get rid of mr. marks report to the membership

Page 13 of 16 [ 241 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

SeaBright
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,407
Location: Halfway back

29 Jul 2007, 6:05 am

oh geeeeezus


_________________
"I'm sorry Katya, my dear, but where we come from, your what's known as a pet; a not quite human novelty. It's why we brought you.... It's nothing to be ashamed of, my dear, but here you are and here you'll sit."


MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

29 Jul 2007, 6:08 am

SeaBright wrote:
oh geeeeezus

Hi, SeaBright! Long time no see. Where you been hidin'?


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

29 Jul 2007, 6:13 am

SeaBright wrote:
oh geeeeezus


Reminds me of my favored Led Zepplin song.

[gvideo]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4939011199829445872&q=led+zeppelin+in+my+time+of+dying&total=51&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1[/gvideo]



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

29 Jul 2007, 6:26 pm

MrMark wrote:
I proposing a rule that pictures above a certain size will be deleted without warning or explaination. Big ass pictures are just a big pain in the ass, especially with dial-up.

I see the point of doing that, if the pictures that are too big and can't be resized automatically, then deleting them sounds like a better choice, but without doing warnings or explanations? Why?

This is another proposal, but that is just a thought, I don't know if this could really work, instead of deleting those posts, why not just change them and show only the URL for that picture? with a text saying "Picture too big to show, clic on the link below" or something like that.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

29 Jul 2007, 6:31 pm

greenblue wrote:
MrMark wrote:
I proposing a rule that pictures above a certain size will be deleted without warning or explaination. Big ass pictures are just a big pain in the ass, especially with dial-up.

I see the point of doing that, if the pictures that are too big and can't be resized automatically, then deleting them sounds like a better choice, but without doing warnings or explanations? Why?

This is another proposal, but that is just a thought, I don't know if this could really work, instead of deleting those posts, why not just change them and show only the URL for that picture? with a text saying "Picture too big to show, clic on the link below" or something like that.

I like it. The problem is people who can upload megapixels ten times faster than I can download 'em. 100 times if they just the web address.

No need to be concerned. I don't have the tools to deal with these effectively, except to split 'em off.


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


bizarre
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,981
Location: In ur threadz postin cats

30 Jul 2007, 11:45 am

MrMark wrote:
bizarre wrote:
I hope that If Alex makes any new Moderators he choices members who actually are diagnosed with AS like Quatermass. Not people who have some personality disorder like narcissism or borderline.

Since it's common knowledge that I failed to get a diagnosis, (though I did get the information I need to get the diagnosis if I really want it) I assume you're talking about me. Veiled personal attacks are still personal attacks. The second sentence is unnecessary; the first one conveys your point. I'm sure Alex appreciates your input.
[quote]

I was thinking some more about what you said there MrMark about how you failed to get a diagnosis of AS but where diagnosed with NPD "But now you have the information you need to get the diagnosis if I really want it.
Do you mean that you know what answers to give the doctor so you can fool him into thinking you have AS instead of NPD?

And then you go on to say to me that veiled personal attacks are still personal attacks.'' WTF? you had just stated in another post that you were big and tough enough to handle any attacks on yourself and that it is better that ppl attack you then Alex. So go ahead and rip me a new one. or words to that effect.

So why are you getting all high and mighty because people are trying to have a open debate about moderators and trying to silence them by saying they are attacking you? MrMark I think you should say what you mean and mean what you say on a board for Aspergers.


_________________
It are a fact
I know because of my learnings.


calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

30 Jul 2007, 11:53 am

bizarre wrote:
Do you mean that you know what answers to give the doctor so you can fool him into thinking you have AS instead of NPD?


Though I was confused by the way
the DSM is worded, one can apparently
be diagnosed with both. I believe that
would be my situation (along with
bi-polar).



MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

30 Jul 2007, 12:01 pm

bizarre wrote:
MrMark wrote:
bizarre wrote:
I hope that If Alex makes any new Moderators he choices members who actually are diagnosed with AS like Quatermass. Not people who have some personality disorder like narcissism or borderline.

Since it's common knowledge that I failed to get a diagnosis, (though I did get the information I need to get the diagnosis if I really want it) I assume you're talking about me. Veiled personal attacks are still personal attacks. The second sentence is unnecessary; the first one conveys your point. I'm sure Alex appreciates your input.


I was thinking some more about what you said there MrMark about how you failed to get a diagnosis of AS but where diagnosed with NPD "But now you have the information you need to get the diagnosis if I really want it.
Do you mean that you know what answers to give the doctor so you can fool him into thinking you have AS instead of NPD?

And then you go on to say to me that and that it is better that ppl attack you then Alex. So go ahead and rip me a new one. or words to that effect.

So why are you getting all high and mighty because people are trying to have a open debate about moderators and trying to silence them by saying they are attacking you? MrMark I think you should say what you mean and mean what you say on a board for Aspergers.

I do. You should hear what I say and not what you think I say. :wink:
Let me apologize for assuming you were talking about me. Clearly I came to the wrong conclusion.
"veiled personal attacks are still personal attacks.'' WTF? you had just stated in another post that you were big and tough enough to handle any attacks on yourself"
Those two things have nothing to do with each other. I guess that I prefer that attacks not be veiled so there's no misunderstanding.
"it is better that ppl attack you then Alex." It is better that people attack me than other, more vunerable members.
High and mighty? How you reckon'? I said the first sentence conveyed your message and the second was unnecessary. I am being sincere when I say I'm sure Alex appreciates your input, which seems inconsistant (to me) with trying to silence someone. It seems consistant (to me) with trying to encourage someone to share their ideas, even though I disagree with them.


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


bizarre
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,981
Location: In ur threadz postin cats

30 Jul 2007, 12:12 pm

I am talking about you MrMark!! Everytime Alex is out of town you start getting out of control. Threatening members with banning and warnings.


_________________
It are a fact
I know because of my learnings.


MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

30 Jul 2007, 12:20 pm

bizarre wrote:
I am talking about you MrMark!! Everytime Alex is out of town you start getting out of control. Threatening members with banning and warnings.

Oh, so I did come to the correct conclusion. It's so hard to tell sometimes. I've banned people who were not trolls when Alex was out of town once, and then only after waiting a few days anticipating his prompt return. He did not return promptly and no one knew where he was or when he would be back. Anticipating that it might be several more days before he returned, I felt it was necessary to take action. Steps are being taken to ensure that nothing similar happens again.


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

30 Jul 2007, 1:53 pm

MrMark wrote:
Steps are being taken to ensure that nothing similar happens again.

That's because Alex wasn't too happy with your choices, at least that is what he says on his post.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Comet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,290
Location: SpectrumForums.com

30 Jul 2007, 2:53 pm

Im sorry but i dont see the point in it to be honest.



MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

30 Jul 2007, 2:55 pm

COMET wrote:
Im sorry but i dont see the point in it to be honest.

The point in what?


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


rideforever
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 246
Location: Brighton, UK

30 Jul 2007, 3:35 pm

MrMark wrote:
Codependency is as rampant as negativity on this site. They're the most crippling handicaps any of us have to overcome.


Sorry, but anyone who has this as their signature on a support site for Aspies should NOT be a moderator.

Who are you to bandy about your judgements, and to do so so proudly on your signature. Jesus.

Handicaps ????????? Handicaps ? These are people - you are aware there are other people here aren't you ?

Crippling ! !! !! !!? This is a support site, shut your mouth if you can't think of anything nice to say.



MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

30 Jul 2007, 3:39 pm

It's just my opinion.

Nevertheless, I'm sure Alex appreciates your input.


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


Alternative
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,341

30 Jul 2007, 4:00 pm

I want the avatar size to be doubled in size, so it's at a size, not too big, yet not too small. :)

I'm gonna make a poll on this.