Eric2971 wrote:
I have actually lost count at this point, but I realized a long time ago that it isn't the language that makes for a good programmer. Language is merely a matter of syntax. It is the understanding of patterns and concepts that makes for a real programmer.
As for a lot of the older languages I've seen listed here, well, just as a scholar may understand ancient Hittite, good for bragging rights, but it won't earn you a living.

The question seemed to be more about comparing experiences to satisfy curiosity than about identifying programming skills that are currently in demand... pointing out that some of the languages are obsolete or that the answers to the question don't matter seems unnecessarily negative and I think misses the point of the question.
Also, almost all of the languages mentioned so far are still in active use... even most of the old ones. Only a few are no longer used significantly, and it can still be interesting to see who's used them.
I always find it a little disappointing to see people fresh out of university or whose experience is all in one part of the industry acting like a small set of languages or practices they're familiar with are sensible and denying the validity of everything else... often they don't even seem to realize how common (and often practical) other languages and tools are in other parts of the industry. (That last part might not apply to you, but your post reminded me of it).