Satan is fighting for what is right against a tyrant (God)

Page 2 of 5 [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

17 Nov 2010, 10:56 am

Ambrose_Rotten wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
Yeah I think so too. What is your take on the great flood then? To me that has got to be some local flood that ruined some tribe somewhere and the survivors spread their story and it became embellished etc. I heard that the black sea only filled up about 10,000 years ago and that before then the whole area was full of Turkish farmers.

It probably does have to be some local flood or something else like that.


They found documentation that the Euphrates river flooded, and a lot of people were killed, but one guy managed to hijack a boat with a bunch of farm animals on it.


That must have been one hell of a farming system with all those strange animals on the boat.



NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

17 Nov 2010, 9:10 pm

We can't really assume the ancient Israelites who wrote the Old Testament conceptualized Yahweh and Satan the way a modern Christian theologian or philosopher might. The theologian or philosopher might posit certain properties they think belong to their monotheistic god, but the god of the Old Testament is clearly a folk god along the lines of a Zeus or other god in a polytheistic pantheon. The concept of a cosmic battle between the Christian god and Lucifer is Manichean rather than the Old Testament's concept of a tempter angel Satan. The Bible and Christian mythology is multi-sourced and a product of an evolving culture.



Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

17 Nov 2010, 9:31 pm

Ambrose_Rotten wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
Yeah I think so too. What is your take on the great flood then? To me that has got to be some local flood that ruined some tribe somewhere and the survivors spread their story and it became embellished etc. I heard that the black sea only filled up about 10,000 years ago and that before then the whole area was full of Turkish farmers.

It probably does have to be some local flood or something else like that.


They found documentation that the Euphrates river flooded, and a lot of people were killed, but one guy managed to hijack a boat with a bunch of farm animals on it.


Documentation!, how about the Cretaceous period with a layer of chalk being left over much of the Earths surface due to it being under water, all the fossils of marine life found in the deserts of America, all cultures of the world having flood legends, not just the Christians, how about the Chinese picture word for ship being 8 men in a boat, just like the 8 people that where aboard the ark, how about the recordings of the Roman historian Josephus who records the popularity of lucky amulets carved from the wood of Noahs ark!

Or how about the instant freezing of heards of woolly mamoths, one minute they whre eating fresh grass and plums, the next they are dead and frozen before thier flesh even started to decompose, only the quick removel of the water mantle that surrounded the planet as revealed in Genisis chapter 1 ccould account for that.
Or the remains of tropical rainforests under the polar ice caps.
Or the salamander that was found under the polar ice and that revived for a while once thawed.
The canapy of water around the globe would have acted as a greenhouse keeping the whole planet at an ideal temperature, and protecting life from the harmfull effects of solar radiation, its no co-incidence that people lived for 900 years before the flood, then after the waters of the canopy collapsed on the earth, causing the flood, people then lived the same as they do now.

Or what about the bones of predators and thier prey being found heaped together in high mountain caves as if fleeing rising water.



ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

17 Nov 2010, 10:03 pm

@Ambrose Rotten, @Nambo, Sources please.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

18 Nov 2010, 12:09 am

NeantHumain wrote:
We can't really assume the ancient Israelites who wrote the Old Testament conceptualized Yahweh and Satan the way a modern Christian theologian or philosopher might. The theologian or philosopher might posit certain properties they think belong to their monotheistic god, but the god of the Old Testament is clearly a folk god along the lines of a Zeus or other god in a polytheistic pantheon. The concept of a cosmic battle between the Christian god and Lucifer is Manichean rather than the Old Testament's concept of a tempter angel Satan. The Bible and Christian mythology is multi-sourced and a product of an evolving culture.

Oh whatever. Quit bringing the truth to my pack of lies. You ruin the fun of it all. :roll: :P



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

18 Nov 2010, 1:00 am

"god" gave free will "the devil" encourages it to be used. :roll:


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


Squirrelrat
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 448

18 Nov 2010, 1:48 am

Hail Satan! :twisted:



91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

18 Nov 2010, 3:01 am

So what are you arguing. Don't believe in God because Satan does not like God anyway? I do not see what is to be gained in this discussion.


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

18 Nov 2010, 3:05 am

ikorack wrote:
@Ambrose Rotten, @Nambo, Sources please.


I am guessing http://creation.com/study-guide-main-list :roll:


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

18 Nov 2010, 7:56 am

91 wrote:
So what are you arguing. Don't believe in God because Satan does not like God anyway? I do not see what is to be gained in this discussion.

Actually, I am arguing that the narrative of the Bible does not make sense in terms of Satan's rebellion. In this, I have made the argument that a different interpretation of scripture, one incompatible with the Christian faith, is perhaps better. I make the latter argument partially as a joke though.



Nambo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,882
Location: Prussia

18 Nov 2010, 7:03 pm

DentArthurDent wrote:
ikorack wrote:
@Ambrose Rotten, @Nambo, Sources please.


I am guessing http://creation.com/study-guide-main-list :roll:


Sources?, Well theres Genisis 1 and 2nd Peter 3 for references to the Water canopy.

Josephus History of the Jews can still be bought on Amazon or maybe your local library has it.

All the other stuff you willhave to search for, Iam afraid I learnt all this long before the internet was invented, and not from Christian books either, my childhood special interest was anything to do with nature, natural history, dinosaurs, the Ice age, Geology, I had books, I borrowed books from the library, all on these subjects and from a scientific not religious point of view, dont ask me to remember what these books where called, so very long agao.



tangomike
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 675

19 Nov 2010, 2:25 am

I have thought about this for quite sometime. Originally I thought what you think, that Satan is actually doing the right thing by liberating man from gods tight leash...but I eventually came to the conclusion that God is like your Father (literally), humans are his children and Satan is the "cool uncle" who gives you beer, pot and lets you do whatever you want to do.

Sure you'd love to try and get drunk, high and stay out late, its only natural to want to do what your told not to....but in the long run we all know neither alcohol or pot are actually good things which is why your Father tells you not to do either in the first place.

God's tyranny = tough love.



waltur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 924
Location: california

19 Nov 2010, 2:04 pm

tangomike wrote:
I have thought about this for quite sometime. Originally I thought what you think, that Satan is actually doing the right thing by liberating man from gods tight leash...but I eventually came to the conclusion that God is like your Father (literally), humans are his children and Satan is the "cool uncle" who gives you beer, pot and lets you do whatever you want to do.

Sure you'd love to try and get drunk, high and stay out late, its only natural to want to do what your told not to....but in the long run we all know neither alcohol or pot are actually good things which is why your Father tells you not to do either in the first place.

God's tyranny = tough love.



as a father figure, i think the god of the bible should be considered about as good of a father as bradley dayley. (google him yourself)


_________________
Waltur the Walrus Slayer,
Militant Asantist.
"BLASPHEMER!! !! !! !!" (according to AngelRho)


Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,677
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

19 Nov 2010, 3:17 pm

Nambo wrote:
Sources?, Well theres Genisis 1 and 2nd Peter 3 for references to the Water canopy.


The bible is not a reliable source of factual information. Most geological, cosmological, astronomical, biological and palaeontological evidence contradicts a literal interpretation of genesis.

Nambo wrote:
Documentation!, how about the Cretaceous period with a layer of chalk being left over much of the Earths surface due to it being under water, all the fossils of marine life found in the deserts of America, all cultures of the world having flood legends, not just the Christians, how about the Chinese picture word for ship being 8 men in a boat, just like the 8 people that where aboard the ark, how about the recordings of the Roman historian Josephus who records the popularity of lucky amulets carved from the wood of Noahs ark!

Or how about the instant freezing of heards of woolly mamoths, one minute they whre eating fresh grass and plums, the next they are dead and frozen before thier flesh even started to decompose, only the quick removel of the water mantle that surrounded the planet as revealed in Genisis chapter 1 ccould account for that.
Or the remains of tropical rainforests under the polar ice caps.
Or the salamander that was found under the polar ice and that revived for a while once thawed.
The canapy of water around the globe would have acted as a greenhouse keeping the whole planet at an ideal temperature, and protecting life from the harmfull effects of solar radiation, its no co-incidence that people lived for 900 years before the flood, then after the waters of the canopy collapsed on the earth, causing the flood, people then lived the same as they do now.

Or what about the bones of predators and thier prey being found heaped together in high mountain caves as if fleeing rising water.


None of the above is evidence that Noah's flood actually happened and was a global flood. All those things have valid alternative explanations consistent with our current scientific theories. You might want to take a look at the following site for those explanations:

http://www.talkorigins.org/



Subotai
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,036
Location: 日本

19 Nov 2010, 7:10 pm

In some Gnostic sects the Jewish/Christian god is seen as the Demiurge. The flawed evil entity that created the physical plane.

Lucifer= Light bearer. The snake offers the date/apple/pomegranate of knowledge to mankind. The snake is a symbol of knowledge and wisdom to many cultures.

Christianity was forced down people's throats for centuries and demonized every other religion (or incorporated them for easier assimilation)
The Christ salvation myth is based off the Roman mystery cults which are based off the Greek mystery cults which are based off older cults.



Subotai
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,036
Location: 日本

19 Nov 2010, 7:20 pm

NeantHumain wrote:
We can't really assume the ancient Israelites who wrote the Old Testament conceptualized Yahweh and Satan the way a modern Christian theologian or philosopher might. The theologian or philosopher might posit certain properties they think belong to their monotheistic god, but the god of the Old Testament is clearly a folk god along the lines of a Zeus or other god in a polytheistic pantheon. The concept of a cosmic battle between the Christian god and Lucifer is Manichean rather than the Old Testament's concept of a tempter angel Satan. The Bible and Christian mythology is multi-sourced and a product of an evolving culture.


So true. Modern Christianity isn't the same as ancient Judaism, nor is it the same as pre-Roman Christianity, nor is it the same as early Roman Catholicism, nor is it the same as medieval Roman Catholicism... ETCETERA! :roll: