How strong is the evidence that Jesus existed?

Page 10 of 22 [ 339 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 22  Next

MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

08 Dec 2011, 5:28 pm

Robdemanc wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:

And so what is your stance? That what the bible is saying is true? And that Jesus died and was risen 3 days later?


No, that what the Bible says goes against what you say. What the Bible says matters in the context of our discussion.


If the bible says jesus died and was reborn 3 days later, it does not go against what I say. In fact it supports what i say about the solstice.


You need to provide a logical connection between the two.

It's not enough to say that you perceive the solstice sun to act in a manner which seems to you like the Jesus story was inspired by it or something. That's subjective selective perception and not evidence.

Seriously, you need to read up on the falsehoods of Acharya S, since you're not finding me convincing at all. No actual expert agrees with that fraud. Not sure why you continue to cling to her wild beliefs.

Anyway, I don't like going in circles, so I'm going to stop here.



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

09 Dec 2011, 12:38 pm

MCalavera wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:

And so what is your stance? That what the bible is saying is true? And that Jesus died and was risen 3 days later?


No, that what the Bible says goes against what you say. What the Bible says matters in the context of our discussion.


If the bible says jesus died and was reborn 3 days later, it does not go against what I say. In fact it supports what i say about the solstice.


You need to provide a logical connection between the two.

It's not enough to say that you perceive the solstice sun to act in a manner which seems to you like the Jesus story was inspired by it or something. That's subjective selective perception and not evidence.

Seriously, you need to read up on the falsehoods of Acharya S, since you're not finding me convincing at all. No actual expert agrees with that fraud. Not sure why you continue to cling to her wild beliefs.

Anyway, I don't like going in circles, so I'm going to stop here.


Yeah whatever. These people are always criticizing each others theories and I doubt there are any "experts" in the matter. We are all capable of drawing our own conclusions.

I see credibility in the solar diety origin of jesus, you do not. There is no evidence either way, and there are NO experts in this field of study, which is a waste of time anyway.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,682
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

09 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm

I do believe that Kool Baby Jesus existed, after he was Ol' Dirty Ba$%^&d and Osirus....hmm...he died rather young as well.

As for Jesus of Nazareth; I'm agnostic. I do think 1000Knives has a point, the martyrs of mid to late 1st century AD must have had SOMETHING that they were throwing themselves fearlessly to the lions over, how much that's exactly what we think it is or isn't - we don't know and I have a feeling we'd have to make some grand discovery of an even earlier set of documents in order to shed much more light on the matter. Seems intuitive, the possibility that Jesus as perhaps a rabbi who's teachings became embellished to the stuff of legends - did exist but was merely human. Then again saying it intuitively makes sense just means that its plausible, not necessarily that its factual.

So: who knows...


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


NextFact
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 298

09 Dec 2011, 1:40 pm

Robdemanc wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
Yes very interesting I would say, and grounded in plain observable facts. The same observable facts that were available to our ancestors of the last 50 ,000 years, during which time we masterred agriculture and built civilisations and then made up religions. Humanity has been telling stories for as long as we could speak and were able to provide enough food in order to sit down and speculate for an hour or so. Stories are the main medium for passing on information to each other, down through generations.


What are the observable facts pertaining to what you say about the sun and about the Jesus story being derived from prior pagan myths?



The plain observable facts are the seasonal changes that take place. The 3 stars of orions belt, the southern cross, the star sirius, the fact that christmas day is the first day that an observer on Earth can tell that the sun is now in the ascension, and that midwinter has passed.

So this year when you are celebrating christmas day (if you do) you can know that for those of us in the northern hemisphere the shortest days have passed and the days are getting gradually longer.

Many thousands of years before the story of jesus, this would have been known to our ancestors all across Europe, Asia and the middle east, and northern africa.

There are no written documents because writing wasn't around, or if it was it was written in the sand perhaps. Verbal story telling would have been the method of communication.

And the story would be: At midwinter the sun dies for 3 days, it lies on the southern cross, but after the 3rd day it is ressurected and will return (it is reborn). The 3 kings (stars of orions belt) are aligned with the bright star to the east (sirius) and point to the location of the birthplace of the saviour (our sun).

Also there is speculation that the three pyrimids at Giza were built to mirror the three stars of orions belt, and the Egyptians buried their kings in these pyrimids.

It is not concrete (or stone) evidence, but it is very intriguing and compelling correlations to how the ancient mind was working.


Wonderful robd,

It is true that the Christianity is sun worship, Jesus Christ being the Sun personified. A continuation of the old sun worship cult mythology, that is the deep dark secret of the Church. It will probably be some time before philosophy and reason abolishes this fraud called Christianity, which has been perverted for the purpose of acquiring power, influence and wealth. I don't understand how so many people can't see this. I think humanity has a natural predisposition, or desire, to want to trust and believe in others, which isn't really a bad thing, but it can be and has been extensively taken advantage of and exploited for all the wrong reasons by a handful of people throughout history for their own selfish desires and personal gain, Christianity is one of the best example of this.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

09 Dec 2011, 5:27 pm

Robdemanc wrote:
Yeah whatever. These people are always criticizing each others theories and I doubt there are any "experts" in the matter. We are all capable of drawing our own conclusions.


Since this is a new point to address from you, I'm going to comment.

No, real experts don't dispute the historical likelihood of Jesus' existence nor do they wonder whether the Jesus character was copied from prior myths or not (because they know this "thesis" is ridiculous).



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

09 Dec 2011, 5:47 pm

NextFact wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
Yes very interesting I would say, and grounded in plain observable facts. The same observable facts that were available to our ancestors of the last 50 ,000 years, during which time we masterred agriculture and built civilisations and then made up religions. Humanity has been telling stories for as long as we could speak and were able to provide enough food in order to sit down and speculate for an hour or so. Stories are the main medium for passing on information to each other, down through generations.


What are the observable facts pertaining to what you say about the sun and about the Jesus story being derived from prior pagan myths?



The plain observable facts are the seasonal changes that take place. The 3 stars of orions belt, the southern cross, the star sirius, the fact that christmas day is the first day that an observer on Earth can tell that the sun is now in the ascension, and that midwinter has passed.

So this year when you are celebrating christmas day (if you do) you can know that for those of us in the northern hemisphere the shortest days have passed and the days are getting gradually longer.

Many thousands of years before the story of jesus, this would have been known to our ancestors all across Europe, Asia and the middle east, and northern africa.

There are no written documents because writing wasn't around, or if it was it was written in the sand perhaps. Verbal story telling would have been the method of communication.

And the story would be: At midwinter the sun dies for 3 days, it lies on the southern cross, but after the 3rd day it is ressurected and will return (it is reborn). The 3 kings (stars of orions belt) are aligned with the bright star to the east (sirius) and point to the location of the birthplace of the saviour (our sun).

Also there is speculation that the three pyrimids at Giza were built to mirror the three stars of orions belt, and the Egyptians buried their kings in these pyrimids.

It is not concrete (or stone) evidence, but it is very intriguing and compelling correlations to how the ancient mind was working.


Wonderful robd,

It is true that the Christianity is sun worship, Jesus Christ being the Sun personified. A continuation of the old sun worship cult mythology, that is the deep dark secret of the Church. It will probably be some time before philosophy and reason abolishes this fraud called Christianity, which has been perverted for the purpose of acquiring power, influence and wealth. I don't understand how so many people can't see this. I think humanity has a natural predisposition, or desire, to want to trust and believe in others, which isn't really a bad thing, but it can be and has been extensively taken advantage of and exploited for all the wrong reasons by a handful of people throughout history for their own selfish desires and personal gain, Christianity is one of the best example of this.


Evidence please. No more non-academic nonsense.

I bet you you also haven't read any mythology story of the time.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Dec 2011, 7:05 pm

Robdemanc wrote:
We all know the flood story, as it seems does every single remote tribe and religion. Obviously it relates to a single environmental event that caused local flooding, or perhaps a rise in sea levels at the end of the last ice age.

It is no different from the fact that most religions from different times have a sun god, or practiced sun worship, had the notion of death and rebirth, and celebrated the winter solstice. Jesus is no different.


The Aztecs and Maya have no Flood Myth.

ruveyn



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

10 Dec 2011, 8:11 am

MCalavera wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
Yeah whatever. These people are always criticizing each others theories and I doubt there are any "experts" in the matter. We are all capable of drawing our own conclusions.


Since this is a new point to address from you, I'm going to comment.

No, real experts don't dispute the historical likelihood of Jesus' existence nor do they wonder whether the Jesus character was copied from prior myths or not (because they know this "thesis" is ridiculous).


Who are these experts you speak of? What are they experts in? From the sound of it they are experts at interpreting texts that are unverifiable writings of a long dead civilisation, so really they are wasting their time.

It is no secret that stonehenge, and many stone circles from various parts of Europe were constructed to enable the tracking of the movement of the sun, moon, stars and planets. All this happened thousands of years before the jesus story, and other modern day religions.

So the notion that astrotheology is the basis of all modern religions is as solid as Stonehenge. You may think it ridiculous (along with these "experts" you mention), because you would rather not accept a rational and non-supernatural explanation of how religion has come about.



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

10 Dec 2011, 8:26 am

ruveyn wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
We all know the flood story, as it seems does every single remote tribe and religion. Obviously it relates to a single environmental event that caused local flooding, or perhaps a rise in sea levels at the end of the last ice age.

It is no different from the fact that most religions from different times have a sun god, or practiced sun worship, had the notion of death and rebirth, and celebrated the winter solstice. Jesus is no different.


The Aztecs and Maya have no Flood Myth.

ruveyn


So what do you think that means?

I heard speculation that the flood myth could be the story of how the Black sea rose when the mediteranian sea rose. Apparently when the ice age ended around 10,000 years ago sea levels rose and the mediteranian sea levels rose and this filled up the Black Sea which was supposed to have been populated prior to that. Also it could be based on the Nile and the various floods that happen there. The point is a lot of the core bible stories are probably based on real natural events that our ancestors had no way of explaining.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

10 Dec 2011, 8:33 am

Bart Ehrman, Richard Carrier (a mythicist, mind you), Michael Grant, John Crossan, and even Robert Price (who is questionable as someone professing expertise). They (and many others) all disagree with Acharya S. And all whom I listed (with the exception of Robert Price) find her ideas to be ridiculous and contrary to what the evidence suggests.

You've been fooled, mate.

There is no real expert who believes what you claim. Get over it.



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

10 Dec 2011, 8:35 am

NextFact wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
Yes very interesting I would say, and grounded in plain observable facts. The same observable facts that were available to our ancestors of the last 50 ,000 years, during which time we masterred agriculture and built civilisations and then made up religions. Humanity has been telling stories for as long as we could speak and were able to provide enough food in order to sit down and speculate for an hour or so. Stories are the main medium for passing on information to each other, down through generations.


What are the observable facts pertaining to what you say about the sun and about the Jesus story being derived from prior pagan myths?



The plain observable facts are the seasonal changes that take place. The 3 stars of orions belt, the southern cross, the star sirius, the fact that christmas day is the first day that an observer on Earth can tell that the sun is now in the ascension, and that midwinter has passed.

So this year when you are celebrating christmas day (if you do) you can know that for those of us in the northern hemisphere the shortest days have passed and the days are getting gradually longer.

Many thousands of years before the story of jesus, this would have been known to our ancestors all across Europe, Asia and the middle east, and northern africa.

There are no written documents because writing wasn't around, or if it was it was written in the sand perhaps. Verbal story telling would have been the method of communication.

And the story would be: At midwinter the sun dies for 3 days, it lies on the southern cross, but after the 3rd day it is ressurected and will return (it is reborn). The 3 kings (stars of orions belt) are aligned with the bright star to the east (sirius) and point to the location of the birthplace of the saviour (our sun).

Also there is speculation that the three pyrimids at Giza were built to mirror the three stars of orions belt, and the Egyptians buried their kings in these pyrimids.

It is not concrete (or stone) evidence, but it is very intriguing and compelling correlations to how the ancient mind was working.


Wonderful robd,

It is true that the Christianity is sun worship, Jesus Christ being the Sun personified. A continuation of the old sun worship cult mythology, that is the deep dark secret of the Church. It will probably be some time before philosophy and reason abolishes this fraud called Christianity, which has been perverted for the purpose of acquiring power, influence and wealth. I don't understand how so many people can't see this. I think humanity has a natural predisposition, or desire, to want to trust and believe in others, which isn't really a bad thing, but it can be and has been extensively taken advantage of and exploited for all the wrong reasons by a handful of people throughout history for their own selfish desires and personal gain, Christianity is one of the best example of this.


I think most people lack the ability to think in the long view, and we have all been conditioned to accept the "nice" stories. Plus I think many years back in our history our beliefs were hyjacked by a minority in power who needed to control the masses. Religion was used to do this, and much simpler and primitive beliefs were decorated with mythical figures (like jesus) and people have been brainwashed ever since. I think you are right, humanity has this desire to trust what authority says, because for a lot of people their minds do not grow up. A bit like with AS, the AS mind can be said to be infantile when it comes to socialising, then for others their minds can be said to be infantile when it comes to looking at the big picture and seeing how things like religion have come about.

To me it is extremely plausible that christianity, and numerous other religions, have grown out of older, more basic, beliefs about the sun, moon, stars etc.



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

10 Dec 2011, 8:42 am

MCalavera wrote:
Bart Ehrman, Richard Carrier (a mythicist, mind you), Michael Grant, John Crossan, and even Robert Price (who is questionable as someone professing expertise). They (and many others) all disagree with Acharya S. And all whom I listed (with the exception of Robert Price) find her ideas to be ridiculous and contrary to what the evidence suggests.

You've been fooled, mate.

There is no real expert who believes what you claim. Get over it.


They are probably all closet christians or hindus or whatever. Or maybe they are just angry that someone else came up with this idea first.

Charles Darwin was ridiculed by virtually everyone in his day, as was Gallileo, Copernicus, and countless others. A lot of people thought christopher columbus was going to fall off the edge of the world.

You so called experts are just people who have read a lot of stories written by who knows some yesteryear and are trying to make something out of it. Acharya S has given a very rational and sound theory on how modern religion could be based on older astrological myths and I think it is the most reasonable explanation we have got. These other people you mention do not even bother to have an explanation and if they are trying to prove that the jesus story is true then I would say that makes them experts in deluding themselves.

I am not deluded because my mind is open to theories about where modern religious stories have come from and so far the astrotheology source is the best we have.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

10 Dec 2011, 8:46 am

Robdemanc wrote:
They are probably all closet christians or hindus or whatever. Or maybe they are just angry that someone else came up with this idea first.


Contrary to what you think, you're following a delusion, and it's this delusion that makes you and Acharya S and her fans say crap like the above.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

10 Dec 2011, 9:14 am

For every guy who was mocked during his time and turned out to be right all along. There are 1000 guys who were also mocked and were horribly wrong.


_________________
.


Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

10 Dec 2011, 9:26 am

MCalavera wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
They are probably all closet christians or hindus or whatever. Or maybe they are just angry that someone else came up with this idea first.


Contrary to what you think, you're following a delusion, and it's this delusion that makes you and Acharya S and her fans say crap like the above.


No, not a delusion, a speculation. And its a very reasonable speculation.



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

10 Dec 2011, 9:30 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
For every guy who was mocked during his time and turned out to be right all along. There are 1000 guys who were also mocked and were horribly wrong.


We will never prove it one way or the other anyway so what difference does it make. At this moment in my life I choose to place credibility in the astrotheology root of modern day religions because it is based on observable fact and is more than reasonable. Nobody will be able to trace the roots of belief systems like religion so all we have is our logical mind to speculate on what is the most reasonable assumption.