Quote:
the logical thinking [associated with AS] can be a huge asset in jury duty.
indeed, but on the other hand it makes me worry about what other idiots out there, who cannot think logically at all, do form part of a jury.
I don't know how the selection process works in the USA, but I would hope there is some screening for perceived intelligence of the individuals.
Otherwise you would have a case involving a really intelligent defendent with lots of University degrees, PHDs etc, who comes up with a cunning plan to save tax money from his very complex financial investments; and then who decides whether it's legitimate, or whether it's illegal tax evasion? It could be decided by "that idiot who works in McDonald's" [insert your own joke/layabout reference here]. That would be a scary legal system indeed.