Favorite Space Object(s)?

Post Reply New Topic

What's your favorite space object?

My favorite objects: Black holes and Neutron stars.

Reasons: There's just something mystifying and intriguing about these zombie corpses of dead stars that have long exploded into oblivion in a brilliant supernova, particularly black holes and their capabilities of bending the laws of physics.

Rocky planets, because that's where we are most likely to find life-forms similar to the ones we already know (in my opinion, of course).

Yeah. I often read up on the news regarding our search for the right planet that can support carbon-based lifeforms like us. This planet will only be around for so long, even if we do put our ecological conservation methods to the max potential (i.e. recycling, saving power, etc.)

I like black holes because I like to think about them destroying human beings who fly into or near them. Also, large stars because I like to think about iron in the plasma state.

Magnetars!

they are so extraordinary in every respect

they excite my mind

Pulsars, Neutron stars & spiral galaxies; I see neutrinos as the best way of obtaining a firsthand spatial perspective of the universe and all the physical relations within it. Spiral galaxies deviate somewhat from this system of reasoning due to the gravity waves traversing their arms.

_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos

Magnetars are pretty powerful neutron stars, considering they have a magnetic field capable of sucking all the iron out of your blood from 100 miles (161 kilometers), leaving your body in a frozen mess of distorted gore.

Each of the listed objects are cool.

But my favorite current obsession is not listed.

My current favorite objects are "brown dwarfs".

Brown dwarfs are theoretical objects that are larger than gas giants (the biggest kind of known planet), but smaller than dwarf stars. Gas giants are built more like the sun than like the earth. And the ones in our solar system even generate and radiate modest amounts of heat (though its generated via chemical means, and not via nuclear nuclear fushion).

Brown dwarfs, if they exist, would also emit heat (via infrared light) but would be below the threshold to be massive enough to have nuclear fushion . Thus they would be intermediate in both mass, and in 'behavior', between gas giants and small true stars.

Like black holes brown dwarfs are known to exist only in theory. But also like black holes there are odd objects astronomers have found in space that are strong contenders to be actual specimens.

Would it be accurate to think of gas(Hydrogen) planets on a continuum WITH stars??

Gas planets being collections of gas that never reached the mass required for fusion to occur.
Stars being gas giant planets that became massive enough for fusion to occur.

I vote to add a slot for KBOs, too. If there had been one, I would have given them a vote.

I'd like to add them. Unfortunately, though, I can't seem to figure out how to edit a poll and the original thread.