21 Mar 2016, 6:36 pm
AR15000 wrote:
CommanderKeen wrote:
Outrider wrote:
What about her age now??? 
A 17 year old Feminist isn't so far-fetched, in fact, this millenial generation about my age are absolutely full of little third-wave feminists.
And their boyfriends? Somewhat submissive males who are also 'feminists' and coincidentally almost always skinny guys, slightly effeminate, extremely nerdy/geeky.
Every girl I've dated has constantly been infected with this trend.
I believe, when it comes to dating, for the first three dates, whoever does the asking should do the paying, out of politeness and courtesy, and then after that it should be split.
Instead, every gal I've dated has absolute insisted on always paying for everything for herself - even my ex-girlfriend's mother suggested I should be the one who pays for our third date 'to treat her' as her family payed for me when I first met them, but that never happened.
I'm too traditional and chivalrous sometimes for these neo-feminists.
A 17 year old Feminist isn't so far-fetched, in fact, this millenial generation about my age are absolutely full of little third-wave feminists.
And their boyfriends? Somewhat submissive males who are also 'feminists' and coincidentally almost always skinny guys, slightly effeminate, extremely nerdy/geeky.
Every girl I've dated has constantly been infected with this trend.
I believe, when it comes to dating, for the first three dates, whoever does the asking should do the paying, out of politeness and courtesy, and then after that it should be split.
Instead, every gal I've dated has absolute insisted on always paying for everything for herself - even my ex-girlfriend's mother suggested I should be the one who pays for our third date 'to treat her' as her family payed for me when I first met them, but that never happened.
I'm too traditional and chivalrous sometimes for these neo-feminists.
And those same girls cheat on those guys with muscular men, yet they would never date muscular men. Men with muscles equates to higher testosterone. Men with higher testosterone aren't as easily manipulated.
They only cheat with muscular men so long as those musclemen are tall. I've observed that height is often more attractive to women than big muscles. A lot of musclemen aren't born with that build, they develop it through discipline. But in particular, it is muscular men who are also ATHLETIC that women cheat on their partners with! I mean srsly, those powerlifters whose pictures you posted a while back are gross, ugly_ass lards. There is a difference between being muscular and being a roided out bodybuilder!
Keep in mind that musculature and height are not the only things that turn women on....musical talent works just as well if not moreso along with being very extroverted and charismatic.
I don't remember who I posted, aside from Van Damme. If that's the case, that's absurd. I don't recall ever posting pictures of actually powerlifters. Also, are you a man, or are you a woman?
21 Mar 2016, 6:38 pm
21 Mar 2016, 6:49 pm
LydiaMarie wrote:
CommanderKeen wrote:
Outrider wrote:
What about her age now???
A 17 year old Feminist isn't so far-fetched, in fact, this millenial generation about my age are absolutely full of little third-wave feminists.
And their boyfriends? Somewhat submissive males who are also 'feminists' and coincidentally almost always skinny guys, slightly effeminate, extremely nerdy/geeky.
Every girl I've dated has constantly been infected with this trend.
I believe, when it comes to dating, for the first three dates, whoever does the asking should do the paying, out of politeness and courtesy, and then after that it should be split.
Instead, every gal I've dated has absolute insisted on always paying for everything for herself - even my ex-girlfriend's mother suggested I should be the one who pays for our third date 'to treat her' as her family payed for me when I first met them, but that never happened.
I'm too traditional and chivalrous sometimes for these neo-feminists.
A 17 year old Feminist isn't so far-fetched, in fact, this millenial generation about my age are absolutely full of little third-wave feminists.
And their boyfriends? Somewhat submissive males who are also 'feminists' and coincidentally almost always skinny guys, slightly effeminate, extremely nerdy/geeky.
Every girl I've dated has constantly been infected with this trend.
I believe, when it comes to dating, for the first three dates, whoever does the asking should do the paying, out of politeness and courtesy, and then after that it should be split.
Instead, every gal I've dated has absolute insisted on always paying for everything for herself - even my ex-girlfriend's mother suggested I should be the one who pays for our third date 'to treat her' as her family payed for me when I first met them, but that never happened.
I'm too traditional and chivalrous sometimes for these neo-feminists.
And those same girls cheat on those guys with muscular men, yet they would never date muscular men. Men with muscles equates to higher testosterone. Men with higher testosterone aren't as easily manipulated.
Well, you've certainly got the nerdy/geeky part right, Outrider.
CommanderKeen, I'm not opposed to the idea of dating muscular men. My boyfriend is pretty fit, and I've had crushes on several distinctly muscular guys at various times.
I would never cheat on my boyfriend. Not sure why you assume that I would...?
I don't really I understand why you imply that I am somehow manipulating him. "Manipulation" is defined as " to manage or utilize skillfully" or "to control or play upon by artful, unfair, or insidious means especially to one's own advantage" (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manipulate). I am not doing any of these things.
Yeah, I don't agree with CommanderKeen's impression of feminists. I'm a feminist, and the longest relationship I've ever had (2 years) was with the biggest, most muscular guy of all my (few, unfortunately) boyfriends. Weirdly (according to CK), neither of us manipulated each other--the relationship ultimately didn't work because we were too incompatible in personality (he was extremely NT, all about appearances, very superficial, and money-grubbing--I saw more depth in him when I started dating him than was actually there, and it took me an embarrassingly long time to realise it). But I guess that just means I'm an exception to the rule, and most feminists want men they can push around and so wouldn't want to have an LTR with a big muscly guy.
21 Mar 2016, 7:08 pm
Aesthetic
Not Aesthetic
Weak guy that "feminists" would say has just enough muscles
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,669
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
21 Mar 2016, 7:11 pm
21 Mar 2016, 7:54 pm
CommanderKeen wrote:
AR15000 wrote:
CommanderKeen wrote:
Outrider wrote:
What about her age now???
A 17 year old Feminist isn't so far-fetched, in fact, this millenial generation about my age are absolutely full of little third-wave feminists.
And their boyfriends? Somewhat submissive males who are also 'feminists' and coincidentally almost always skinny guys, slightly effeminate, extremely nerdy/geeky.
Every girl I've dated has constantly been infected with this trend.
I believe, when it comes to dating, for the first three dates, whoever does the asking should do the paying, out of politeness and courtesy, and then after that it should be split.
Instead, every gal I've dated has absolute insisted on always paying for everything for herself - even my ex-girlfriend's mother suggested I should be the one who pays for our third date 'to treat her' as her family payed for me when I first met them, but that never happened.
I'm too traditional and chivalrous sometimes for these neo-feminists.
A 17 year old Feminist isn't so far-fetched, in fact, this millenial generation about my age are absolutely full of little third-wave feminists.
And their boyfriends? Somewhat submissive males who are also 'feminists' and coincidentally almost always skinny guys, slightly effeminate, extremely nerdy/geeky.
Every girl I've dated has constantly been infected with this trend.
I believe, when it comes to dating, for the first three dates, whoever does the asking should do the paying, out of politeness and courtesy, and then after that it should be split.
Instead, every gal I've dated has absolute insisted on always paying for everything for herself - even my ex-girlfriend's mother suggested I should be the one who pays for our third date 'to treat her' as her family payed for me when I first met them, but that never happened.
I'm too traditional and chivalrous sometimes for these neo-feminists.
And those same girls cheat on those guys with muscular men, yet they would never date muscular men. Men with muscles equates to higher testosterone. Men with higher testosterone aren't as easily manipulated.
They only cheat with muscular men so long as those musclemen are tall. I've observed that height is often more attractive to women than big muscles. A lot of musclemen aren't born with that build, they develop it through discipline. But in particular, it is muscular men who are also ATHLETIC that women cheat on their partners with! I mean srsly, those powerlifters whose pictures you posted a while back are gross, ugly_ass lards. There is a difference between being muscular and being a roided out bodybuilder!
Keep in mind that musculature and height are not the only things that turn women on....musical talent works just as well if not moreso along with being very extroverted and charismatic.
I don't remember who I posted, aside from Van Damme. If that's the case, that's absurd. I don't recall ever posting pictures of actually powerlifters. Also, are you a man, or are you a woman?
I'm a MAN. How about you?
21 Mar 2016, 8:11 pm
22 Mar 2016, 12:17 am
arabian1
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 8 Mar 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 66
Location: california
22 Mar 2016, 12:58 am
22 Mar 2016, 1:08 am
CommanderKeen wrote:
Wow, lol. I was curious, I wasn't poking fun.
It's all good. I wasn't sure if you were poking fun or actually asking. I guess I thought it was obvious that I'm male(profile *should* say so).
I voted the last option just to be ironic though!
22 Mar 2016, 2:13 am
AspE wrote:
Nocturnus wrote:
...No, good sir, that makes you a libertarian and a Marxist.
No, just a feminist. And your superficial expression of politeness doesn't make that statement any less stupid.
Superficial? I see you are well versed in the art of courtesy, a refined charmer as such as yourself must be invited to all of the high brow parties.
22 Mar 2016, 10:50 am
Nocturnus wrote:
...Superficial? I see you are well versed in the art of courtesy, a refined charmer as such as yourself must be invited to all of the high brow parties.
Yeah, those people love it when you talk like a Victorian jackass.
22 Mar 2016, 1:40 pm
I'd date a feminist if she was attractive, funny, interesting, and had the guts to say to me:
Quote:
I am a woman, you are man, and you must submit!
...without losing her composure and with a wicked sense of humor!
22 Mar 2016, 3:01 pm
AspE wrote:
Nocturnus wrote:
...Superficial? I see you are well versed in the art of courtesy, a refined charmer as such as yourself must be invited to all of the high brow parties.
Yeah, those people love it when you talk like a Victorian jackass.
You are speaking our language, aren't you?
22 Mar 2016, 3:03 pm
22 Mar 2016, 4:17 pm
Nocturnus wrote:
AspE wrote:
Nocturnus wrote:
...Superficial? I see you are well versed in the art of courtesy, a refined charmer as such as yourself must be invited to all of the high brow parties.
Yeah, those people love it when you talk like a Victorian jackass.
You are speaking our language, aren't you?
Never.
