Page 8 of 19 [ 290 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 19  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

02 Feb 2017, 6:42 am

Shahunshah wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
lidsmichelle wrote:
Barchan wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
Adamantium wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
The term Aryan also means "from Iran" for those who have that complex.


In recognition of this simple truth, can we take advantage of current law and deport people who self-identify this way until they have been subject to extreme vetting?

My satiredar went off. :D

Satire aside, there's a valid point to be seen here; why are Americans more afraid of radical Islam than they are of radical white racism?

Because muslim people are "other," especially those practicing a different religion, so it's easier for them to demonize them. They find it harder to demonize other white people. Especially when they're not harming other white people (or are harming "bad" white people like people who work at Planned Parenthood lmao).

White Christians cause the most harm in this country, on a terrorism level and a governmental level, but here we are claiming that people that are easier to other are the real culprits.

Edit: obviously white practitioners of Islam exist but the backlash is against the non white ones for the most part. Though I've seen some people lose their s**t and claim white practitioners are like race traitors or something. Cuz as we all know, Islam is a race lmao.


Its not just that, racism is in the decline. Even the most conservative states in the country like Louisiana and South Carolina have elected African Americans and Indian Americans to prominent positions. Since less people are practicing it their is not so much to fear from those people.

Islam is different. Their is a large radical minority that if we let in could be bad for society. Did you know a BBC poll in Britain found that nearly half the people think homosexuality should be illegal, many Muslims even in European countries believe in Sharia law. If we bring people into our country who have fundamentally different values, their is a chance they will lash out against society.


But Muslims in the UK are an isolated, ghettoized minority, who cling with dear life to their traditional culture. Here in America, Muslims are much more likely to be assimilated, thus more receptive to the values of liberal democracy.
Even the most secular, economically stable Muslim countries have some support for Sharia law in their own countries.


But that hardly means the tiny Muslim population in America would be capable of instituting Sharia law here, or that they all would even want to.
I am a Clinton supporter like you and I don't like Trump's Muslim ban, I don't only think it is bad for us fighting terrorism it is immoral.

But their is a significant and sizeable large minority Muslims that hold extreme beliefs. We must be aware of that.


Sure, we should be aware of extremist Muslims. But we should also be aware of Irish immigrants with ties to the IRA, or Spanish citizens tied to Basque separatist terrorists. And yes, those groups have killed large numbers of innocent people, as well.
Islam is more likely to be adverse to our values and culture.


I'm more likely to take people as individuals, rather than assuming they are going to act stereotypically for their ethno/religious group. Otherwise, all Germans would be regarded as Nazis, all Irish as violent drunks, all Jews as greedy con men, all blacks as lazy criminals, etc.
They are its what many of them believe in. You can say what you want about Muslims being individuals when they support Sharia law like many of them do they are taking a standpoint which is against Western values.


Then we'll have to agree to disagree.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


the_phoenix
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,489
Location: up from the ashes

02 Feb 2017, 10:24 am

Jacoby wrote:
Justifying this type of political violence anywhere justifies it everywhere, it's pretty ironic that these same people claim to be protesting in the name of freedom of speech are the ones physically attacking people because they don't like their opinions as detestable as they are.


Exactly.



Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1026
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

02 Feb 2017, 3:52 pm

And yet...


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

02 Feb 2017, 3:57 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

But Muslims in the UK are an isolated, ghettoized minority, who cling with dear life to their traditional culture. Here in America, Muslims are much more likely to be assimilated, thus more receptive to the values of liberal democracy.
Even the most secular, economically stable Muslim countries have some support for Sharia law in their own countries.


But that hardly means the tiny Muslim population in America would be capable of instituting Sharia law here, or that they all would even want to.


I imagine a lot of people who leave muslim countries to come to America or go to European countries are probably trying to get away from that not instate it in those places.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

02 Feb 2017, 4:05 pm

the_phoenix wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Justifying this type of political violence anywhere justifies it everywhere, it's pretty ironic that these same people claim to be protesting in the name of freedom of speech are the ones physically attacking people because they don't like their opinions as detestable as they are.


Exactly.


Well perhaps they shouldn't encourage political violence against groups of people out side white Christian conservatives. I don't condone going up and hitting some random neo-nazi, but if they're verbally and/or physically harassing you or others then yes I fully support whatever person punches them in the face.

That hardly justifies all violence resulting at all from politics. And out of curiosity you think it would be so wrong to punch an islamic extremist sympathizer if they were spewing a bunch of extremist bullcrap at you? Would the rights figurative heart be figuratively bleeding so much for that hypothetical extremist?


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


the_phoenix
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,489
Location: up from the ashes

02 Feb 2017, 4:34 pm

Adamantium wrote:
And yet...


“Eomer said, 'How is a man to judge what to do in such times?'
As he has ever judged,' said Aragorn. 'Good and evil have not changed since yesteryear, nor are they one thing among Elves and another among Men.”

― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Two Towers

... I stand by my previous post.



Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1026
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

02 Feb 2017, 4:40 pm

^It wasn't meant as a serious counterargument-as my previous posts hopefully made clear, I agree with you.

I was just seizing on the opportunity to introduce that bit from Woody Allen.


_________________
Don't believe the gender note under my avatar. A WP bug means I can't fix it.


the_phoenix
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,489
Location: up from the ashes

02 Feb 2017, 4:48 pm

Adamantium wrote:
^It wasn't meant as a serious counterargument-as my previous posts hopefully made clear, I agree with you.

I was just seizing on the opportunity to introduce that bit from Woody Allen.


Thank you for explaining.
I've rarely ventured into the more political parts of WP,
and am still getting used to it.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

02 Feb 2017, 5:38 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
But Muslims in the UK are an isolated, ghettoized minority, who cling with dear life to their traditional culture. Here in America, Muslims are much more likely to be assimilated, thus more receptive to the values of liberal democracy.


I'm sorry but you are talking out of your rear.

Muslims are not ghettoized, and there are much bigger minority than in the US due to historic connections. Please get your facts right.

Also you even got the culture and traditions bit wrong too. There are those elder who adhere to traditional culture, and younger that fit into modern society, then you have the youngster whoa re a little be confused and don't fit in either.

There areas where there is separation it is largely through choice much like areas of Detroit which are Somali. However like Detroit these area have had economic decline and are former industrial towns.

However the vast majority of Muslims are not isolated even if they choose to live in areas where their culture is more prevalent. This is no different and less distinct than a China town.

The people who are the most isolated are those that don't speak English like some Imams.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

02 Feb 2017, 5:45 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
But Muslims in the UK are an isolated, ghettoized minority, who cling with dear life to their traditional culture. Here in America, Muslims are much more likely to be assimilated, thus more receptive to the values of liberal democracy.


I'm sorry but you are talking out of your rear.

Muslims are not ghettoized, and there are much bigger minority than in the US due to historic connections. Please get your facts right.

Also you even got the culture and traditions bit wrong too. There are those elder who adhere to traditional culture, and younger that fit into modern society, then you have the youngster whoa re a little be confused and don't fit in either.

There areas where there is separation it is largely through choice much like areas of Detroit which are Somali. However like Detroit these area have had economic decline and are former industrial towns.

However the vast majority of Muslims are not isolated even if they choose to live in areas where their culture is more prevalent. This is no different and less distinct than a China town.

The people who are the most isolated are those that don't speak English like some Imams.


Well, forgive me for talking out of my butt. :oops: Perhaps I am thinking of France, or some other continental country where Muslims are shunned by the native society.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

02 Feb 2017, 5:50 pm

Islam is an ideology that is deserving of criticism, this is not the same as discriminating against Muslims.

However there is a point to be said about moral consistency.

There are two type of moderates:
1. those that don't practice but make excuse an appease intolerant and imoral ideas.
2. those that acknowledge the need for reform

Reformist are rare becuase of the instance of immutable word (if only they would actual bother to read it) and monolithic faith.

I have more respect for Ahmadiyya, but the rest not so much.

There is a lot of sectarianism. So a Shia like Barchan will blame it on the Sunnis as she has done before. There is point there but it is not lie the Shia don't have their own problems too.

Any rights only extend as far as they won't interfere with another's so nobody has protection against being offended.

I have less respect and sympathy for those that don't acknowledge problematic doctrine.



Shahunshah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,225
Location: NZ

02 Feb 2017, 6:06 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
Islam is an ideology that is deserving of criticism, this is not the same as discriminating against Muslims.

However there is a point to be said about moral consistency.

There are two type of moderates:
1. those that don't practice but make excuse an appease intolerant and imoral ideas.
2. those that acknowledge the need for reform

Reformist are rare becuase of the instance of immutable word (if only they would actual bother to read it) and monolithic faith.

I have more respect for Ahmadiyya, but the rest not so much.

There is a lot of sectarianism. So a Shia like Barchan will blame it on the Sunnis as she has done before. There is point there but it is not lie the Shia don't have their own problems too.

Any rights only extend as far as they won't interfere with another's so nobody has protection against being offended.

I have less respect and sympathy for those that don't acknowledge problematic doctrine.
Reformists are actually everywhere imaginable. Even in Iran the Green movement has at least 30% of the public's support and that has fought against Iran's oppressive policies and denial of the Holocaust. As much as their are extremists their are so many Muslims on our side and we need to help them. The way to do that as by not alienating them and forcing more Muslims to side with the extremists.



Onyxaxe
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 395

02 Feb 2017, 6:18 pm

I'm black so I'm glad he got punched. Nazis expect to be able to walk around proudly while wanting to exterminate an entire race that their ancestors brought over against their will. Add to that their supremacy is genetically unfounded as most Nazis have mixed lineage just like everyone else. Expecting us to be happy about being shot down in the streets while condemning all violence is asinine. This is a result of the surmounting turmoil of American racism and Xenophobia that everyone but minorities and their loved ones are afraid or unwilling to address. History repeats itself, if everyone wants to candy coat Nazis instead of tell them they don't belong we are going to have another Civil War.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

02 Feb 2017, 6:19 pm

Shahunshah wrote:
Reformists are actually everywhere imaginable. Even in Iran the Green movement has at least 30% of the public's support and that has fought against Iran's oppressive policies and denial of the Holocaust. As much as their are extremists their are so many Muslims on our side and we need to help them. The way to do that as by not alienating them and forcing more Muslims to side with the extremists.


I'm talking about theological reformist, such as a reform mosques. Ahmadiyya for instance. There are few of those that identify as such. There hasn't been an Islamic reformation like there was in Christianity and Judaism. Nobody is being forced to side with extremists. People choose that path becuase it appeals to them.

Also most of the tensions are internal. There has been infighting since the the battle of Battle of Karbala 680AD.

It is unwise to stir them up but they don't need much to set them off. Tensions have to exist to be stired up, it is about time they also owned the problem.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

02 Feb 2017, 6:23 pm

Aren't Muslims who are into Sufi mysticism of a reformist bent?



Shahunshah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,225
Location: NZ

02 Feb 2017, 6:28 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
Reformists are actually everywhere imaginable. Even in Iran the Green movement has at least 30% of the public's support and that has fought against Iran's oppressive policies and denial of the Holocaust. As much as their are extremists their are so many Muslims on our side and we need to help them. The way to do that as by not alienating them and forcing more Muslims to side with the extremists.


I'm talking about theological reformist, such as a reform mosques. Ahmadiyya for instance. There are few of those that identify as such. There hasn't been an Islamic reformation like there was in Christianity and Judaism. Nobody is being forced to side with extremists. People choose that path becuase it appeals to them.

Also most of the tensions are internal. There has been infighting since the the battle of Battle of Karbala 680AD.

It is unwise to stir them up but they don't need much to set them off. Tensions have to exist to be stired up, it is about time they also owned the problem.


I think if we want change in the Islamic world we should make our campaign more about individual issues rather than about the changing the Islamic faith. For example I think we should campaign for women's rights in states such as Saudi Arabia and Arabia but shouldn't criticize the Islamic faith when we do that since it just alienates people. Their are examples of this working for instance the Pakistani female Prime Minister was elected on the grounds of getting rid of laws that oppress women however if she had criticized the Islamic faith she wouldn't have been elected.

So you know what I think, I believe we should criticize governments of Saudi Arabia and Iran but we can't criticize Islam that will alienate people when we need their cooperation.