Stop using guns to kill things!
Loughner's Glock jammed on it's extended clip too. My experience with extended magazines has been that they do require more discipline from the shooter to work correctly, allowing the gun to recoil too much ("limp wristing") can cause centripetal force to lift the bullets in the magazine in such a way as to cause a jam, especially in Glocks. Most drum magazines used on rifles have to be wound up like a clockwork toy, and there are many more things than can go wrong than with a simple spring-loaded magazine. There is a reason that you might see extended magazines at the range and in the movies but not so much among the military and police, they just train to change magazines relatively quickly.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
Or they can be taped together side by side like this:
I think a determined and experienced shooter will be able to fire the amount he wants quickly and accurately regardless of magazine size
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
I read he also had extended magazines for his pistol. And we don't yet know how many rounds were left in the AR-15. So it's difficult to say how much advantage it gave him.
There are several accounts from people who escaped while he was reloading. A ten round magazine would have given them more opportunities. He was obviously relying on volume of fire, not shooting expertise.
There is a famous saying "God made them all, Colt made them all equal."
A gun is the great equalizer. With what other weapon could a 90lb man defend himself against a 200lb muscleman attacker? With what other weapon could a man defend himself against multiple attackers? How about the rapist who can over power his victim? Not when she shoots him.
Guns save more lives than they take, but we don't hear about that. We don't hear about the hundreds of times a criminal breaks in a house and runs away when the home owner pulls a gun. We don't hear about the thousands of times in Shall Issue states criminals think twice about a crime because the victim might be armed.
I do feel horrible for those who died,but I try to keep perspective. Could a gun ban have saved those lives? Maybe, (criminals don't usually obey the law) but how many other cases of self defense would have gone the other way.
And after all, in the USA, criminals are exempt from gun control. US v. Haynes (1968) held that criminals don't need to register guns because it would amount to self incrimination.
You can't take down a giant grizzly bear with a handgun or a shotgun, simple as that. For the most aggressive of all bears, I wouldn't trust buckshot. A 44 straight to the vital parts is the only way to take down a bear. Where I live, there's always an outside chance of seeing a bear or a cougar.
A gun is the great equalizer. With what other weapon could a 90lb man defend himself against a 200lb muscleman attacker? With what other weapon could a man defend himself against multiple attackers? How about the rapist who can over power his victim? Not when she shoots him.
Guns save more lives than they take, but we don't hear about that. We don't hear about the hundreds of times a criminal breaks in a house and runs away when the home owner pulls a gun. We don't hear about the thousands of times in Shall Issue states criminals think twice about a crime because the victim might be armed.
I do feel horrible for those who died,but I try to keep perspective. Could a gun ban have saved those lives? Maybe, (criminals don't usually obey the law) but how many other cases of self defense would have gone the other way.
And after all, in the USA, criminals are exempt from gun control. US v. Haynes (1968) held that criminals don't need to register guns because it would amount to self incrimination.
That reminds me of something that happened on the bus around here. Some hoodrat kids were talking about how they wanted to pop this suburb's houses. I then made a phone call to all my friends from that same suburb and told them to spread the word that there's going to be a crime spree in the area and to get their guns ready. The hoodrats' look on their faces turned from arrogance to outright shock and fear. There was no crime spree, although the hoodrats did try to get into my face. I simply did another form of self defense on them when I kicked a pole as hard as I could and pointed in their direction. They looked even more mortified.
Moral of the story: Crooks are cowards who only fear brutality.
You could take one out if you were Chuck Norris
You could take one out if you were Chuck Norris
A guy beat a grizzly to death a few years back with a tree limb, but I'm not planning on trading in my 10mm auto for a club anytime soon. Talk about bragging rights though...
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
HereComesTheRain wrote:
Grizzlies are successfully taken with big bore magnum handguns fairly often, simple as that.
A short barreled shotgun with slugs (sometimes 00 buckshot, too) are commonly carried in bear country, as well.
Usually a "44" is a handgun or at least a handgun caliber carbine.
Either way it's irrelevant to the shooting in Aurora that some unprincipled people are using as a springboard to more gun control.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
LKL wrote:
It really doesn't matter what a hi-capacity magazine is good for in anyone's opinion.
It wouldn't make much difference if those idiots in Washington banned hi-cap mags or not, as many millions of them that are already in the public sector.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ufkwTM82e4[/youtube]I wish we were more like Switzerland, and people wonder why switzerland has very little crime! Because everybody owns a gun.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
I've always admired the way the Swiss have their national defense set up. It's a success story any small country (or even a larger one) could learn from.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
America used to be like that. While General Yamato probably never actually said "I cannot invade America, there is a rifle behind every blade of grass" the general sentiment is true.
For someone to invade America or Switzerland would be incredibly hard. Why do you see dictatorships always ban civilian ownership of firearms?
http://www.gainesville.com/article/2012 ... ?p=2&tc=ar
This shows a great video of what happens when two little hoodrats encounter a law abiding citizen with a firearm.
thewhitrbbit wrote:
The expressions on their faces must have been priceless the moment the tables turned.
From smug confidence to terror in the space of a second or two.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
You can't take down a giant grizzly bear with a handgun or a shotgun, simple as that. For the most aggressive of all bears, I wouldn't trust buckshot. A 44 straight to the vital parts is the only way to take down a bear. Where I live, there's always an outside chance of seeing a bear or a cougar.
My grandpa (in his 70's) took two black bears with a regular hunting rifle. No Grizzlies in my state, nor in most of the lower 48. I have no problem with people in rural areas carrying the weapons they need to protect themselves from the wildlife that lives there.
You can't take down a giant grizzly bear with a handgun or a shotgun, simple as that. For the most aggressive of all bears, I wouldn't trust buckshot. A 44 straight to the vital parts is the only way to take down a bear. Where I live, there's always an outside chance of seeing a bear or a cougar.
My grandpa (in his 70's) took two black bears with a regular hunting rifle. No Grizzlies in my state, nor in most of the lower 48. I have no problem with people in rural areas carrying the weapons they need to protect themselves from the wildlife that lives there.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList

