Tollorin wrote:
They certainly would have not economised money by cuting money for the painting space shuttle tank, rather they would have kept the white painting adding hundred of pounds of material; can't have the shuttle look bad isn't?
Rather that been made of interchangable pieces spacecraft would be soldered in one piece. If a piece is failing, it's too bad but you have to replace the whole spacecraft.
Rather that ugly command boards full of ugly switchs and things in the cockpit... There would be only a few touchscreen, greatly increasing the complexity of the onboard electronics and softwares, which in turn greatly increase the propability of failure of critical systems.
And about the radiators, we can't let that ruining the so important design. Hide the radiators in the struscture. The astronauts and critical systems are cooking inside? That's just too bad, but design is IMPORTANT.
All Hail to private industry!! !
All true. But at least if it was run by Apple it would get a decent amount of funding, however pointless.
It seems that a space program run by Apple would be the polar opposite of the current one: our government-funded space program is exceedingly low on funds but does a remarkable job considering (and the shuttles don't look particularly pretty), while a space program run by Apple would get lots of money but would not work very well (and the shuttles would look fantastic).
Apple's philosophy works great on computers, but not on exploration.
_________________
Feel free to PM me. I don't bite!