mikibacsi1124 wrote:
I hate to be the voice of dissent, but I really don't care for all this speculation about which movie characters might be Aspies. IMHO, if a character wasn't written to have AS, then they don't have AS.
EDIT: Please note that I don't mean this as a knock at you guys, and feel free to continue speculating. I'm just expressing my $.02 on the matter.
I kind of disagree with you, in that sometimes characters are written with traits that the writers have seen in people they know (or themselves). They get some very believable characters this way, and if the traits they're portraying are from an undiagnosed autistic person, then they could have a very believable autistic/Aspie character.
Sometimes, if someone is written to be AS, even if the person writing knows a lot of autistic people, it seems as if they throw in everything but the kitchen sink to make the point ther person is AS. It seemed the kid in "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time" had every conceivable AS trait--does any one Aspie ever have that many traits? (Although that's an excellent book and I don't mean to put the author down in any way.)
Also the Aspie character Jerry "Hands" Espenson (spelling?) in "Boston Legal": He seems over the top for an adult Aspie, especially in his initial presentation. It's like the writers want to point out "This guy is Asperger's! Asperger's people are weird!" or something.