ruveyn wrote:
Jono wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
String theory may turn out to be a loser.
Maybe, we'll see. We'll probably eventually get another theory of everything or quantum gravity if that turns out to be the case.
We have been waiting to see for over 30 years.
Quantum Theory which overturned classical mechanics and classical electro dynamics took less than 30 years to win its day.
So far the bulk of experimental physics supports the Standard Model of Fields and Particles which is an elaboration of the quantum theory that emerged from the Brow of Zeus around 1926.
ruveyn
Some of the initial predictions of quantum mechanics were not out of reach of the then current technology, though some quantum effects were. Also, the development of quantum theory started as an attempt to explain black-body radiation, an observed phenomena which could not be explained by classical physics. This is unlike the case for string theory, which is more of an attempt to reconcile two different incompatible theories of physics which are nonetheless both hugely successful as far as empirical evidence is concerned. I don't personally don't think that's necessarily a bad thing though since both the theories special and general relativity as well as quantum field theory initially developed that way as well.
Regarding the fact that we've been waiting more than 30 years, Peter Higgs waited more than 50 years for the Higgs Boson to be discovered.
Also, we already know that the Standard Model of particle physics is not the complete picture. Not only because of observations of things like dark matter, but also because of other details like the fact that the Standard Model on it's own did not predict that neutrinos have mass or that the newly discovered Higgs Boson is similar to but not exactly the same as the Higgs Boson predicted by the Standard Model.