Quote:
Really. I have managed to live without my foreskin for my whole life minus 8 days. I have four children of the flesh and 5 grandchildren. Orthodox Jews (which I am not) manage to raise entire football teams of children without a foreskin. So what are they missing?
Not gonna say something ridiculous like "can't really call it living without uncircumcised sex"
But there is a problem with this debate, the vast majority of circumcised men really don't know what they are missing (if anything), likewise neither do the majority of uncircumcised guys know what they would be missing(if anything).
However, knowing that the foreskin contains lots of nerve endings, has a mechanical role in sex, and the glans loses sensitivity over the years if it's uncovered, it's not a huge leap to say that sex is better for uncircumcised men.
I'm not willing to get it done myself and see what's what tbh. I've read a few before and after stories of late life circumcisions, they were all for medical reasons like phimosis, of course circumcision is going to improve their sex lives - there was something wrong in the first place. The case studies also tend to be done relatively soon after the procedure, according to that last account, it can take decades for a circumcised man to lose all sensation. All these arguments aside, there is still no good reason to inflict it on infants.
Any *ahem* experienced women able to comment on the difference? Oh and don't mention looks, looks is also not a valid reason for circumcision.
_________________
Crom is a grim, gloomy and unforgiving god, ever watching from atop his mountain in dark clouds and obscuring mists, ready to pass disapproving judgment on any and all. But he is said to value courage and tenacity in mortals, even if they ultimately fail.