No one's talking about Pokemon X & Y?

Page 3 of 5 [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

OMGitsKenny
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,076
Location: Westminster, SC

11 Jan 2013, 7:02 pm

Heh, do it and record it.


_________________
Okay people, bring me a spatula, some tanks, and an anenome! Sh*t's gettin' real tonight!
SKYPE meh!: thegreengiddly


Arkio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 653

11 Jan 2013, 7:47 pm

Yesssss! I shall indeed!



Kinme
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,002
Location: Spaghetti

12 Jan 2013, 6:48 am

I'm tempted, but I'd rather get Animal Crossing. I've barely started Black. I need to beat that first.



Thatmew
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,959

12 Jan 2013, 9:33 pm

I'm skeptical at best having called it quits after HeartGold and Soulsiver, and not even having touched Gen V. I await to see, with eyebrow raised, to see if the 3D is the only change they've made.


_________________
Yes? What is it? Ok. Now that is good.


Yayoi
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2013
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 236
Location: Australia

03 Feb 2013, 2:27 am

I'm actually REALLY excited for this, since I haven't got a 3DS yet and am asking for one for my birthday. The only one of the 3 starters I like is the fire one, but that's okay since it's based off a fox and any dog-related Pokemon is OK in my book! ;) The other two just aren't my thing... but they could grow on me, since I didn't really like any of the 5th generation starters until I actually chose the Tepig and he became my best fighter in the end.


_________________
Make cupcakes, not war.


eelektrik
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 579
Location: Irvine, CA

03 Feb 2013, 4:16 am

I haven't played a pokemon game since Red/Blue, but this looks pretty good so I think I'll get it when it comes out.



Lenoh
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2013
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 35
Location: Modesto, CA

03 Feb 2013, 6:05 am

Arkio wrote:
Image


AKA: When Nuzlockes get boring...



seaturtleisland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,243

03 Feb 2013, 3:35 pm

eelektrik wrote:
I haven't played a pokemon game since Red/Blue, but this looks pretty good so I think I'll get it when it comes out.


You might find that Pokemon is too flashy now. I'm not sure if that's your thing or if it bothers you.

I personally don't mind the flashiness but I would prefer it if it were gone. It seems unnecessary to me but I put up with it because I still enjoy the game.



seaturtleisland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,243

03 Feb 2013, 3:39 pm

I'd be more excited about if they made a version for the Nintendo DS.

I don't have a 3DS to play it on. I seem to find anything that's 3D repulsive. It just seems too gimmicky to me and that makes me not want to buy it.



Arkio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 653

03 Feb 2013, 7:09 pm

...What are Nuzlockes?



eelektrik
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 579
Location: Irvine, CA

03 Feb 2013, 7:39 pm

seaturtleisland wrote:
I'd be more excited about if they made a version for the Nintendo DS.

I don't have a 3DS to play it on. I seem to find anything that's 3D repulsive. It just seems too gimmicky to me and that makes me not want to buy it.


You do realize the 3D can be turned off right? Plus it depends on the game, the 3D on Super Mario 3D Land is pretty cool and works well with the style of game. Pokemon, it would be pretty unnecessary.



seaturtleisland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,243

03 Feb 2013, 9:46 pm

eelektrik wrote:
seaturtleisland wrote:
I'd be more excited about if they made a version for the Nintendo DS.

I don't have a 3DS to play it on. I seem to find anything that's 3D repulsive. It just seems too gimmicky to me and that makes me not want to buy it.


You do realize the 3D can be turned off right? Plus it depends on the game, the 3D on Super Mario 3D Land is pretty cool and works well with the style of game. Pokemon, it would be pretty unnecessary.


I know, it's more psychological. It doesn't bother me to watch 3D movies. What bothers me is how much 3D is pushed and pushed. Stop trying to sell me 3D. I really don't care.

I guess I'm refusing to buy anything 3D to make a point. I know it's stupid and irrational. I used to be an oversimplified advertisement hater in late elementary school and grade 9. I've realized how silly that is and this still feels stupid but it's an illogical reaction I'm having.

My 3D boycott is stupid but I feel uncomfortable abandoning it and actually buying anything 3D.



Rorberyllium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 546
Location: Maryland, United States

04 Feb 2013, 6:51 am

Arkio wrote:
...What are Nuzlockes?


The way Pokemon is meant to be played.

http://www.nuzlocke.com/challenge.php



xerofyre
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 39
Location: Australia

04 Feb 2013, 1:45 pm

Pokemon has evolved over time, Generation 1 & 2 were completely different from what Pokemon is now in Generation 5 & 6. I remember getting my first Pokemon game when I was 11 years old, it was Pokemon Yellow and I loved it. Then Gold & Silver came out and one of my friends had it, he let me try it and I saw how much the game had changed just from the first to the second generation.

Now compare that to what Pokemon is like today, held items, berries, natures, abilities, double and triple battles. The game has changed so much since then.

I was there when they announced Generation 6, and to be quite honest, I thought it looked amazing, but I don't think It's my kind of game. I prefered the earlier generations (1, 2 & 3), though I do still collect games, I have Red & Blue all the way up to Black & White, but I mostly play Generations 1, 2 & 3.



seaturtleisland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,243

04 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm

xerofyre wrote:
Pokemon has evolved over time, Generation 1 & 2 were completely different from what Pokemon is now in Generation 5 & 6. I remember getting my first Pokemon game when I was 11 years old, it was Pokemon Yellow and I loved it. Then Gold & Silver came out and one of my friends had it, he let me try it and I saw how much the game had changed just from the first to the second generation.

Now compare that to what Pokemon is like today, held items, berries, natures, abilities, double and triple battles. The game has changed so much since then.

I was there when they announced Generation 6, and to be quite honest, I thought it looked amazing, but I don't think It's my kind of game. I prefered the earlier generations (1, 2 & 3), though I do still collect games, I have Red & Blue all the way up to Black & White, but I mostly play Generations 1, 2 & 3.


The first game I played was generation 2 but I rented Pokemon Yellow later. I didn't actually own a game prior to gen 2. I didn't really get into it at first and I missed gen 3. I later played it on an emulator though. After that I got into it again towards the end of gen 4 and I've been into it since then but I don't see much being added besides a few gimmicks lately. The dreamworld was introduced and that gave pokemon access to new abilities but it didn't feel like much of an improvement to me.

In gen 2 there wasn't as much emphasis on story but that's what I was used to. I did find it nice when I played Emerald on an emulator and it was a little bit more colourful. I don't mean that in terms of graphics. Team magma and aqua were more interesting than team rocket. The submarine gets stolen, there's an underwater search you have to conduct, and in general more seems to happen in that game.

I also liked gen 4 because it just seemed more interesting in terms of the themes, emphasis on myth, and plot.

I realize the games became more like epics and that's different. I don't think it's necessarily better. I don't think it's worse either it's just different and it was a nice change.


Gen 5 was the biggest disappointment for me. Team plasma was boring. Other than the gameplay which is always similar the storyline just seemed so bland.

I liked gold because of the game's world map. The environment just seemed more open to me. Maybe it was because there were caves you didn't have to explore and parts of slowpoke well that you could go to optionally. You never had to go into the whirlpool islands. You never had to go into the tower (I forget what it was called). The unown ruins were optional. There was so much extra stuff to do in the game and there were places where you could just take a look around. There are still places like that in gen 5 but it seems like there are fewer.


The multiplayer is the one thing that maintains its value no matter what but I usually want a good game to go with it. I don't want to just buy the game to maintain access to a wide range of pokemon strictly for multiplayer. The game has to have something in it and to me gen 5 had absolutely nothing.



Rorberyllium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 546
Location: Maryland, United States

04 Feb 2013, 4:13 pm

Gen 2 was indeed the best. Having been there when Gold and Silver first came out, after spending hundreds of hours with Blue version and Yellow, it's the only Gen that felt like a proper sequel.

I'm currently doing an Emerald Nuzlocke run, my partner is playing as well. We added a couple additional rules and a couple mercy rules. So far my run is going obscenely well, at the 4th gym and without a single death. Got a Shiny Marill. It's probably the most fun I've had with a pokemon game in a long time.