TrueDave wrote:
brfandan wrote:
ive always had a problem with anime. in most animes ive seen, there is barely 20% the amount of actual animation as most other cartoons have, anime just feels cheap to me. there are a lot of static shots of characters standing still, and when they speak only their mouths move, there are usually no body movements which would occur in real life. this is not what animation should be at all, i feel like i am watching a very detailed storyboard at times, i sometimes would rather read the manga because i feel i would get more out of it. a lot of anime is also very very similar. though there are some well done animes out there, they are very few and far between.
some great ones would be Death Note (mainly for the story), Akira (great animation and visuals), cowboy bebop, and samurai champloo.
I agree, compare it to the original superman cartoons of the 40s! Classic.
The stories dont make any sense either. Its all so overly dramatic I cant buy a bit of it.
Limited animation is its own artform. Comparitively speaking, anime is made on a shoestring budget as compared with classic American animation of the Golden Age (which were made and sold to theaters). The Japanese make up for this using these hundreds of tricks to simulate motion and emotion.
To say that animation isn't supposd to be like that is to ignore the possibilities of animation. It can literally be anything. I personally prefer that animation break free of the constraints of realistic motion.
I actually think Japan sucks when it tries to go beyond limited animation. For the most part I find their character animation to be laughable. But their limited animation is brilliant.