Hanotaux wrote:
Quote:
Nothing. Just another uninspired, mediocre artist. He couldn't even keep up in art school! That takes a serious lack of imagination...I mean you gotta suck real hard to get booted out of art school.
Actually, he was never even accepted. He failed 2 entrance exams because he could not draw nude figures. It doesn't mean he had no talent but that he couldn't do one specific thing that just happened to be a prereq. Lots of other painters did things like omit painting hands in portraits as they had a hard time painting hands.
He may have done better in architecture or theatre-design, and those were the fields he was reccommended to pursue. His possible instructors told him he had more specific talent but that his future just wasn't with portraits.
I don't see how that makes him a crappy artist because he couldn't draw people. Who cares if he only did buildings and landscapes?
I'd rather look at Hitler's pictures than the "music" we get today with a bunch of screaming punks dressed in rakish clown outfits jumping and screaming all over the place.
How about one sitting down and playing acoustic guitar and telling stories from the bad old days?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiWoHTIjExA
Edit: I will say he had good taste in music. Wagner kicked ass.
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson