Page 8 of 34 [ 530 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 34  Next

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

20 Jan 2014, 6:49 pm

Ann2011 wrote:
Logic over facts . . . if a weapon is present, it is more likely that a weapon will discharge.


So you don't drive or ride in automobiles?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

20 Jan 2014, 6:49 pm

I'm not sure if I'll word this right,but isn't there one hand gun that if you are ballsy enough you can disable by pushing the barrel in?Someone showed me this and I can't remember which one it is.Not that it really matters,I'm just wondering.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Sherlock03
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Oct 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 594
Location: Virginia

20 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm

Misslizard wrote:
I'm not sure if I'll word this right,but isn't there one hand gun that if you are ballsy enough you can disable by pushing the barrel in?Someone showed me this and I can't remember which one it is.Not that it really matters,I'm just wondering.
Yes, it is possible on some semi autos such as a Glock. If the gun is even slightly out of battery the gun will not fire.


_________________
"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." - Marcus Aurelius


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

20 Jan 2014, 7:07 pm

^^Thanks.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


sliqua-jcooter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,488
Location: Burke, Virginia, USA

20 Jan 2014, 7:30 pm

Sherlock03 wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
I'm not sure if I'll word this right,but isn't there one hand gun that if you are ballsy enough you can disable by pushing the barrel in?Someone showed me this and I can't remember which one it is.Not that it really matters,I'm just wondering.
Yes, it is possible on some semi autos such as a Glock. If the gun is even slightly out of battery the gun will not fire.


I feel the need to add the obvious "that's a really horrible idea and you should never, ever try it" disclaimer.


_________________
Nothing posted here should be construed as the opinion or position of my company, or an official position of WrongPlanet in any way, unless specifically mentioned.


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

20 Jan 2014, 7:42 pm

I don't plan on it :D I guess of you had to save a bus of toddlers from a shooter maybe someone would try,I doubt I'd be quick enough ,brave or foolish enough,or fast enough.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Ann2011
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,843
Location: Ontario, Canada

20 Jan 2014, 7:45 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
Logic over facts . . . if a weapon is present, it is more likely that a weapon will discharge.


So you don't drive or ride in automobiles?

I have to drive a car for my job. And honestly I think it's only a matter of time before I get in an accident. I'm on the road way too much.


_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger


sliqua-jcooter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,488
Location: Burke, Virginia, USA

20 Jan 2014, 7:49 pm

Misslizard wrote:
I don't plan on it :D I guess of you had to save a bus of toddlers from a shooter maybe someone would try,I doubt I'd be quick enough ,brave or foolish enough,or fast enough.


If you're close enough to get your hands on the gun, there are much better options that you can employ.


_________________
Nothing posted here should be construed as the opinion or position of my company, or an official position of WrongPlanet in any way, unless specifically mentioned.


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

20 Jan 2014, 7:50 pm

I’m just gonna nibble on a few of these.

LKL wrote:
Ok. The reason that prohbition and the 'war on drugs' were, and have been, such catastrophic failures, though, is that the banned substances in question are addictive and provide temporary psychological relief for living in miserable, hopeless conditions. The same cannot be said of guns.

1. Not everyone that is or was a doper lived in miserable conditions before they started. Some still don’t live in miserable conditions.
2. Guns appeal to a much wider spectrum of the population. Just because you’re a’feard of them doesn’t mean everyone else is. You actually know more gun owners than you think because not all of them advertise it. I know I don’t.

LKL wrote:
military type weapons, with huge clips, are significant overkill compared to what a citizen needs for 'self-defense,' unless he's a drug runner in LA.

What is a “huge clip”? For that matter what is a "clip"?
Who is to say what I or any other citizen need for self-defense or just plain shooting?
And you end it by saying that an LA drug runner does need one. :roll:

LKL wrote:
My stepmom carries a pistol when she goes horseback riding out in the hills: partly so that she can shoot a horse if she has to (most likely), partly so that she can shoot a mountain lion if she has to (a little likely), and partly so that she can shoot a person if she has to (not very likely, but nice to be prepared). She doesn't go out armed against the need to defend herself against a troop of Taliban militiamen.

So, in your mind, a pistol with a 7 or 8 round mag or a revolver is okey-dokey but one with a hi-cap mag 10+ is only for fighting off the Taliban?

LKL wrote:
Do you agree that Iowa allowing blind people to carry is a little bit ridiculous?
What about senile old people? My great uncle is getting a little bit paranoid in his dotage; afaIk he doesn't have a CCW permit, but I can totally see him shooting the mailman from his front porch someday. Not saying he should have his guns taken - he's had to shoot mountain lions after his sheep (in his front yard) before - but it does present a blurry line of what is 'reasonable.'

In those relatively isolated cases I’ll leave it up to the individual to govern themselves accordingly. If they don’t then that’s a risk I’m willing to live with. What about these senile old biddies that are out on the highways killing people? I’ve had more close calls with them than I have with the wrong people having a gun.


Sherlock03 wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
I'm not sure if I'll word this right,but isn't there one hand gun that if you are ballsy enough you can disable by pushing the barrel in?Someone showed me this and I can't remember which one it is.Not that it really matters,I'm just wondering.
Yes, it is possible on some semi autos such as a Glock. If the gun is even slightly out of battery the gun will not fire.


And all the shooter has to do is pull the pistol back toward them a fraction of an inch and it's back in battery: BANG! It's more of a Hollywood stunt than anything. Theoretically, a Beretta 92 (M9) can be disabled by grabbing it around the slide and frame, pushing in on the take-down lever release on one side of the frame and pushing down the take-down lever on the other side then sliding the whole slide/barrel assembly forward off of the frame therefor disabling the weapon. I have enough experience with the Beretta and while this is the take-down drill, I defy anyone to try it while someone is doing their damnedest to kill them with said pistol.

Sherlock03 wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
I would rather be next to someone smoking a cigarette than someone carrying a gun.
Well, there is some truth to this. For example, the type 94 Nambu ( Japanese WW2 service pistol) had a nasty habit of going off if you squeezed the frame too hard. However, most handguns are very reliable and may not even have a round chambered. A healthy fear of a gun isn't necessarily a bad thing, since it is conducive to safety. Obviously where you sit would be your choice, however, I think I would choose smokeless powder to smoker any day of the week.

Nambu's, especially 94's, are so rare that any safety issues with them are, for all practical purposes, a non-problem.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Last edited by Raptor on 20 Jan 2014, 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

20 Jan 2014, 7:51 pm

Misslizard wrote:
I'm not sure if I'll word this right,but isn't there one hand gun that if you are ballsy enough you can disable by pushing the barrel in?Someone showed me this and I can't remember which one it is.Not that it really matters,I'm just wondering.


Any automatic using a tilting barrel design can be jammed this way, which is why you never stick one into someone's back like they show in the movies; they even make a little 'L' shaped device that attaches to the frame of the gun to prevent this from happening in a struggle. Getting a hand over the top of the gun is a better overall strategy though, depending upon the model you can jam the trigger, block the hammer, pull the slide out of battery, or prevent the cylinder from turning if it's a revolver, or just rip the thing out of the guy's hand using the barrel for leverage if you know what you're doing. Just don't try the Jackie Chan move of hitting the takedown lever and stripping the top half of the gun off, much better to break the guy's trigger finger with the disarm before you turn his own gun on him.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

20 Jan 2014, 7:54 pm

Ann2011 wrote:
I have to drive a car for my job. And honestly I think it's only a matter of time before I get in an accident. I'm on the road way too much.


Do you see the problem with your argument now, or are you going to make me spell it out for you?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Sherlock03
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Oct 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 594
Location: Virginia

20 Jan 2014, 7:58 pm

Ann2011 wrote:
I have to drive a car for my job. And honestly I think it's only a matter of time before I get in an accident. I'm on the road way too much.


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSRm_X3BLPU[/youtube]


_________________
"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." - Marcus Aurelius


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

20 Jan 2014, 8:00 pm

Ann2011 wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
I don't notice you presenting a lot of evidence, just a lot of bluster.
I'm not the one making a claim that I need to support with evidence, evidence that in your case does not exist outside of your own personal bias. Make an evidence based claim, and I'll provide my own to dispute it with, otherwise I'm just wasting my time on someone who goes with feelings over facts.


Logic over facts . . . if a weapon is present, it is more likely that a weapon will discharge.


And again, how much experience do YOU have with firearms to assume they are going to just going to discharge?

I keep a few cigarette lighters in one of my kitchen drawers. Are they going to start fires by themselves??


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

20 Jan 2014, 8:08 pm

It was just on the news that e-cigarettes can catch on fire like a flare!Thats more dangerous than a holstered gun with the safety on.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

20 Jan 2014, 8:22 pm

/\ /\
I'd want to see more evidence than just some news story. I suspect that the control freaks and health nazis are actively trying to get an angle on banning e-cigarettes because it is still smoking in their opinion, even though it's not. Sometimes I buy a pack of Marlboro's and smoke a few in public just because.....


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Sherlock03
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Oct 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 594
Location: Virginia

20 Jan 2014, 8:28 pm

Raptor wrote:

And all the shooter has to do is pull the pistol back toward them a fraction of an inch and it's back in battery: BANG! It's more of a Hollywood stunt than anything.


I read an article about this topic a while ago. Although they said it is possible with a pistol, it should never be attempted with a rifle because the shooter has more leverage and can either step back (putting you back in the line of fire), or smack you with the but of the rifle. If all else fails chew the ba$tards eyes out ,and die in a way that will make the papers


_________________
"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." - Marcus Aurelius