04 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
Vigilans wrote:
Np m8 its not like you would be the one to hijack it 
I did mention abortion earlier in the thread so I guess I can't complain
But yeah, when I think 'bioethics' in general; Key terms: Slippery Slopes, Superstition and Rampant Speculation somehow treated as Fact
I did mention abortion earlier in the thread so I guess I can't complainBut yeah, when I think 'bioethics' in general; Key terms: Slippery Slopes, Superstition and Rampant Speculation somehow treated as Fact
I don't know. I kind of hijacked the other thread you were talking to me (EDIT: I think there were at least 2 more as well) on. I don't try to do that, but I am very talkative on message boards.
EDIT: Yeah, actually it was your quote that caused me to publish it. I was vacillating but realized it was in context based on what you said.
Last edited by HerrGrimm on 04 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
04 Apr 2011, 12:15 pm
HerrGrimm wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Np m8 its not like you would be the one to hijack it I did mention abortion earlier in the thread so I guess I can't complain
But yeah, when I think 'bioethics' in general; Key terms: Slippery Slopes, Superstition and Rampant Speculation somehow treated as Fact
I did mention abortion earlier in the thread so I guess I can't complainBut yeah, when I think 'bioethics' in general; Key terms: Slippery Slopes, Superstition and Rampant Speculation somehow treated as Fact
I don't know. I kind of hijacked the other thread you were talking to me on. I don't try to do that, but I am very talkative on message boards.
I wouldn't worry too much about it. This is the PPR
. There was a thread not too long ago suggesting PPR discussions should be closed after 5 pages, as they almost invariably end up going off topic
