Jamesy wrote:
Funny you guys are making fun of me becasue none of you guys really have much of an idea about what makes a genuine good movie that will appeal to everyone.
no, we are making fun of you because you are stupid. jason stathem as batman, right. as xenu said,
Xenu wrote:
you seem to believe that movies are just to entertain and nothing else. Well you could not be more wrong! Sure movies are there to entertain but they are also there to make you think, or to get a point across. I honestly believe if you go into film we will have another Uwe Boll in our hands. You honestly don't have the slightest clue about film or what makes them good or enjoyable. You seem to be the type of person who isn't able to comprehend anything more than explosions and fart jokes. You may be attempting to go into film but that sure as hell doesn't mean you know anything about it.
Jamesy wrote:
Nolans bat films are for goths and emo's in my opinion.
no, they are for hardcore batman fans. schumacher's films are for queers and 5 year olds. and what is your fascination with batman appealing to kids? you are 20 years old, right?
Jamesy wrote:
You know something Ledgers character in the Dark Knight actually reminded me of the two face in batman forever in the way he spoke and acted.
no really not. i don't know what hallucinogen you were taking at the time, but they are NOTHING alike. jones was over the top and silly. ledger was sadistic and scary. ledger was 10 x better than jones