Page 9 of 15 [ 227 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 15  Next

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

14 Jul 2017, 5:02 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Putin was able to cast doubt against Clinton with fake news and cyber warfare, that, cumulatively, enough inconsequential fly over states were able to put Trump over the top with the electoral votes.


Citation please. Evidence please. Which ones of the 306 electors who voted for Trump where influenced by Putin?


Those electors followed the vote of their states, and went for Trump. It was those red state voters who believed the fake news about pizza/pedophile cults and Benghazi crap. Were it up to the popular vote, or even if the electoral college actually assigned proper numbers due to population size per state, Clinton would be in the White House today.


If this, if that, if only. But none of that is reality. What evidence is there that Putin got any of those electors to vote for Trump? The thousands of democrats who sent them thousands of death threats certainly tried to influence their vote, that's a known fact. But is there any evidence that Putin swayed them in any way?


Again, those electors voted the way their states went. It was the citizens of those states who were unduly influenced by Putin. And even if Trump would have won without Putin's help, the fact of the mounting evidence shows how he and his people were working hand-in-glove with the Russians, which is treasonous.


As for treason, what about the DNC working hand in glove with a foreign government, with Clinton's knowledge, to win the election?



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

14 Jul 2017, 11:17 am

Now, more information emerges about the meeting, and Team T changes their story AGAIN. Oh yeah, at that meeting there was an American citizen of Russian origin, who served in Military Intel, and now works as a lobbyist here in the US. Veselnitskaya told NBC, which contradicted their current story, and they immediately rearranged their lies to match.

There's a dam on the R side against expressing outrage at this behavior, but the water is rising fast behind it.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

14 Jul 2017, 11:55 am

It's quite possible that the Electors were not directly influenced by Putin. It's probable, in fact.

But there were some pretty large states, with a large amount of electoral votes, which Trump won narrowly. Perhaps, a few people were directly, or indirectly, swayed by a Russian propaganda campaign against Clinton, and for Trump. Perhaps run by Putin, perhaps not.

Strategically, it was in Russia's best interest to promote Trump over any Democrat.

Obama gave Putin (hence, Russia), lots of "agita" for furthering their designs upon Ukraine (and, specifically, the Crimea). Sanctions were put on Russia for these "designs." Russia sensed that Trump would remove the sanctions; hence, it was in Russia's best interest to promote Trump for the US Presidency. Economic and global-political interests.



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

14 Jul 2017, 12:32 pm

The success or failure of the underlying crime doesn't matter for a criminal conspiracy. If you help commit a crime, or help conceal it, that's enough whether or not the crime yielded any gains.

The one DNC consultant sought information from a foreign government about an internal criminal probe which involved Manafort.

Top officials in the Trump campaign, his relatives, sought information from a foreign government about their ongoing criminal espionage activities in that campaign.

Is the difference clear yet?


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

14 Jul 2017, 1:52 pm

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Putin was able to cast doubt against Clinton with fake news and cyber warfare, that, cumulatively, enough inconsequential fly over states were able to put Trump over the top with the electoral votes.


Citation please. Evidence please. Which ones of the 306 electors who voted for Trump where influenced by Putin?


Those electors followed the vote of their states, and went for Trump. It was those red state voters who believed the fake news about pizza/pedophile cults and Benghazi crap. Were it up to the popular vote, or even if the electoral college actually assigned proper numbers due to population size per state, Clinton would be in the White House today.


If this, if that, if only. But none of that is reality. What evidence is there that Putin got any of those electors to vote for Trump? The thousands of democrats who sent them thousands of death threats certainly tried to influence their vote, that's a known fact. But is there any evidence that Putin swayed them in any way?


Again, those electors voted the way their states went. It was the citizens of those states who were unduly influenced by Putin. And even if Trump would have won without Putin's help, the fact of the mounting evidence shows how he and his people were working hand-in-glove with the Russians, which is treasonous.


As for treason, what about the DNC working hand in glove with a foreign government, with Clinton's knowledge, to win the election?


Jrjones explains very well how there was a Democratic interest in Paul Manifort, Putin's American fixer, and his operations in Ukraine. Not the same thing as what the Trump team did.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

14 Jul 2017, 5:41 pm

I haven't heard the FOX analysis, but it appears most people would have definitely NOT taken that meeting.

It seems like Loretta Lynch is to blame. Wait, what? Oh, it's ultimately Obama's fault, as always.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

14 Jul 2017, 6:04 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Putin was able to cast doubt against Clinton with fake news and cyber warfare, that, cumulatively, enough inconsequential fly over states were able to put Trump over the top with the electoral votes.


Citation please. Evidence please. Which ones of the 306 electors who voted for Trump where influenced by Putin?


Those electors followed the vote of their states, and went for Trump. It was those red state voters who believed the fake news about pizza/pedophile cults and Benghazi crap. Were it up to the popular vote, or even if the electoral college actually assigned proper numbers due to population size per state, Clinton would be in the White House today.


If this, if that, if only. But none of that is reality. What evidence is there that Putin got any of those electors to vote for Trump? The thousands of democrats who sent them thousands of death threats certainly tried to influence their vote, that's a known fact. But is there any evidence that Putin swayed them in any way?


Again, those electors voted the way their states went. It was the citizens of those states who were unduly influenced by Putin. And even if Trump would have won without Putin's help, the fact of the mounting evidence shows how he and his people were working hand-in-glove with the Russians, which is treasonous.


As for treason, what about the DNC working hand in glove with a foreign government, with Clinton's knowledge, to win the election?


Jrjones explains very well how there was a Democratic interest in Paul Manifort, Putin's American fixer, and his operations in Ukraine. Not the same thing as what the Trump team did.


Sounds like the same thing for different reasons but with the same ultimate goal. Naturally there's going to be a "but that was different" defense.

It's fun to discuss, but it's all moot. Like with Trump's interactions with Comey there's a bunch of people running around claiming crime and even treason, but all the experts in the law are saying nope. It looks bad politically sure, but that's probably as far as it will go, like with everything else so far.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

14 Jul 2017, 7:40 pm

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Putin was able to cast doubt against Clinton with fake news and cyber warfare, that, cumulatively, enough inconsequential fly over states were able to put Trump over the top with the electoral votes.


Citation please. Evidence please. Which ones of the 306 electors who voted for Trump where influenced by Putin?


Those electors followed the vote of their states, and went for Trump. It was those red state voters who believed the fake news about pizza/pedophile cults and Benghazi crap. Were it up to the popular vote, or even if the electoral college actually assigned proper numbers due to population size per state, Clinton would be in the White House today.


If this, if that, if only. But none of that is reality. What evidence is there that Putin got any of those electors to vote for Trump? The thousands of democrats who sent them thousands of death threats certainly tried to influence their vote, that's a known fact. But is there any evidence that Putin swayed them in any way?


Again, those electors voted the way their states went. It was the citizens of those states who were unduly influenced by Putin. And even if Trump would have won without Putin's help, the fact of the mounting evidence shows how he and his people were working hand-in-glove with the Russians, which is treasonous.


As for treason, what about the DNC working hand in glove with a foreign government, with Clinton's knowledge, to win the election?


Jrjones explains very well how there was a Democratic interest in Paul Manifort, Putin's American fixer, and his operations in Ukraine. Not the same thing as what the Trump team did.


Sounds like the same thing for different reasons but with the same ultimate goal. Naturally there's going to be a "but that was different" defense.

It's fun to discuss, but it's all moot. Like with Trump's interactions with Comey there's a bunch of people running around claiming crime and even treason, but all the experts in the law are saying nope. It looks bad politically sure, but that's probably as far as it will go, like with everything else so far.


The difference is, the Democrats never lied about such inquiries, nor did they ever fire anyone in charge of an investigation into said inquiries. The Democrats have nothing to hide on this subject, but Trump and company definitely do. That implies something illegal.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

15 Jul 2017, 12:13 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
The difference is, the Democrats never lied about such inquiries, nor did they ever fire anyone in charge of an investigation into said inquiries. The Democrats have nothing to hide on this subject, but Trump and company definitely do. That implies something illegal.


What does Trump and company definitely have to hide on this subject at this point?



DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

15 Jul 2017, 12:28 am

Does this really have to be an all-or-nothing issue?

Yeah, the Russians probably influenced the American election, but there were plenty of other factors at work.

Furthermore, America has influenced Russian elections in the past. America meddled with the post-Soviet elections in order to get Yeltsin into power. That was a disaster for the Russian people ... but it was another victory for corporate America.

What goes around comes around I guess.


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

15 Jul 2017, 12:47 am

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
The difference is, the Democrats never lied about such inquiries, nor did they ever fire anyone in charge of an investigation into said inquiries. The Democrats have nothing to hide on this subject, but Trump and company definitely do. That implies something illegal.


What does Trump and company definitely have to hide on this subject at this point?

They have failed at hiding a lot, so far.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Jul 2017, 1:33 am

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
The difference is, the Democrats never lied about such inquiries, nor did they ever fire anyone in charge of an investigation into said inquiries. The Democrats have nothing to hide on this subject, but Trump and company definitely do. That implies something illegal.


What does Trump and company definitely have to hide on this subject at this point?


Must be pretty bad, considering that Trump fired his head of the FBI. Why would they be lying about such meetings with the Russians if there's nothing there?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

15 Jul 2017, 5:15 am

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Does this really have to be an all-or-nothing issue?

Yeah, the Russians probably influenced the American election, but there were plenty of other factors at work.

Furthermore, America has influenced Russian elections in the past. America meddled with the post-Soviet elections in order to get Yeltsin into power. That was a disaster for the Russian people ... but it was another victory for corporate America.

What goes around comes around I guess.


My thoughts exactly. And no nation has ever done anything as bad to the US as it's done to others. Japan attacks Peal Harbor, the US nukes Nagasaki and Hiroshima.



EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

15 Jul 2017, 5:28 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
The difference is, the Democrats never lied about such inquiries, nor did they ever fire anyone in charge of an investigation into said inquiries. The Democrats have nothing to hide on this subject, but Trump and company definitely do. That implies something illegal.


What does Trump and company definitely have to hide on this subject at this point?


Must be pretty bad, considering that Trump fired his head of the FBI. Why would they be lying about such meetings with the Russians if there's nothing there?


That's just speculation though.

What I noticed with junior's meeting with the Russian is that it didn't take years of investigating to find out about it. And there was no lack of disclosure or anonymous parties involved. Who, what, when, where, why and how were all clearly spelled out. To me that's what something genuine looks like.

Compare that to the other stuff that contains no details and has anonymous sources, that's comprised entirely of claims, accusations, speculation and innuendo and is supposed to require years of investigation. To me that's what something bogus looks like.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

15 Jul 2017, 9:18 am

Trump Jr. "forgot" to mention a couple of participants in the meeting.
Donald Trump Jr: Former Soviet counterintelligence officer confirms he attended Russian lawyer meeting

Quote:
Mr Akhmetshin has been active in Washington for a number of years, mostly on Russia-related issues Hermitage Capital Management
A Russian former military operative with links to counterintelligence also attended Donald Trump Jr’s notorious meeting with a Russian lawyer about obtaining possibly incriminating information about Hillary Clinton.

Rinat Akhmetshin, a dual Russian-American citizen and lobbyist who has been accused of acting as “an unregistered agent for Russian interests” and with ties to Russian military intelligence service, or GRU, has confirmed he attended the meeting with lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya.

Also participating in the meeting was a US-based Russian translator, Anatoli Samochornov, who had worked previously for Ms Veselnitskaya and the US State Department at various points.

Trump contradicts his son and suggests he knew about lawyer meeting
Mr Akhmetshin said he accompanied Ms Veselnitskaya to Trump Tower on 9 June 2016. Although he had known and worked with Ms Veselnitskaya for a number of years, he said he had only learned about the meeting that day when she asked him to attend. He said he showed up in jeans and a T-shirt.

Mr Trump Jr’s account of the meeting, which has shifted several times, failed to mention the presence of Mr Akhmetshin, or the translator.

Mr Akhmetshin said Ms Veselnitskaya brought a plastic folder with her, containing printed documents that detailed what she believed could potentially be the flow of illicit funds to the Democratic National Committee. Ms Veselnitskaya presented the contents of the documents to the Trump associates and suggested that making the information public could help the Trump campaign, he said.

Mr Trump Jr asked the lawyer if she had all the evidence to back up her claims, according to Mr Akhmetshin, including whether she could demonstrate the flow of the money. But Ms Veselnitskaya allegedly claimed the Trump campaign would need to research it more.

After that exchange, Mr Trump Jr lost interest, Mr Akhmetshin said. “They couldn’t wait for the meeting to end,” he told the Associated Press.

Mr Akhmetshin said he does not know if Ms Veselnitskaya’s documents were provided by the Russian government. He said he thinks she left the materials with the Trump associates. It was unclear if she handed the documents to anyone in the room, or simply left them behind, he said.

Mr Akhmetshin has denied that he worked for the GRU, saying he served in the Soviet Army from 1986 to 1988 after he was drafted but was not trained in spy tradecraft. He said his unit operated in the Baltics and was “loosely part of counterintelligence”.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 15 Jul 2017, 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

15 Jul 2017, 9:53 am

^ How can what that guy says be trusted? he's a Russian :wink: