I’m just gonna nibble on a few of these.
LKL wrote:
Ok. The reason that prohbition and the 'war on drugs' were, and have been, such catastrophic failures, though, is that the banned substances in question are addictive and provide temporary psychological relief for living in miserable, hopeless conditions. The same cannot be said of guns.
1. Not everyone that is or was a doper lived in miserable conditions before they started. Some still don’t live in miserable conditions.
2. Guns appeal to a much wider spectrum of the population. Just because you’re a’feard of them doesn’t mean everyone else is. You actually know more gun owners than you think because not all of them advertise it. I know I don’t.
LKL wrote:
military type weapons, with huge clips, are significant overkill compared to what a citizen needs for 'self-defense,' unless he's a drug runner in LA.
What is a “huge clip”? For that matter what is a "clip"?
Who is to say what I or any other citizen
need for self-defense or just plain shooting?
And you end it by saying that an LA drug runner does
need one.
LKL wrote:
My stepmom carries a pistol when she goes horseback riding out in the hills: partly so that she can shoot a horse if she has to (most likely), partly so that she can shoot a mountain lion if she has to (a little likely), and partly so that she can shoot a person if she has to (not very likely, but nice to be prepared). She doesn't go out armed against the need to defend herself against a troop of Taliban militiamen.
So, in your mind, a pistol with a 7 or 8 round mag or a revolver is okey-dokey but one with a hi-cap mag 10+ is only for fighting off the Taliban?
LKL wrote:
Do you agree that Iowa allowing blind people to carry is a little bit ridiculous?
What about senile old people? My great uncle is getting a little bit paranoid in his dotage; afaIk he doesn't have a CCW permit, but I can totally see him shooting the mailman from his front porch someday. Not saying he should have his guns taken - he's had to shoot mountain lions after his sheep (in his front yard) before - but it does present a blurry line of what is 'reasonable.'
In those relatively isolated cases I’ll leave it up to the individual to govern themselves accordingly. If they don’t then that’s a risk I’m willing to live with. What about these senile old biddies that are out on the highways killing people? I’ve had more close calls with them than I have with the wrong people having a gun.
Sherlock03 wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
I'm not sure if I'll word this right,but isn't there one hand gun that if you are ballsy enough you can disable by pushing the barrel in?Someone showed me this and I can't remember which one it is.Not that it really matters,I'm just wondering.
Yes, it is possible on some semi autos such as a Glock. If the gun is even slightly out of battery the gun will not fire.
And all the shooter has to do is pull the pistol back toward them a fraction of an inch and it's back in battery:
BANG! It's more of a Hollywood stunt than anything. Theoretically, a Beretta 92 (M9) can be disabled by grabbing it around the slide and frame, pushing in on the take-down lever release on one side of the frame and pushing down the take-down lever on the other side then sliding the whole slide/barrel assembly forward off of the frame therefor disabling the weapon. I have enough experience with the Beretta and while this is the take-down drill, I defy anyone to try it while someone is doing their damnedest to kill them with said pistol.
Sherlock03 wrote:
Ann2011 wrote:
I would rather be next to someone smoking a cigarette than someone carrying a gun.
Well, there is some truth to this. For example, the type 94 Nambu ( Japanese WW2 service pistol) had a nasty habit of going off if you squeezed the frame too hard. However, most handguns are very reliable and may not even have a round chambered. A healthy fear of a gun isn't necessarily a bad thing, since it is conducive to safety. Obviously where you sit would be your choice, however, I think I would choose smokeless powder to smoker any day of the week.
Nambu's, especially 94's, are so rare that any safety issues with them are, for all practical purposes, a non-problem.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
Last edited by Raptor on 20 Jan 2014, 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.