Does anyone else agree with feminism?
ArrantPariah wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Oh, it's always my turn when it comes to hyperlexian.
Oh, you aren't her exclusive customer.
But I'll tell you one thing: making an argument against feminism, however reasoned, will get you spanked.
oops i made a mistake and warned a couple of feminists in this thread too (and removed a few of their posts).
Accidently spanked some feminists too, eh?
i did heeheehee
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
Ragtime wrote:
Question for ValWig: Are all men who are not feminists misogynists?
I mean, you fully agreed with the quote that says all male babies are the future abusers of women, so it's a much shorter leap to say all non-feminist men are misogynists. I mean, isn't it a horrible, horrible, horrible thing to you when a man declines to become a feminist? Doesn't it mean he hates women? Isn't that the only explanation, as far as your thinking is concerned.
Dang, I guess since I'm a male, I might as well go abuse some women, because, after all, that feminist I quoted says woman-abuse is in my future because I'm male. I mean, men who believe her might decide it's not even wrong to abuse women, but rather just their destiny as men. Do you see how damaging such a quote can be? Why would a man bother behaving civilly toward women his whole life if he will always be branded an abuser regardless of his behavior? I mean, it's like if I were fined for speeding before I sped, fined in preparation for when I speed. Ya, that's pretty f'd up isn't it? I mean, maybe if you feminists call enough innocent men "abusers" enough times, that will eventually sink into some of their heads by sheer repetition, and they'll actually fulfill your diagnosis and become abusers of women. Oh, but then that just helps to feed the feminist line -- by creating more female victims, just like PETA kills certain animals in mass slaughter to save others, and Rev Jackson constantly race-baits in order to fight racism.
I mean, you fully agreed with the quote that says all male babies are the future abusers of women, so it's a much shorter leap to say all non-feminist men are misogynists. I mean, isn't it a horrible, horrible, horrible thing to you when a man declines to become a feminist? Doesn't it mean he hates women? Isn't that the only explanation, as far as your thinking is concerned.
Dang, I guess since I'm a male, I might as well go abuse some women, because, after all, that feminist I quoted says woman-abuse is in my future because I'm male. I mean, men who believe her might decide it's not even wrong to abuse women, but rather just their destiny as men. Do you see how damaging such a quote can be? Why would a man bother behaving civilly toward women his whole life if he will always be branded an abuser regardless of his behavior? I mean, it's like if I were fined for speeding before I sped, fined in preparation for when I speed. Ya, that's pretty f'd up isn't it? I mean, maybe if you feminists call enough innocent men "abusers" enough times, that will eventually sink into some of their heads by sheer repetition, and they'll actually fulfill your diagnosis and become abusers of women. Oh, but then that just helps to feed the feminist line -- by creating more female victims, just like PETA kills certain animals in mass slaughter to save others, and Rev Jackson constantly race-baits in order to fight racism.
I thought you liked honest debate? What is this condescending tripe? Are you unaware that you are a strawman factory?
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
hyperlexian wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Well, as I asked you pages ago, give us the truth about women, hyper, since you apparently know it, as you claim that my wife didn't state it accurately.
we are all different.
Okay, then. So we are in agreement. Then I have no idea what the point of feminism even is, if all women are different and therefore have different opinions of how to live and interact in society, nor do I know what the point was of you implying that my wife should change her lifestyle. You don't even know her, so your advice made no sense. And not all women are feminist, or even feministic in their thinking. Yet, you believe feminism is right, and many feminists think all women should be feminists. Doesn't that very idea go against feminism's premise that women can and should do as they please, being the complex and independent people that they are? Feminism preaches, but its very premise is that women should neither be preached to nor preached about.
See, there's just all kinds of hypocrisy built-in to feminism, and that's why most guys and many women are just annoyed with the movement.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Last edited by Ragtime on 06 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm, edited 3 times in total.
AspieRogue wrote:
Me thinks this video is quite fitting for this seemingly endless debate about feminism and teh ensuing battle of the sexes:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xW8q2TjS7hA[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xW8q2TjS7hA[/youtube]
I wouldn't call it a battle of the sexes
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
AspieRogue wrote:
Vigilians, did you not hear the lyrics?
I've heard it said, that all is fair
in love and war, so what's life for?
the boy and girl, two separate worlds
the endless tug of war!
I've heard it said, that all is fair
in love and war, so what's life for?
the boy and girl, two separate worlds
the endless tug of war!
No I did not listen to the song
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
DW_a_mom wrote:
Mirror wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
Mirror wrote:
Women are easily controlled and manipulated. They are emotionally based creatures who's thought process governs what they feel.
Men are stronger and more logical. They can use there strength to over power a women.
A good man will use his strength to protect a women and his logic to care and maintain her life and there children.
Bad men abuse that power because men naturally see women as beautiful and something they must have and use there strength and power for lust.
So I believe that it is biological.
Men are stronger and more logical. They can use there strength to over power a women.
A good man will use his strength to protect a women and his logic to care and maintain her life and there children.
Bad men abuse that power because men naturally see women as beautiful and something they must have and use there strength and power for lust.
So I believe that it is biological.
i am not emotionally based in the slightest; i am logical and rational. i am also physically and mentally strong, and people who know me well have called me fearless. if you're going to draw conclusions about your entire gender, you need to make statements that include women like me. otherwise you are speaking inaccurately.
I am rational, logical but I become govern by my emotions. (ie. when I see a puppy I want to touch or when I want to snuggle or have sex or when I PMS) I am very much tied to my emotions when it comes to many daily things. I am not physically stronger then a man. Many women are not. I am fearless when it comes to spiders and bugs but not when it comes to needles and dentists. I can be mentally strong depending on the situation. I can excel in many things and fail at others.
I am only giving a general idea of how women are. I'm sorry if it came out to matter-fact-ly. Most women are govern by emotions. It is not something to be ashamed of like it is a weakness to over come. I celebrate my femininity because it makes me soft and kind and easy to talk to.
And I'm not a typical women either. To my husband, I'm more of a tomboy. All my friends growing up where boys till I met my best friend who was a tommish girl like me. I don't dress in dresses. I don't do much with my hair. I Like to be comfortable and modest. Sometimes I put makeup on when we go out and paint my nails every once and a while. I just have learned who I am and my limits early in life. I'm not assertive. I am meek. I learned that if you treat people with respect they treat you with respect. When I was polite they were kind to me back. And being polite and kind and happen to be a women fell in place for me. Men treated me with respect and would look out for me and I like it because it makes me feel safe and that's how men should make there women feel. Safe and secure and well loved and taken care for. Why fight tooth and nail to become a man. To have to work against your nature to prove, mostly to yourself, that you can be better then they are. This is why I don't understand feminism. Why fight to be seen as exactly equal. We are the same under law. What is wrong with being different. I want a man to see me as a beautiful women to be taken care of. I can't imagine how a man would want to marry a feminist.
I was shocked when I read your original statement. So quickly asserting that ALL women are the same, when nothing could be further from the truth! There are women who are more logical than the men in their lives, and men who are more emotional than the women in their lives, and so on. Broad generalizations are ALWAYS offensive.
The average feminist isn't trying to be a man, she is trying to be recognized for who she is, whether that be smart, logical, weak, strong, sexy, plain, a great cook, or a great machinist, without someone saying, "you're a woman, therefore you must be X." It is the assumption that is stiffling, and the same is true when men are forced to grow up with "boys can't cry" stereotypes. If you are comfortable around men who make you feel protected, go for it, but don't assume that every woman should or does have the same desires or needs.
I grew up with a father who didn't want to send any his daughters to college, given that (his words) we'd all just get married, and no self respecting man would let his wife work. Well, I went to college anyway, and it is a good thing because I had to support myself until I was 36 and even now our family relies on the fact that I can earn good money any time there is a need for it (like when my AS husband stresses out and needs to quit his job). My older sister took my dad's word for it and has had to settle for doing less than she is capable of her whole life, and has never married. It is THAT sort of limiting role play that feminists fought against, and you are too young to have a clue what it was like before, the world where my brilliant aunt spent her life as a secretary to a prominent researcher, basically did all his thinking for him, and never got credit nor a decent wage. It has nothing to do with trying to be a man, and everything to do with being allowed to be who you are, and receiving credit for it. You are living the benefits, just as I am, and yet give nothing but disdain to those who cleared that path for you.
I don't fit in anyone's box, either, and I like it that way. I have a top notch intellect, don't have the patience for housework, and would have loved to have been Miss America. Go figure.
Please don't don't limit anyone with over generalizations that can never fit.
...
One more tidbit to ponder: ever choose to wear pants to school and not think twice about it?Thank feminism. When I started school, girls were required to wear dresses, they claimed girls thought better in dresses. Tell me, does your intellect change depending on what you are wearing? Nah, mine doesn't either. So much hogwash invented by men who wanted to believe they knew everything oh so much better simply by being male ...
I much prefer today's world where some men do the cooking, some women earn the money, yet most actually choose to do things the way they have been done for generations ... and wear jeans while doing it.
I honestly don't know what to say. :/ I am sorry to say that women think emotionally because I was remembering a study done on babies showing that when presented with a doll or a ball. The majority of the female babies went for the doll and examine the face while the majority of males went for the ball and examined it shape. And it showed, that at an early age we are already drown to different object preferences with out much influence. The case study concluded that men are spatial thinking incline while women who are emotional thinking incline. Spatial, the ball is geometrical, logical in it's appearance. Emotional, because the face of the doll is human, it conveyed an emotion.
Now these were NT babies. I know, especially on these boards, that we are not the average. I was getting that we are similarly different and I showed you in previous posts that I am not the average women myself. I am considered more spatial thinking on tests. But that doesn't mean that I don't admit to be govern by my emotions threw life. That I don't succumb to PMS. In fact, I just remembered about Indra Nooyi. She's the chairman and CEO of Pepsi Cola. The second larges food and beverage distributor IN THE WORLD! And she grew up very poor in India. Having to walk miles to get water everyday. And the most humblest attitude. She is not a feminist. Googled it and couldn't find anything saying she was. She had drive and did it. In the most poorest of nations. I admire her because she is true to herself and got what she wanted.
In general, I can clearly say I do not like the feminist attitude. It's illogical and selfish. While there are other women in the world fighting for there own HUMAN RIGHTS. Little girls having acid thrown in there face because they were going to school. 68 year old men marrying children. Men, Women and children killed for not practicing Islam. (These are all radical Islamic states by the way) And, sadly, these are things that we, outsiders of the perpetrators body, can't fix. The heart and mind of the men who do these actions must change. And unless we can change the heart and soul of a person, we can not help them. And I know that sounds cold but it's true. Unless they see what they did as very wrong and disgusting and want to turn from it. It's Hopeless.
Western world feminists are fighting for truly nothing. Go and do what you want to do!! No one is stopping you but yourself! Consider yourself lucky to be born in these states! Why fight a battle that, pretty much, no longer exists. WE SHOULD BE VERY THANKFUL AND GRATEFUL TO LIVE WHERE WE LIVE!! I KNOW I AM!!
This is why feminism is just so ridicules to me.
I am a Woman and I am not a feminist.
_________________
I'm Ragtime's wife! :V
Mirror wrote:
I honestly don't know what to say. :/ I am sorry to say that women think emotionally because I was remembering a study done on babies showing that when presented with a doll or a ball. The majority of the female babies went for the doll and examine the face while the majority of males went for the ball and examined it shape. And it showed, that at an early age we are already drown to different object preferences with out much influence. The case study concluded that men are spatial thinking incline while women who are emotional thinking incline. Spatial, the ball is geometrical, logical in it's appearance. Emotional, because the face of the doll is human, it conveyed an emotion.
Source?
Going by my mom's daycare that isn't true. My mom would take some pictures of the 3 year old boys that dressed up themselves (she didn't ask them to or anything like that) in princess dresses. Was really funny with the macho dads. My mom takes a ton of pictures so she wasn't singling out anything.
Alexender wrote:
Mirror wrote:
I honestly don't know what to say. :/ I am sorry to say that women think emotionally because I was remembering a study done on babies showing that when presented with a doll or a ball. The majority of the female babies went for the doll and examine the face while the majority of males went for the ball and examined it shape. And it showed, that at an early age we are already drown to different object preferences with out much influence. The case study concluded that men are spatial thinking incline while women who are emotional thinking incline. Spatial, the ball is geometrical, logical in it's appearance. Emotional, because the face of the doll is human, it conveyed an emotion.
Source?
Going by my mom's daycare that isn't true. My mom would take some pictures of the 3 year old boys that dressed up themselves (she didn't ask them to or anything like that) in princess dresses. Was really funny with the macho dads. My mom takes a ton of pictures so she wasn't singling out anything.
Sex differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year-olds' toy-choice:PDF
_________________
I'm Ragtime's wife! :V
AspieRogue wrote:
And if she is deceitful about using birth control, than her responsibility increases to 100%.
Or actually deliberately sabotages the birth control - there have been cases in the past of women sabotaging condoms (http://www.google.com/search?q=women%20sabotaging%20condoms&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8) and the like. Surely that should be as much a crime as if men did it to women, as also often happens? Some nasty creeps try to impregnate prostitutes for instance.
ArrantPariah wrote:
Anway, there was an interesting article written by Samantha Brick
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1r0g9S41b
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1r0g9S41b
A lot of people laughed like buggery at that article - me included. Some of the 'hideous comments' people made to her were spot on.
Tequila wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Anway, there was an interesting article written by Samantha Brick
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1r0g9S41b
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1r0g9S41b
A lot of people laughed like buggery at that article - me included. Some of the 'hideous comments' people made to her were spot on.
:V I know! Her smile and stare are creepy!! lol
_________________
I'm Ragtime's wife! :V
Tequila wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Anway, there was an interesting article written by Samantha Brick
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1r0g9S41b
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1r0g9S41b
A lot of people laughed like buggery at that article - me included. Some of the 'hideous comments' people made to her were spot on.
I think she is kind of arrogant, but the comments lead me to the conclusion that good looking people should not bring light to personal problems caused by their appearance as they will be set upon by jeering, ravenous hordes of unsympathetic people who think they know better
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Mirror wrote:
Tequila wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Anway, there was an interesting article written by Samantha Brick
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1r0g9S41b
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1r0g9S41b
A lot of people laughed like buggery at that article - me included. Some of the 'hideous comments' people made to her were spot on.
:V I know! Her smile and stare are creepy!! lol
Now that I finished the article. I agree that I don't like women who snipe and throw you under the bus because of what you look like. SOOOOOooo Many Women do this to one another. I've experienced it a few time in my life to. (Like the first time I tried to get hired at this job I'm getting and an older, homely, kind of over weight women out right refused to tell me the average starting pay and if there is health insurance plan and did not give me an employment form. All saying that she was not allowed to in a very mater-a-face short way. Like it was law and that I shouldn't even be asking those questions? I don't know if she was just an employee or someone higher up. But It IS law to answer those questions! And you are supposed to give a form for people who ask even if you are not hiring right then.)
It's so weird that women are like this to one another. That's why it's my motto to not work under a female boss. I did three times and it was hell. They are not stable and logical in there decision making and management. Especially when they PMS. From experience, working under a male boss has been stable and easy. The rules never changed! It was cut and dry what not to do and what to do! I didn't have to tip toe around them when doing something or asking questions worrying whether I was going to get in trouble! Either because of how I asked the question. Or just asking the question. Or confirming that the question I asked is still correct because it becomes subject to change on her whim.
But now I'm off topic! :V
_________________
I'm Ragtime's wife! :V
Tequila wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:
And if she is deceitful about using birth control, than her responsibility increases to 100%.
Or actually deliberately sabotages the birth control - there have been cases in the past of women sabotaging condoms (http://www.google.com/search?q=women%20sabotaging%20condoms&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8) and the like. Surely that should be as much a crime as if men did it to women, as also often happens? Some nasty creeps try to impregnate prostitutes for instance.
Um, what you are describing is precisely what I was talking about. And while it isn't criminal, YET, in certain states such an act will automatically make said woman ineligible to receive child support from the baby daddy. Turns out there are men who do this sort of thing too. Especially if they have a live-in gf and he's supporting her financially. As I said before, there have been cases of men poking holes in their condoms, or replacing her bc pills with placebos while flushing the real ones down the toilet.
