Gay marriages and civil partnerships in church
Oh yes, you can be sure of that ...
Office of the Press Secretary, September 20, 2001
Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People
United States Capitol, Washington, D.C., 9:00 P.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT:
... Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make: Either you are with us* [who believe in progress and pluralism, tolerance and freedom], or you are with the terrorists. (Applause.)
... This is not, however, just America's fight. And what is at stake is not just America's freedom. This is the world's fight. This is civilization's fight. This is the fight of *all who believe in progress and pluralism, tolerance and freedom.
Once that is in place, people like me will have been eradicated if not conformed or already dead.
We'll probably both be dead.
_________________
'Ave we had a national f**king stroke!??
Well, if you want to deny them a 'Christian' marriage, that's your 'right' I suppose. But who says marriage is a religious ceremony? We live in a secular society. Unless you specifically seek out a gay couple that gets married I doubt it will ever have any effect on your life, so why even care?
I probably shouldn't care, I know. Its just another group pushing for equality, when they've already got it here.
I wouldn't say there is perfect equality for them. Nobody is really 'equal'. Rather, some people are 'more equal' then others...
Yeah. But these gay rights groups will never stop.
_________________
'Ave we had a national f**king stroke!??
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
Gay marriage is not legal in every state so they are not yet equal. You cannot justify asking them to stop based on that. Also no one is suggesting to make a church marry anyone that would be asinine, they are suggesting allowing the option for the churches who are not opposed to such things as well as allowing them to have legally recognized marriage.
I'm not just talking about America. Obviously some of the states in America, gay people don't have enough rights. But in England they do. People here who are complaining about gay rights and women's rights, their sexuality or gender obviously defines them. They should just get on with their lives.
_________________
'Ave we had a national f**king stroke!??
I'm not just talking about America. Obviously some of the states in America, gay people don't have enough rights. But in England they do. People here who are complaining about gay rights and women's rights, their sexuality or gender obviously defines them. They should just get on with their lives.
Are you English? From what I hear the whole place is going to sh|t. But I do not know if or how such issues would factor into that, I doubt they would at all.
I'm not just talking about America. Obviously some of the states in America, gay people don't have enough rights. But in England they do. People here who are complaining about gay rights and women's rights, their sexuality or gender obviously defines them. They should just get on with their lives.
Are you English? From what I hear the whole place is going to sh|t. But I do not know if or how such issues would factor into that, I doubt they would at all.
Yes. It went to sh!t a long time ago. Well with all the women's rights bull, you'll get women getting 10 times as much in compensation, for a guy slapping their butt at work, as a murder victim's family would get. Stuff like that doesn't help.
_________________
'Ave we had a national f**king stroke!??
You appear to be labouring under a fundamental misconception. Christianity does not take a single, uniform position on homosexuality. Many individual denomination do not have a single uniform position on homosexuality--the Anglican communion includes dioceses in which blessings of same sex unions were permitted prior to legalization of same sex marriages, and dioceses in which homosexual conduct of any kind is considered anathema.
Let's consider the analagous issue of remarriage of a divorced person. Such a marriage is perfectly legal, with the possible exceptions of marriages or remarriages celebrated in Malta, Philippines, the Vatican or Eire (for divorces granted before 1995). But, the position of many churches (e.g. the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church) is clear--no person with a living spouse may remarry in the church. Why were the perfectly legal remarriages of the Prince of Wales and the Princess Royal conducted in a registry office and the Church of Scotland, respectively? Because no legal compulsion can properly be brought to bear compelling a religious institution (in this case, the Church of England) to perform a marriage that is contrary to that religion's teachings.
But there is absolutely nothing to invalidate a marriage between previously married people in a church which allows for such marriages (q.v. the remarriage of the Princess Royal.)
The same is properly true of same sex marriages. Different denominations have different approaches.
Some have a blanket approval: the United Church of Christ, the Metropolitan Community Church and the Society of Friends (the Quakers) are all examples of these.
Some allow individual diocese, parishes or congregations to address the question: the United Church of Canada, the Anglican Church of Canada, the Episcopal Church, and the Evangelical Lutheran Church all provide for such an approach. (As do the Reconstruction, Reform and Conservative movements in Judaism--but the dicussion seems limited to Churches).
The question is somewhat moot in jurisdicitions in which same sex couples are prohibited from legally marrying. But even in these jurisdictions, some churches have been unequivocal in their support: the Church of Sweden and the Church of Scotland are two prime examples.
So the answer to the question of whether a same sex couple should be permitted to marry in a church can only be answered by the proper authority of that church, and not by you, by me, by Parliament or by the Courts.
_________________
--James
Many churches in the US gladly marry same sex couples. Many do not. I have no issue with this. Churches have the right to refuse to marry any couple they do not wish to marry.
_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.
Visagrunt, there's too many religions within religions.
I don't think any church should be made to change their poilicies cause of pressure from gay rights groups or Elton John. If a certain church does allow gay people to get married, then I guess thats up to them yeah. But again, there's too many religions within religions. I'm sure if there was a God, it'd be pretty simple.
_________________
'Ave we had a national f**king stroke!??
leejosepho
Veteran
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock
What makes you think he might even want anything to do with most churches, eh?!
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================
I don't think any church should be made to change their poilicies cause of pressure from gay rights groups or Elton John. If a certain church does allow gay people to get married, then I guess thats up to them yeah. But again, there's too many religions within religions. I'm sure if there was a God, it'd be pretty simple.
I don't believe the government should have the power to force anything on churches as long as they aren't harming people.
Not marrying a same sex couple in a church where it's legal for that same couple to get a non-religious marriages doesn't hurt anyone.
_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.
I don't think any church should be made to change their poilicies cause of pressure from gay rights groups or Elton John. If a certain church does allow gay people to get married, then I guess thats up to them yeah. But again, there's too many religions within religions. I'm sure if there was a God, it'd be pretty simple.
I don't believe the government should have the power to force anything on churches as long as they aren't harming people.
Not marrying a same sex couple in a church where it's legal for that same couple to get a non-religious marriages doesn't hurt anyone.
Agreed.
I thought the idea was, marriage made people miserable, not gay people married.
_________________
'Ave we had a national f**king stroke!??
Well, if you want to deny them a 'Christian' marriage, that's your 'right' I suppose. But who says marriage is a religious ceremony? We live in a secular society. Unless you specifically seek out a gay couple that gets married I doubt it will ever have any effect on your life, so why even care?
I probably shouldn't care, I know. Its just another group pushing for equality, when they've already got it here.
I wouldn't say there is perfect equality for them. Nobody is really 'equal'. Rather, some people are 'more equal' then others...
Yeah. But these gay rights groups will never stop.
UNTIL EVERYONE IS GAY!! ! BWAHAHAHAHA!! !
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]
