get rid of mr. marks report to the membership

Page 3 of 16 [ 241 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 16  Next

calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

24 Jul 2007, 12:22 am

Quatermass wrote:
No offence to MrMark, of course.


Oh, of course not. Snakes are quite noble.

I consider them my kin.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

24 Jul 2007, 12:31 am

Quatermass wrote:
I think Janicka wanted to be demodded as a protest. I wasn't around at the time.


Janicka was asked, as were Starbuline and I,
whether she wanted to be demodded, over a
thread at I2. None of us gave completely resounding
statements, in either direction, but those two fell to
the axe, and I did not.

The banning was a result of her spamming the
forum with links and threads to sopho's site.
I have no idea if she was unbanned since then,
though 'twould seem that, given others who were,
she should have been.

If so, she obviously doesn't see a particular reason
to post here. If not, she probably should be a bit
upset.

After Alex indicated that we had the right to unban members
(unilatterally - which I think was foolish, and hope that y'all
have resolved that; it does seem that it was heading in the
right direction), I offered to unban her temporarily, on her
assurance that she would not do any damage. AFAIK, she did
not respond. This was something she had asked earlier of me,
but I felt that it would have been against my position here.



ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

24 Jul 2007, 12:45 am

calandale wrote:
MrMark wrote:
I suppose some of you prefer the so-called “do-nothing-mods” that others have complained so vocally about.


Interesting. I don't remember many complaints being
addressed about us doing too little, and when they did,
we always had to note that those were Alex's instructions
to us. Perhaps we need an UNDERMODERATION thread
as well?


That sounds odd. because this play was always a pretty nice place, never really needed much moderation, never really felt I had to complain to anyone, then there started being oer moderation, people started retaliating, and it spun out of control.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

24 Jul 2007, 12:50 am

Kinda like a little revolt we
threw against the Brits here,
a while ago. One enjoys the
taste of freedom.

But, Gestapo tactics can work,
if a society is not vigilant. Luckily,
the stakes aren't so high on the
internet, that one can't simply find
someplace freer.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

24 Jul 2007, 2:11 am

Now, what is the conclusion on this thread?
are we gonna get rid of that lovely thread?
I hope not, it would be a great loss.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

24 Jul 2007, 2:13 am

greenblue wrote:
Now, what is the conclusion on this thread?
are we gonna get rid of that lovely thread?
I hope not, it would be a great loss.


It's locked?



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

24 Jul 2007, 2:16 am

It always HAS been.
To prevent comments.



ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

24 Jul 2007, 2:19 am

I figured.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

24 Jul 2007, 2:36 am

calandale wrote:
It always HAS been.
To prevent comments.

Why?
He doesn't like compliments?


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


MrMark
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,918
Location: Tallahassee, FL

24 Jul 2007, 5:39 am

The complete quote:

"A banning is a train, comin’ down the track. A warning is the train whistle.
If you don’t want to get hit by the train, step off the track when you here the whistle.
You can resume your dangerous walk down the track when the train has passed.
Everyone on this site has control of his or her destiny."

I really do believe it, for better or for worse.


_________________
"The cordial quality of pear or plum
Rises as gladly in the single tree
As in the whole orchards resonant with bees."
- Emerson


rideforever
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 246
Location: Brighton, UK

24 Jul 2007, 7:46 am

MrMark wrote:
The complete quote:

"A banning is a train, comin’ down the track. A warning is the train whistle.
If you don’t want to get hit by the train, step off the track when you here the whistle.
You can resume your dangerous walk down the track when the train has passed.
Everyone on this site has control of his or her destiny."

I really do believe it, for better or for worse.



Should Mods be threatening members with being hit by a train ?

=Exactly the Wrong Attitude



Graelwyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,601
Location: Hants, Uk

24 Jul 2007, 7:47 am

Quote:
Her position as
a moderator made everything far more complicated.


And what exactly do you mean by that, since you are discussing me like some sort of piece of meat here.
Actually, it is irrelevant now what people like you think. I have my own life beyond this...place, lol.
This is a just a bloody forum, not the real world.
And if the greatest accolade you guys can reach is being a moderator on some poxy forum...well :lol: Enjoy your one little piece of control over the world.
I sit back and it just looks so funny looking at the way you all are on here, from an objective point of view.
I imagine those visiting have a good laugh.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

24 Jul 2007, 8:19 am

Graelwyn wrote:
Quote:
Her position as
a moderator made everything far more complicated.


And what exactly do you mean by that, since you are discussing me like some sort of piece of meat here.


Because, in my view, as expressed in many places,
mods have to be able to be criticized to a degree greater
than we could allow to normal members. Now, not only
were you subjected to a very high level of such attack
(some of which was even over the line for me - but
linked to the issues of your moderating style), but you
were also unable to cope with those attacks. Hey, I wasn't
subjected to that level (though close), so I don't know how
I would have reacted.

Still, it complicated the issue.
Quote:
Actually, it is irrelevant now what people like you think. I have my own life beyond this...place, lol.
This is a just a bloody forum, not the real world.


Grael, I think you are a beautiful person.
I just don't think that you had the toughness
to handle the constant harassment the position
entails. Maybe my resignation is because of something
similar. It drained me - having to fight so damned hard
for what I thought was clear, and what I believed worked
best here. I just hope that it doesn't fall apart again.



Graelwyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,601
Location: Hants, Uk

24 Jul 2007, 8:28 am

Quote:
Because, in my view, as expressed in many places,
mods have to be able to be criticized to a degree greater
than we could allow to normal members. Now, not only
were you subjected to a very high level of such attack
(some of which was even over the line for me - but
linked to the issues of your moderating style), but you
were also unable to cope with those attacks. Hey, I wasn't
subjected to that level (though close), so I don't know how
I would have reacted.


A moderator, in my opinion, and this is just my opinion, on any board, should be seen to be human. Human beings do react to things, human beings do have feelings...well most do, anyway. I never saw the logic in having moderators who were to set some sort of example and appear to be perfection. I find it silly that people always have to have this sort of example to look up to, reminding them of their own imperfections. I am well aware that my view on that differs to the view of others. For me, a more human mod was always more approachable. I would never approach and do not bother to approach mods who seem too controlled and perfect to be true.


Quote:
Grael, I think you are a beautiful person.
I just don't think that you had the toughness
to handle the constant harassment the position
entails. Maybe my resignation is because of something
similar. It drained me - having to fight so damned hard
for what I thought was clear, and what I believed worked
best here. I just hope that it doesn't fall apart again.


I think what bothers me most, is that knowing that I had those issues of sensitivity, a certain few still saw fit to lay into me at many opportunities. I believe I am correct to maintain my cynical view of human beings, aspie or otherwise. My experiences here proved that so. I am glad I am not a mod.
I resent the reason given me by another 'mod' for not being a mod any longer.
But I always maintained, it really meant little to me in terms of a position.
Safer to view the net as something beyond real life...and its members as nothing more than names and typing on a computer screen, maybe.



bizarre
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,981
Location: In ur threadz postin cats

24 Jul 2007, 8:35 am

ShadesOfMe wrote:
calandale wrote:
MrMark wrote:
I suppose some of you prefer the so-called “do-nothing-mods” that others have complained so vocally about.


Interesting. I don't remember many complaints being
addressed about us doing too little, and when they did,
we always had to note that those were Alex's instructions
to us. Perhaps we need an UNDERMODERATION thread
as well?


That sounds odd. because this play was always a pretty nice place, never really needed much moderation, never really felt I had to complain to anyone, then there started being oer moderation, people started retaliating, and it spun out of control.


I agree with ShadesofMe we didn't have these problems when members moderated themselves. We only need moderators to clean-up major spam attacks and leave it to Alex to decide who should or should not be banned.


_________________
It are a fact
I know because of my learnings.


alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,224
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

24 Jul 2007, 8:42 am

MrMark wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
MrMark, who was this member banned for speaking out against you by Alex?


It was andy1976uk. I looked for the thread, but apparently Alex removed it. It was one of those things along the lines of "Who thinks so-n-so should be banned?" He basically imploded. "Dyonisian dis-memberment," Starr called it.



andy1976uk got banned for going insane and spamming the forums with heaps of threads talking about how he hated people with asperger's. He kept posting a ton of threads which were pure spam.

i then gave him a second chance after he cooled down. Initially he started to behave, but then after less than a day of being unbanned and promising to keep cool, he did the exact same thing. He started spamming threads in a manner similar to atomika, but he said worse things than "SPAM SPAM SPAM"


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social