Page 2 of 4 [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Elmo82
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 3

25 Oct 2009, 5:56 pm

Thanks for the link Mud and Stars. Much appreciated :D

Sorry for any offense my post caused - it was inadvertent. Perhaps i could have titled/phrased the post more appropriately. :oops: Dent arthar Dent i shall continue to embace my self delusion, perhaps i'm just not of sufficent intellectual stature to cope with scientific reasoning :P but at the end of the day science does not equip you with peace, joy and reassurance it only generates more questions, so i'll take my chances.

Further, i didn't ask if there were other Christians floating around to segregate or show favour to Christians, merely to discuss having AS with someone singing from the same hymn sheet once in a while :D



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

25 Oct 2009, 6:02 pm

Elmo82 wrote:
Thanks for the link Mud and Stars. Much appreciated :D

Sorry for any offense my post caused - it was inadvertent. Perhaps i could have titled/phrased the post more appropriately. :oops: Dent arthar Dent i shall continue to embace my self delusion, perhaps i'm just not of sufficent intellectual stature to cope with scientific reasoning :P but at the end of the day science does not equip you with peace, joy and reassurance it only generates more questions, so i'll take my chances.

Further, i didn't ask if there were other Christians floating around to segregate or show favour to Christians, merely to discuss having AS with someone singing from the same hymn sheet once in a while :D


You weren't offensive....at least in my opinion.

I was kind of kidding around when I said that but yeah this place is more of a war zone than a religious meet-up lol.


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

25 Oct 2009, 7:25 pm

DentArthurDent wrote:
^ Yeah I know i was being bad but i just couldn't resist the jibe. Maybe i should restrain myself more but unfortunately the majority of religionists really give me the s**ts. There are a few on this forum who do have a good handle on reality and I respect those. The idea that WP should have a separate and critic free area for religion annoyed me. The whole idea that religion should be free from critical analysis is wrong, and to have a special little space on WP for religion just adds to that

It's not about religion being free from critical analysis. Sometimes people need a space to discuss and explore their faith (and this includes critical analysis and even challenging some aspects of a faith) without being shouted down by rabid atheists.

Such things are better done at a church than on the Internet, though. Wherever Christians organize on the net, it tends to be the crazy kind.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

25 Oct 2009, 8:14 pm

DentArthurDent wrote:
The idea that WP should have a separate and critic free area for religion annoyed me. The whole idea that religion should be free from critical analysis is wrong, and to have a special little space on WP for religion just adds to that

I think most people have a little space free from critical analysis, usually close to where they place their identity. For some people, this is their religion, and honestly, I don't think we can deny most groups this little space to some extent without being a jerk. The best we can do is just subject the ideas to critical analysis when they leave their special space.

And of course, Orwell's point is also valid.
Orwell wrote:
Sometimes people need a space to discuss and explore their faith (and this includes critical analysis and even challenging some aspects of a faith) without being shouted down by rabid atheists.

After all, a discussion on the trinity, or the atonement, or hell or so on does need some ability for there to be limited grounds to this discussion, rather than allowing for the entire premises to be overthrown. Otherwise, the exploration wouldn't get anywhere. The radical left has forums to do the exact same thing in privacy, where capitalists are kept into their little ghetto and leftists are given free reign of the forum to explore ideas.

The case for this seems stronger with religious ideas given that there are a lot of people with similar religious ideas(large numbers of Christians, and perhaps other groups) and religious ideas can truly be private more so than other ideas like political ideas can.

gbollard wrote:
I'd be happy for all religions to have a thread where they only talk positive about their religion and people who don't believe or don't agree simply don't bother posting there.

Sounds fair to me.

I also do agree that it would be nice for people of religion to have a place for discussion about their experiences and beliefs. The major issue is just that it is hard to enforce things like that. The moment a person has one opinion, the person who thinks the opposite is also likely to pop up and start yelling.... like DentArthurDent. :P

Orwell wrote:
Such things are better done at a church than on the Internet, though. Wherever Christians organize on the net, it tends to be the crazy kind.

Sort of true.



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

25 Oct 2009, 8:33 pm

What about me AG, how come I didn't get any credit?.... :(


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


gbollard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,009
Location: Sydney, Australia

25 Oct 2009, 8:40 pm

MissConstrue wrote:
What about me AG, how come I didn't get any credit?.... :(


What... with an avatar like yours bringing all these heathen images to a Christian Forum... black cat familiars, nasty orange vegatables and .... witches.... At least it's not that satanic "Potter" boy :P



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

25 Oct 2009, 9:01 pm

gbollard wrote:
MissConstrue wrote:
What about me AG, how come I didn't get any credit?.... :(


What... with an avatar like yours bringing all these heathen images to a Christian Forum... black cat familiars, nasty orange vegatables and .... witches.... At least it's not that satanic "Potter" boy :P


Sometimes I think christians could learn a thing or two from satan. You look at Harry Potter for instance, and see how much the witch behind it made $$$$. If it wasn't for Satan she'd still be in the poor house.... 8)


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

25 Oct 2009, 9:36 pm

MissConstrue wrote:
What about me AG, how come I didn't get any credit?.... :(

Look, if I start treating women as equals online, then I don't see how I can feel justified when I treat them unequally offline. And you know, somebody has gotta make me sandwiches and get paid 75 cents to my dollar, right? :P

I dunno, if you aren't excluding some group from being considered equally human, then it's not living, y'know? And I already made my peace with homosexuals, atheists, and brown people. :P



WhiskeyInTheJar
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 89

25 Oct 2009, 9:39 pm

gbollard wrote:
Keith wrote:
Isn't that deliberately segregating yourself into fixed crowds similar to race, gender, age, etc? That's how I see it


I think what is meant is ... that the person wants to talk "shop" (ie: Jesus) in a positive way. I see no reason why that would be exclusionism but it would probably be better worded that way in the title.

I'd be happy for all religions to have a thread where they only talk positive about their religion and people who don't believe or don't agree simply don't bother posting there.

Sounds fair to me.


The 'religion' for some here is atheism and secularism. This kind of replying by gbollard makes it clear why some prefer a site where you're not portrayed as a fool when you are christian (or have another religion).


_________________
"God is dead". Nietzsche
"Nietzsche is dead". God


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

25 Oct 2009, 9:54 pm

WhiskeyInTheJar wrote:
gbollard wrote:
Keith wrote:
Isn't that deliberately segregating yourself into fixed crowds similar to race, gender, age, etc? That's how I see it


I think what is meant is ... that the person wants to talk "shop" (ie: Jesus) in a positive way. I see no reason why that would be exclusionism but it would probably be better worded that way in the title.

I'd be happy for all religions to have a thread where they only talk positive about their religion and people who don't believe or don't agree simply don't bother posting there.

Sounds fair to me.


The 'religion' for some here is atheism and secularism. This kind of replying by gbollard makes it clear why some prefer a site where you're not portrayed as a fool when you are christian (or have another religion).

Ok, WhiskeyInTheJar, how would you have gbollard talk? I am just curious, as I didn't see how gbollard was being rude in this response. I hope you don't perceive me as rude when asking this.



WhiskeyInTheJar
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 89

25 Oct 2009, 10:04 pm

@awesomegl. Gbollard is sarcastic here, don't you see that?


_________________
"God is dead". Nietzsche
"Nietzsche is dead". God


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

25 Oct 2009, 10:23 pm

WhiskeyInTheJar wrote:
@awesomegl. Gbollard is sarcastic here, don't you see that?

No. I didn't see that. I mean, I know that he seems to alternate between joking and seriousness, but I saw nothing in the quoted section that seems to indicate a lack of seriousness in what was being say. Am I missing something?



gbollard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,009
Location: Sydney, Australia

25 Oct 2009, 10:45 pm

Actually I was being mildly serious there... lack of smiley faces indicates that.

I guess that what I'm saying is that suppose for instance that a group wanted to discuss;

"How the dinosaurs fit into creationist theory"

You could have a really cool and interesting discussion on that.

Sure, I know that many people (myself included) consider the earth to be a little older than the bible says but jumping in and saying that or throwing massive amounts of geological evidence doesn't help anyone - it just annoys people and detracts from a possibly interesting conversation.

I'm not suggesting that people shouldn't challenge religion. I firmly believe that they should.... but.... I also think that those who want to believe should be able to request an option to "believe peacefully" without being corrected or harrassed.

It's similar to the women's forum. I don't particularly like the idea that it's open to men because I feel embarrassed when I follow an RSS feed and end up there. (I don't believe that they should need a place of their own either) but that's beside the point. Sometimes, the OP on a thread specifically states that they only want female opinions - I think it's cool that we can sometimes respect that.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

25 Oct 2009, 11:01 pm

gbollard wrote:
Actually I was being mildly serious there... lack of smiley faces indicates that.

I thought so, and you were expressing a relatively serious idea too!

Quote:
I guess that what I'm saying is that suppose for instance that a group wanted to discuss;

"How the dinosaurs fit into creationist theory"

You could have a really cool and interesting discussion on that.

Sure, I know that many people (myself included) consider the earth to be a little older than the bible says but jumping in and saying that or throwing massive amounts of geological evidence doesn't help anyone - it just annoys people and detracts from a possibly interesting conversation.

I'm not suggesting that people shouldn't challenge religion. I firmly believe that they should.... but.... I also think that those who want to believe should be able to request an option to "believe peacefully" without being corrected or harrassed.

And we also basically agree on proper etiquette for these things as well.

Also, listen to this video starting at 2:34 and you will listen to something amazing! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3bdtlNUlx4



gbollard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,009
Location: Sydney, Australia

25 Oct 2009, 11:24 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Also, listen to this video starting at 2:34 and you will listen to something amazing! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3bdtlNUlx4


Wow...

Now that's a cool song... up there with many of Monty Python's ones.



DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

26 Oct 2009, 2:23 am

Orwell wrote:
It's not about religion being free from critical analysis. Sometimes people need a space to discuss and explore their faith (and this includes critical analysis and even challenging some aspects of a faith) without being shouted down by rabid atheists.

Such things are better done at a church than on the Internet, though. Wherever Christians organize on the net, it tends to be the crazy kind.


Thats fine, but to think that it is OK for a religionists to request there own space on WP speaks volumes of the attitude of many 'believers' that religion should be beyond critique. I have know problem with Christian groups setting up their own sites with their own rules etc but WP whilst privately owned is still very much a diverse and public site.

What next, start enforcing and strengthening blasphemy laws, ooops too late!! ! its already happened in Ireland


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx