 
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Xelebes
Velociraptor
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Age: 23
Posts: 492
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 12:32 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| iamnotaparakeet wrote: | | jrknothead wrote: | | shouldn't this go in the religious debate forum? I mean, seriously, i don't consider creationweb a legitimate news source... |
Well, I do consider it thus. |
Maybe a discussion is needed on the defintion of the term, "credible news source." |
|
| Back to top |
|
monty
Phoenix
Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 2518
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Xelebes wrote: | | iamnotaparakeet wrote: | | jrknothead wrote: | | shouldn't this go in the religious debate forum? I mean, seriously, i don't consider creationweb a legitimate news source... |
Well, I do consider it thus. |
Maybe a discussion is needed on the defintion of the term, "credible news source." |
No, Stephen Colbert has already defined 'newsiness' and 'truthiness'. Truthiness: "things that a person claims to know intuitively or "from the gut" without regard to evidence, logic, intellectual examination, or facts." |
|
| Back to top |
|
Triangular_Trees
What is right is sometimes found on the left.
Joined: Jul 18, 2007
Posts: 2053
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jrknothead wrote: | | shouldn't this go in the religious debate forum? I mean, seriously, i don't consider creationweb a legitimate news source... |
it wouldn;t fly there either because no one who understands geology snd erosion would consider entertaining this notion. As I said before look into soil types and how they lay on the land. this is something you learn about in geo 101
I would accept this mans drawing from a 5th grader just learning about erosion. I would not accept it from a 7th grader, as a 7th grader should be studying erosion indepthly enough to know why that picture is inherently wrong |
|
| Back to top |
|
pakled
"Bless his Heart"
Joined: Nov 13, 2007
Age: 51
Posts: 3281
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok...granted (big stretch here)
We melt both polar ice caps, and all the snow on all the mountains, rain for 40 days over the entire earth....
where did all the water come from? and go?
Cephid Variables are the ones used for farther star measurements. Beyond that, I don't know, we didn't cover that in Astronomy class back when I took it...
This is right up there with the political appointee at NASA who went over all their press releases to make sure that 'the big bang' was either preceded or followed by the word 'theory'... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Diamonddavej
Velociraptor
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 457
Location: Ireland
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
The strongest evidence against the "biblical" flood, are the fossil rivers which are found at various levels in the geologic column. They can be seen in the landscape and traced by seismic or magnetic surveying (see below).
Here are fossil river channels buried under a field in England.
And here in the United States; these two river channels are stacked on top of each other, the rivers flowed and were buried again and again. This proves a single flood didn't cause them, instead they took millions of years to form.
Two Fossil river channels. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
