Discussion | Articles | Blogs | Books | Contact Us | Chat | Shop | Search
  WrongPlanet.net
User Stats
   Members: 22,680
   Online Now: 304



People Online:
Visitors: 213
Members: 91
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 21
Latest: mortsttam

Search
Google
Web WP.net



  Aspie Affection
Support Wrong Planet Awareness!
Worst Operating System you ever used?
Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 12, 13, 14  Next  
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Computers, Math, Science, and Technology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
gamefreak
I don't have a monopoly, I'm just competitive


Joined: Dec 31, 2006
Age: 18
Posts: 1176
Location: Spring Hill, Florida

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eggman wrote:
os x


Which Version
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chever
'Mud'


Joined: Aug 22, 2008
Age: 20
Posts: 1668
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Toss up between Vista and NT
_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
gamefreak
I don't have a monopoly, I'm just competitive


Joined: Dec 31, 2006
Age: 18
Posts: 1176
Location: Spring Hill, Florida

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chever wrote:
Toss up between Vista and NT



Windows NT was the revolutionary OS 2000, XP, and Vista were built off of. Yeah it didn't have support for consumer hardware but that was because it was a business OS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chever
'Mud'


Joined: Aug 22, 2008
Age: 20
Posts: 1668
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gamefreak wrote:
chever wrote:
Toss up between Vista and NT



Windows NT was the revolutionary OS 2000, XP, and Vista were built off of. Yeah it didn't have support for consumer hardware but that was because it was a business OS.


I didn't like it because it was unstable

NT: Neolithic Technology
_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
nodice1996
Velociraptor
Velociraptor


Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Age: 12
Posts: 430
Location: Clinton,MI,USA,Earth, The Milky Way, The Universe,Unknown

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

VISTA!!!!! that pig wont work with network printers, makes my system run like its only got a gig of ram, and asks to confirm everything, even microshaft software
_________________
You think I'm strange, you aint seen nothin' yet!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Paddy789
Raven
Raven


Joined: Aug 13, 2008
Posts: 108

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're using a Geforce 6200 as a GPU, of course it's going to run crap for you. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gamefreak
I don't have a monopoly, I'm just competitive


Joined: Dec 31, 2006
Age: 18
Posts: 1176
Location: Spring Hill, Florida

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chever wrote:
gamefreak wrote:
chever wrote:
Toss up between Vista and NT



Windows NT was the revolutionary OS 2000, XP, and Vista were built off of. Yeah it didn't have support for consumer hardware but that was because it was a business OS.


I didn't like it because it was unstable

NT: Neolithic Technology



It was a hell of a lot more stable than Windows 3.1 and 9X.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chever
'Mud'


Joined: Aug 22, 2008
Age: 20
Posts: 1668
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gamefreak wrote:
It was a hell of a lot more stable than Windows 3.1 and 9X.


Comparing something that sucks to something that sucks even more doesn't mean the thing that sucks less doesn't suck.
_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
twoshots
Honorary Vertebrate


Joined: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 2115
Location: NJ

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've decided to scapegoat Vista for my recent computer complete and total f**** (which culminated in a reformatting).

Burn mutha!
_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter."
-Winston Churchill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gamefreak
I don't have a monopoly, I'm just competitive


Joined: Dec 31, 2006
Age: 18
Posts: 1176
Location: Spring Hill, Florida

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chever wrote:
gamefreak wrote:
It was a hell of a lot more stable than Windows 3.1 and 9X.


Comparing something that sucks to something that sucks even more doesn't mean the thing that sucks less doesn't suck.



I just happened to like NT because I used it for several years and got accustomed to it. Windows NT wasn't bloated with cute crap or anything. It was just a Rock Solid OS that was good for Office Work, Security and Web Browsing. Sort of how linux is king right now for that same purpose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Drakilor
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker


Joined: Sep 15, 2006
Posts: 186

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lunix. I hate it. It's never going to go off anyway since you need Windoze to run it, so you might as well use the best OS in existence (why else would it be so popular).
_________________
"Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind; And therefore is winged Cupid painted blind."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Diamonddavej
Velociraptor
Velociraptor


Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 442
Location: Ireland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It had DOS 3.2 with Windows 1.0 on a 286 (it was donated to an astronomy club I worked in). The computer was a heap of bolts, it had an external hard drive, not that it was supposed to be an external HD, there was simply no room left inside the computer, so the HD was balanced precariously next to the case, and held by some blue tack.

One day an error came up in Windows - "Hard Drive read/write failure". I thought the HD broke. No, it was simply full up, there was no warning that the 5 megabyte HD was filling up, it just crashed the OS. I had to delete files using DOS.

P.S. Windows 1.0 was a worse version of Mac classic OS, which it was a clone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Fuzzy
Ack! Thbbbt!


Joined: Mar 31, 2006
Posts: 2081
Location: Alberta Canada

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Drakilor wrote:
Lunix. I hate it. It's never going to go off anyway since you need Windoze to run it.


Explain this totally nonsensical statement.What does windows have to do with running linux?
_________________
davidred writes...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.

"I spent an interesting evening recently with a grain of salt." -Mark V Shaney
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chever
'Mud'


Joined: Aug 22, 2008
Age: 20
Posts: 1668
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gamefreak wrote:
chever wrote:
gamefreak wrote:
It was a hell of a lot more stable than Windows 3.1 and 9X.


Comparing something that sucks to something that sucks even more doesn't mean the thing that sucks less doesn't suck.



I just happened to like NT because I used it for several years and got accustomed to it. Windows NT wasn't bloated with cute crap or anything. It was just a Rock Solid OS that was good for Office Work, Security and Web Browsing. Sort of how linux is king right now for that same purpose.


I did not find it incredibly stable.
_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Paddy789
Raven
Raven


Joined: Aug 13, 2008
Posts: 108

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Odd, it's pretty stable for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wrong Planet Forums Forum Index -> Computers, Math, Science, and Technology All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 12, 13, 14  Next  
Page 9 of 14

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Wrong PlanetTM Copyright 2004-2008, Alex Plank and Yellow Sneaker Media, LLC
Alex Plank  Aspie Affection 

Terms of Service - You must read this as a user of Wrong Planet

RSS Feed Add to Google Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe: Wrong Planet News  Wrong Planet Forums

Privacy Policy

Asperger's is not a disease

fine art