Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

pree10shun
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 May 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,659
Location: Everywhere

28 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm

metaphysics wrote:
They should be hard to understand to common people. I detest shallow, vulgar, trifling things( A perfect example of these, Jane Austen).


Just because you don't understand the depth in Jane Austen does not mean it is shallow! :x



metaphysics
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 809
Location: Everywhere

28 Jun 2011, 2:51 pm

pree10shun wrote:
metaphysics wrote:
They should be hard to understand to common people. I detest shallow, vulgar, trifling things( A perfect example of these, Jane Austen).


Just because you don't understand the depth in Jane Austen does not mean it is shallow! :x


OK. Please tell me where is the depth in her?

Are you British?? As what you told me before? :P Then I can understand that your opinion may based on your patriotic heart...

If the' truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife..." is deep enough in your opinion, then what can be shallow?

I am so curious...



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 83
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

28 Jun 2011, 3:00 pm

Much of the value [depth depends on where YOU are] in Jane Austen and others like her lies in her often accurate and occasionally friendly observations on how different types of people interact.

She is not dealing with deep feeling or with vast philosophical issues, but there is some depth in humans and their interactions.

It will be very interesting to see how you find Ulysses - what you hear.



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

28 Jun 2011, 3:27 pm

I like Stephen King.
I know his books aren't considered "literature", but I usually read novels to relax.

As James Joyce has been mentioned, I will add that I did enjoy "Dubliners".



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

28 Jun 2011, 3:27 pm

Philologos wrote:
metaphysics -



Metaphysics? Isn't that Greek for sh*t?

ruveyn



blunnet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,053

28 Jun 2011, 4:12 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Philologos wrote:
metaphysics -



Metaphysics? Isn't that Greek for sh*t?

ruveyn

Pretty much.

But I think Philologos was refering to the user named metaphysics rather than actual metaphysics.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

28 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Philologos wrote:
metaphysics -



Metaphysics? Isn't that Greek for sh*t?

ruveyn


no I think the word is σκατά (skatá)
as in the phrase that is very popular in Greece these days
τρώνε φασιστική σκατά.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


RedHanrahan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Sep 2007
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,204
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand

28 Jun 2011, 4:48 pm

Are Novels worth reading?

A friend I had once [and greatly respected the mind of] told me that to know the idea of a culture one needed to read their history, philosophy etc but if one wanted to understand the soul of a culture one needed to imerse oneself in thier art.

I read a mix of fiction and non fiction for this very reason, literature [I will choose to expand the term 'novels' to include shorter fiction but exclude narrative driven 'genre' fiction by shifting to this definition] are indeed worth reading.

I find/have found as an aspie that my understanding of the human condition has been greatly expanded through the study of humans through good literature. I choose articulate character driven rather than narrative driven stories generally for this reason.

@ metaphysics, I find it amusing that you have dived into Joyce at his most self indulgent, the above mentioned friend dismissed Ulysses as the least finished 'classic' of Irish literature, I myself never finished it nor Finnegans Wake and know very few people who have and if I recall correctly they all finished it under accademic duress :lol:

Dubliners does indeed include a couple of good stories but I find Joyce altogether too self indulgent, George Moore is to my mind the far better writer of the two and his insights are more rewarding.

Literature in the form of the short story is by far my favourite diversion, Chekov, Tolstoy, O'Faolain, O'Connor, Bowden, Lavin all masters/mistress' of the form and this is to just name the obvious. Annie Proulx, 'Postcards', 'Heartsongs and other stories' and 'Accordian Crimes' are masterfull works, Ron Rash's short fiction is understated genius. As for my own compatriots Kiwi writers have long mastered the short story and the Oxford collections give an excellent survey of the last century or so.

peace j


_________________
Just because we can does not mean we should.

What vision is left? And is anyone asking?

Have a great day!