On punching Nazis
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
In recognition of this simple truth, can we take advantage of current law and deport people who self-identify this way until they have been subject to extreme vetting?
My satiredar went off.
Satire aside, there's a valid point to be seen here; why are Americans more afraid of radical Islam than they are of radical white racism?
Because muslim people are "other," especially those practicing a different religion, so it's easier for them to demonize them. They find it harder to demonize other white people. Especially when they're not harming other white people (or are harming "bad" white people like people who work at Planned Parenthood lmao).
White Christians cause the most harm in this country, on a terrorism level and a governmental level, but here we are claiming that people that are easier to other are the real culprits.
Edit: obviously white practitioners of Islam exist but the backlash is against the non white ones for the most part. Though I've seen some people lose their s**t and claim white practitioners are like race traitors or something. Cuz as we all know, Islam is a race lmao.
Its not just that, racism is in the decline. Even the most conservative states in the country like Louisiana and South Carolina have elected African Americans and Indian Americans to prominent positions. Since less people are practicing it their is not so much to fear from those people.
Islam is different. Their is a large radical minority that if we let in could be bad for society. Did you know a BBC poll in Britain found that nearly half the people think homosexuality should be illegal, many Muslims even in European countries believe in Sharia law. If we bring people into our country who have fundamentally different values, their is a chance they will lash out against society.
But Muslims in the UK are an isolated, ghettoized minority, who cling with dear life to their traditional culture. Here in America, Muslims are much more likely to be assimilated, thus more receptive to the values of liberal democracy.
But that hardly means the tiny Muslim population in America would be capable of instituting Sharia law here, or that they all would even want to.
But their is a significant and sizeable large minority Muslims that hold extreme beliefs. We must be aware of that.
Sure, we should be aware of extremist Muslims. But we should also be aware of Irish immigrants with ties to the IRA, or Spanish citizens tied to Basque separatist terrorists. And yes, those groups have killed large numbers of innocent people, as well.
I'm more likely to take people as individuals, rather than assuming they are going to act stereotypically for their ethno/religious group. Otherwise, all Germans would be regarded as Nazis, all Irish as violent drunks, all Jews as greedy con men, all blacks as lazy criminals, etc.
Then we'll have to agree to disagree.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Exactly.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
But Muslims in the UK are an isolated, ghettoized minority, who cling with dear life to their traditional culture. Here in America, Muslims are much more likely to be assimilated, thus more receptive to the values of liberal democracy.
But that hardly means the tiny Muslim population in America would be capable of instituting Sharia law here, or that they all would even want to.
I imagine a lot of people who leave muslim countries to come to America or go to European countries are probably trying to get away from that not instate it in those places.
_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Exactly.
Well perhaps they shouldn't encourage political violence against groups of people out side white Christian conservatives. I don't condone going up and hitting some random neo-nazi, but if they're verbally and/or physically harassing you or others then yes I fully support whatever person punches them in the face.
That hardly justifies all violence resulting at all from politics. And out of curiosity you think it would be so wrong to punch an islamic extremist sympathizer if they were spewing a bunch of extremist bullcrap at you? Would the rights figurative heart be figuratively bleeding so much for that hypothetical extremist?
_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.
“Eomer said, 'How is a man to judge what to do in such times?'
As he has ever judged,' said Aragorn. 'Good and evil have not changed since yesteryear, nor are they one thing among Elves and another among Men.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Two Towers
... I stand by my previous post.
I was just seizing on the opportunity to introduce that bit from Woody Allen.
Thank you for explaining.
I've rarely ventured into the more political parts of WP,
and am still getting used to it.
I'm sorry but you are talking out of your rear.
Muslims are not ghettoized, and there are much bigger minority than in the US due to historic connections. Please get your facts right.
Also you even got the culture and traditions bit wrong too. There are those elder who adhere to traditional culture, and younger that fit into modern society, then you have the youngster whoa re a little be confused and don't fit in either.
There areas where there is separation it is largely through choice much like areas of Detroit which are Somali. However like Detroit these area have had economic decline and are former industrial towns.
However the vast majority of Muslims are not isolated even if they choose to live in areas where their culture is more prevalent. This is no different and less distinct than a China town.
The people who are the most isolated are those that don't speak English like some Imams.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
I'm sorry but you are talking out of your rear.
Muslims are not ghettoized, and there are much bigger minority than in the US due to historic connections. Please get your facts right.
Also you even got the culture and traditions bit wrong too. There are those elder who adhere to traditional culture, and younger that fit into modern society, then you have the youngster whoa re a little be confused and don't fit in either.
There areas where there is separation it is largely through choice much like areas of Detroit which are Somali. However like Detroit these area have had economic decline and are former industrial towns.
However the vast majority of Muslims are not isolated even if they choose to live in areas where their culture is more prevalent. This is no different and less distinct than a China town.
The people who are the most isolated are those that don't speak English like some Imams.
Well, forgive me for talking out of my butt.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Islam is an ideology that is deserving of criticism, this is not the same as discriminating against Muslims.
However there is a point to be said about moral consistency.
There are two type of moderates:
1. those that don't practice but make excuse an appease intolerant and imoral ideas.
2. those that acknowledge the need for reform
Reformist are rare becuase of the instance of immutable word (if only they would actual bother to read it) and monolithic faith.
I have more respect for Ahmadiyya, but the rest not so much.
There is a lot of sectarianism. So a Shia like Barchan will blame it on the Sunnis as she has done before. There is point there but it is not lie the Shia don't have their own problems too.
Any rights only extend as far as they won't interfere with another's so nobody has protection against being offended.
I have less respect and sympathy for those that don't acknowledge problematic doctrine.
However there is a point to be said about moral consistency.
There are two type of moderates:
1. those that don't practice but make excuse an appease intolerant and imoral ideas.
2. those that acknowledge the need for reform
Reformist are rare becuase of the instance of immutable word (if only they would actual bother to read it) and monolithic faith.
I have more respect for Ahmadiyya, but the rest not so much.
There is a lot of sectarianism. So a Shia like Barchan will blame it on the Sunnis as she has done before. There is point there but it is not lie the Shia don't have their own problems too.
Any rights only extend as far as they won't interfere with another's so nobody has protection against being offended.
I have less respect and sympathy for those that don't acknowledge problematic doctrine.
I'm black so I'm glad he got punched. Nazis expect to be able to walk around proudly while wanting to exterminate an entire race that their ancestors brought over against their will. Add to that their supremacy is genetically unfounded as most Nazis have mixed lineage just like everyone else. Expecting us to be happy about being shot down in the streets while condemning all violence is asinine. This is a result of the surmounting turmoil of American racism and Xenophobia that everyone but minorities and their loved ones are afraid or unwilling to address. History repeats itself, if everyone wants to candy coat Nazis instead of tell them they don't belong we are going to have another Civil War.
I'm talking about theological reformist, such as a reform mosques. Ahmadiyya for instance. There are few of those that identify as such. There hasn't been an Islamic reformation like there was in Christianity and Judaism. Nobody is being forced to side with extremists. People choose that path becuase it appeals to them.
Also most of the tensions are internal. There has been infighting since the the battle of Battle of Karbala 680AD.
It is unwise to stir them up but they don't need much to set them off. Tensions have to exist to be stired up, it is about time they also owned the problem.
I'm talking about theological reformist, such as a reform mosques. Ahmadiyya for instance. There are few of those that identify as such. There hasn't been an Islamic reformation like there was in Christianity and Judaism. Nobody is being forced to side with extremists. People choose that path becuase it appeals to them.
Also most of the tensions are internal. There has been infighting since the the battle of Battle of Karbala 680AD.
It is unwise to stir them up but they don't need much to set them off. Tensions have to exist to be stired up, it is about time they also owned the problem.
I think if we want change in the Islamic world we should make our campaign more about individual issues rather than about the changing the Islamic faith. For example I think we should campaign for women's rights in states such as Saudi Arabia and Arabia but shouldn't criticize the Islamic faith when we do that since it just alienates people. Their are examples of this working for instance the Pakistani female Prime Minister was elected on the grounds of getting rid of laws that oppress women however if she had criticized the Islamic faith she wouldn't have been elected.
So you know what I think, I believe we should criticize governments of Saudi Arabia and Iran but we can't criticize Islam that will alienate people when we need their cooperation.
