Norah_W wrote:
UncleBeer wrote:
maritimeblaze17 wrote:
Here in the US you can be fired at any time for any reason.
Not entirely true. Folks in academia often enjoy tenure, and can only be fired after a lengthy and thorough peer review.
What kind of peer review? Wouldn't that mean Aspies would lose out again because their peers didn't like them, and could imply they weren't doing their job? I would hate to ever have to be evaluated by peers!
Take for example the case of
Ward Churchill. He's the guy that said that everyone that died at the World Trade Center deserved it because they were "little Eichmann's" (a Nazi war criminal), because they supposedly were part of the whole American military-industrial complex (when in fact they were just office workers...).
Ward was a professor of ethnic studies at the University of Colorado at Boulder. He'd gotten the job partly because he'd advertised himself as being of American Indian ancestry, although later it appeared he had no Indian ancestry whatsoever. A substantial percentage of his body of 'scholarly work' also appeared to be pure plagiarism. The University began a peer review of his work that lasted almost two years, ultimately leading to his firing. No small thing.
My point: despite the fact he'd made himself
hugely unpopular with his 9/11 comments, and despite the fact his academic misdeeds were pretty much open-&-shut, he still got the exhaustive peer review the system requires.