Page 2 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

kxmode
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,613
Location: In your neighborhood, knocking on your door. :)

23 Dec 2011, 12:27 am

Thank you for sharing that Artrat. Can you source those statements? I'd like to read The Vatican's official response.

P.S. As a side note The Vatican is a part of Hinduism as Hinduism is part of paganism. They are all flavors of the same type, all spawned from a single source: Babylonia.



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

23 Dec 2011, 12:33 am

artrat wrote:
The film used the iconography of Hinduism. The Vatican hated this film. They were worried that it promoted pantheism,paganism, and nature worship.


Alternative view:

Luke Muehlhauser wrote:
Which is not to say that Avatar is one of the best movies of the decade or anything like that. The story follows all the usual screenwriting rules, and is therefore predictable. The dialogue isn’t annoying, but it isn’t smart either. And there are lots of scientific and tactical absurdities, such as the pointless military decision to deploy ground troops to be picked off by the Na’vi while missile-launching airships do all the work.

But here’s the thing. Avatar is a classic action-adventure movie. Its purpose is not to revolutionize storytelling or mise-en-scene or montage or chronology. Its purpose is to tell an exciting, emotional, moral story that we connect to as humans. And frankly, Avatar does that better than any other film I can think of. For example, let’s consider four elements crucial to the action-adventure genre: pacing, visuals, excitement, and moral message. I think a strong case could be made that Avatar does all of these better than Raiders of the Lost Ark. Better than Star Wars. Better than any similar movie you can think of. Better even than The Matrix. Frankly, as a straight-up action-adventure movie, Avatar might be the best action-adventure of all time.

And I’m probably not alone in thinking so, now that it’s the highest-grossing film of all time (though not when adjusted for inflation, or counted by tickets sold).

Whether or not you enjoy Avatar as much as I do, you may be wondering how I can call it an ‘atheist film‘. After all, the heroes of the movie, the Na’vi, are deeply religious. They practice an earth-based religion (well, Pandora-based religion) and claim to have a spiritual connection to almost every living thing on the planet – even over great distances.

The key to unlocking Avatar‘s atheistic heart is an exchange between Avatar‘s godless scientist hero, Dr. Grace Augustine, and the corporate administrator in charge of stripping Pandora of its natural resources, Parker:

Quote:
GRACE: Those trees were sacred to the Na’vi in a way you can’t imagine.

PARKER: You know what? You throw a stick in the air around here and it’s gonna land on some sacred fern for Christ’s sake.

GRACE: I’m not talking about some kind of pagan voodoo here, I’m talking about something real. Something measurable in the biology of the forest.

PARKER: Which is what, exactly?

GRACE: There is some kind of electrochemical communication between the roots of the trees, like the synapses between neurons. And each tree has 104 connections to the trees around it. And there are 1012 trees on Pandora. It’s more connections than the human brain. Get it? It’s a network. It’s a global network, and the Na’vi can access it… at sites like the one you just destroyed.


Avatar‘s slam against religion is this: it shows us what religions would be like if they were real.

The point is that human religions are not based on anything real like the religion of the Na’vi is. Human religions are voodoo BS, because there’s nothing real behind them.

The heroes of Avatar are not superstitious primitives. They are a species that lives on a planet with genuine connections they have evolved to participate in. They are smart enough to have given up war with their neighboring tribes, and they are smart enough to respect the interdependency of living things on their planet.

Another point in favor of my interpretation? James Cameron is, of course, an atheist – and one who thinks agnosticism is ‘cowardly atheism.’


http://commonsenseatheism.com/?p=6947


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


kxmode
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,613
Location: In your neighborhood, knocking on your door. :)

23 Dec 2011, 12:44 am

@Master_Pedant - I am simply showing what I thought to be similarities between the film and the Hindu religion. Every thread I start ends up turning into a theism vs atheism debate. This is PPR. The "R" means Religion. Yes, that means we are discussing religion... not atheism. If you want to start another theism vs atheism thread, start one. You can seed it using your comment above! But please don't hijack my threads anymore. I think it's really disrespectful to keep doing this. This message goes to all of you PPR regulars that keep doing this.

I also call on all PPR Moderators to please ask those who are constantly hijacking thread topics to stop it. It's not fair.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

23 Dec 2011, 1:22 am

kxmode wrote:
@Master_Pedant - I am simply showing what I thought to be similarities between the film and the Hindu religion. Every thread I start ends up turning into a theism vs atheism debate. This is PPR. The "R" means Religion. Yes, that means we are discussing religion... not atheism. If you want to start another theism vs atheism thread, start one. You can seed it using your comment above! But please don't hijack my threads anymore. I think it's really disrespectful to keep doing this. This message goes to all of you PPR regulars that keep doing this.

I also call on all PPR Moderators to please ask those who are constantly hijacking thread topics to stop it. It's not fair.


How is it not fair? You don't own this place and you don't own what other people rationally think.



Tadzio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 877

23 Dec 2011, 1:31 am

kxmode wrote:
@Master_Pedant - I am simply showing what I thought to be similarities between the film and the Hindu religion. Every thread I start ends up turning into a theism vs atheism debate. This is PPR. The "R" means Religion. Yes, that means we are discussing religion... not atheism. If you want to start another theism vs atheism thread, start one. You can seed it using your comment above! But please don't hijack my threads anymore. I think it's really disrespectful to keep doing this. This message goes to all of you PPR regulars that keep doing this.

I also call on all PPR Moderators to please ask those who are constantly hijacking thread topics to stop it. It's not fair.


Hi kxmode,

In the mid 1960's, the Jehovah Witnesses attempted to convince me that pantheism and Hinduism (and much else) were simply different forms of atheism. I tried to find the booklet they used then, as so much is on the internet now, but a simple search of books-dot-google for "atheism is pantheism" returns many books with much the same reasonings.

Under other circumstances, in studying the science of human behaviour, I had class lectures warning to separate pseudo-philosophical concepts tainted with quasi-religious notions from the "hard-sciences", as the notion of "Human Nature" has more of a religious basis in philosophy than any of science (I also had religious lectures teaching that the concept of "Human Nature" was Satan trying another door).

The TV commercials for "Mars Bar" candy bars were held as "wrong" also, since Jehovah created life only on his chosen "planet".

Tadzio



kxmode
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,613
Location: In your neighborhood, knocking on your door. :)

23 Dec 2011, 1:37 am

MCalavera wrote:
How is it not fair? You don't own this place and you don't own what other people rationally think.


I don't own WrongPlanet.net, but I did start the topic therefore I own it. I'm not saying people can't rationally think whatever they want. I am kindly asking PPR regulars to finally stop their thread hijackings. Stop it. Okay? I don't do it in your threads. I kindly ask you not do it in mine.


_________________
A Proud Witness of Jehovah God (JW.org)
Revelation 21:4 "And [God] will wipe out every tear from their eyes,
and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore.
The former things have passed away."


kxmode
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,613
Location: In your neighborhood, knocking on your door. :)

23 Dec 2011, 1:46 am

Tadzio wrote:
Hi kxmode,

In the mid 1960's, the Jehovah Witnesses attempted to convince me that pantheism and Hinduism (and much else) were simply different forms of atheism. I tried to find the booklet they used then, as so much is on the internet now, but a simple search of books-dot-google for "atheism is pantheism" returns many books with much the same reasonings.

Under other circumstances, in studying the science of human behaviour, I had class lectures warning to separate pseudo-philosophical concepts tainted with quasi-religious notions from the "hard-sciences", as the notion of "Human Nature" has more of a religious basis in philosophy than any of science (I also had religious lectures teaching that the concept of "Human Nature" was Satan trying another door).

The TV commercials for "Mars Bar" candy bars were held as "wrong" also, since Jehovah created life only on his chosen "planet".


See. This is precisely what I'm talking about. This has NOTHING to do with the topic. Stop posting these comments. If you want to ask me stuff like this do it via a private message or start a new thread.

Most of you are intelligent. I KNOW you know when a comment is on topic and when it is off topic. I am simply asking that if you post a comment please keep it on topic. That's all I'm asking... wow. It's like sitting in a lecture hall where the topic of the class changes every 3 minutes. 8O



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

23 Dec 2011, 2:04 am

kxmode wrote:
Tadzio wrote:
Hi kxmode,

In the mid 1960's, the Jehovah Witnesses attempted to convince me that pantheism and Hinduism (and much else) were simply different forms of atheism. I tried to find the booklet they used then, as so much is on the internet now, but a simple search of books-dot-google for "atheism is pantheism" returns many books with much the same reasonings.

Under other circumstances, in studying the science of human behaviour, I had class lectures warning to separate pseudo-philosophical concepts tainted with quasi-religious notions from the "hard-sciences", as the notion of "Human Nature" has more of a religious basis in philosophy than any of science (I also had religious lectures teaching that the concept of "Human Nature" was Satan trying another door).

The TV commercials for "Mars Bar" candy bars were held as "wrong" also, since Jehovah created life only on his chosen "planet".


See. This is precisely what I'm talking about. This has NOTHING to do with the topic. Stop posting these comments. If you want to ask me stuff like this do it via a private message or start a new thread.

Most of you are intelligent. I KNOW you know when a comment is on topic and when it is off topic. I am simply asking that if you post a comment please keep it on topic. That's all I'm asking... wow. It's like sitting in a lecture hall where the topic of the class changes every 3 minutes. 8O


That's the thing. It isn't a lecture hall here.



Tadzio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 877

23 Dec 2011, 2:10 am

kxmode wrote:
I'm going to go out on a limb and say Avatar has its roots in Hinduism.


kxmode wrote:
Thank you for sharing that Artrat. Can you source those statements? I'd like to read The Vatican's official response.

P.S. As a side note The Vatican is a part of Hinduism as Hinduism is part of paganism. They are all flavors of the same type, all spawned from a single source: Babylonia.


kxmode wrote:
"Not merely Egyptians, Chaldeans, Phoenicians, Greeks and Romans, but also the Hindus, the Buddhists of China and of Thibet, the Goths, Anglo-Saxons, Druids, Mexicans and Peruvians, the Aborigines of Australia, and even the savages of the South Sea Islands, must have all derived their religious ideas from a common source and a common centre. Everywhere we find the most startling coincidences in rites, ceremonies, customs, traditions, and in the names and relations of their respective gods and goddesses."


kxmode wrote:
Tadzio wrote:
Hi kxmode,

In the mid 1960's, the Jehovah Witnesses attempted to convince me that pantheism and Hinduism (and much else) were simply different forms of atheism. I tried to find the booklet they used then, as so much is on the internet now, but a simple search of books-dot-google for "atheism is pantheism" returns many books with much the same reasonings.

Under other circumstances, in studying the science of human behaviour, I had class lectures warning to separate pseudo-philosophical concepts tainted with quasi-religious notions from the "hard-sciences", as the notion of "Human Nature" has more of a religious basis in philosophy than any of science (I also had religious lectures teaching that the concept of "Human Nature" was Satan trying another door).

The TV commercials for "Mars Bar" candy bars were held as "wrong" also, since Jehovah created life only on his chosen "planet".


See. This is precisely what I'm talking about. This has NOTHING to do with the topic. Stop posting these comments. If you want to ask me stuff like this do it via a private message or start a new thread.

Most of you are intelligent. I KNOW you know when a comment is on topic and when it is off topic. I am simply asking that if you post a comment please keep it on topic. That's all I'm asking... wow. It's like sitting in a lecture hall where the topic of the class changes every 3 minutes. 8O


"Roots in Hinduism" and "The Vatican is a part of Hinduism as Hinduism is part of paganism", with "Avatar" as a work of S.F. and "'Mars Bars' being S.F. and Life on other astronomical bodies", is OFF TOPIC of "Avatar", "Hinduism", "Catholicism", and "S.F.".

It may well be impossible to "stay on topic" to your weighted interpretations of inspirations of S.F. "movies".

Tadzio

P.S.: "Hinduism For Dummies" - Page 82

Consumer Dummies, Srinivasan - 2011 - 384 pages - Google eBook - Preview
"Conceiving the whole universe as God In Hinduism, God is All and All is God. This belief does not exclude or deny anything. Some people confuse pantheism with atheism, but as you can see, Hindu pantheism is not atheistic. ..."

I thought most people were confused in the 1960's too, and it continues, right into modern S.F. "Cowboy vs. Indians" movies like "Avatar". But, be sure to keep religion in/out of debate on religion and movies, and everything else?



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

23 Dec 2011, 3:47 am

kxmode wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
kxmode wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
I wish I knew more about hinduism. But I always thought Avatar (the film) had its roots in paganism and worship of nature.


It does. Most religions in the world come from a single source because virtually all of them have common doctrines. I wrote more about that here: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp4229548.html#4229548


I just read your other post. Interesting but not sure what you say is the common source.


"Not merely Egyptians, Chaldeans, Phoenicians, Greeks and Romans, but also the Hindus, the Buddhists of China and of Thibet, the Goths, Anglo-Saxons, Druids, Mexicans and Peruvians, the Aborigines of Australia, and even the savages of the South Sea Islands, must have all derived their religious ideas from a common source and a common centre. Everywhere we find the most startling coincidences in rites, ceremonies, customs, traditions, and in the names and relations of their respective gods and goddesses." - The Worship of the Dead, London, 1904, page 3, by John Garnier


You think I should buy the book? I would say the sun is the best candidate for the common source, or at least early humanities ideas about the sun. The reason for the similarities throughout the world are probably down to the fact we all stemmed from a common group of humans who made their way out of africa. It shows that from a very early period we told stories and passed on information. Then after seperating out across the world these stores gradually changed, becoming more elaborate until eventually writing was invented and the stories were written down.



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

23 Dec 2011, 3:52 am

ruveyn wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
I wish I knew more about hinduism. But I always thought Avatar (the film) had its roots in paganism and worship of nature.


The Hindus have 36,000,000 gods. Lots of fun.

ruveyn


How do they know which one to worship? Do they all have one each?



91
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,063
Location: Australia

23 Dec 2011, 4:02 am

kxmode wrote:
Thank you for sharing that Artrat. Can you source those statements? I'd like to read The Vatican's official response.


The Vatican made no official statement on the subject, the Vatican City newspaper and radio station gave it a bad review calling it 'bland'. They also criticized the religious message of the film, saying that instead of treating nature as a creation to be protected, it becomes something to be worshiped. It is worth establishing that neither the Vatican City radio station nor the newspaper speak for the Vatican in any official capacity, except when they publish documents or air statements and these are specifically cited.


_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

23 Dec 2011, 4:08 am

kxmode wrote:
@Master_Pedant - I am simply showing what I thought to be similarities between the film and the Hindu religion.


Except said response wasn't to you, it was to Artrat - who, in term, was paraphrasing what he claims the Vatican said. The post was a more general response to the claims that Avatar was explicitly Pagan - a claim I wanted to contextualize (it's "pagan" in the sense of displaying how ridiculously far from the actual reality are earth would have to be for paganism to be right) ever since I saw the first Avatar thread, where Orwell (the bearded Irish-Ohioan-Floridan liberal Calvinist, not the British author) made some comment about pagan undertones.

kxmode wrote:
Every thread I start ends up turning into a theism vs atheism debate. This is PPR. The "R" means Religion. Yes, that means we are discussing religion... not atheism. If you want to start another theism vs atheism thread, start one. You can seed it using your comment above! But please don't hijack my threads anymore. I think it's really disrespectful to keep doing this. This message goes to all of you PPR regulars that keep doing this.

I also call on all PPR Moderators to please ask those who are constantly hijacking thread topics to stop it. It's not fair.


Unjustly accusing people of derailing threads, when it's clear what comment they're responding to, is VERY unfair. Unfair and factually wrong.


_________________
http://www.voterocky.org/


artrat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,269
Location: The Butthole of the American Empire

23 Dec 2011, 4:30 am

kxmode wrote:
Thank you for sharing that Artrat. Can you source those statements? I'd like to read The Vatican's official response.

P.S. As a side note The Vatican is a part of Hinduism as Hinduism is part of paganism. They are all flavors of the same type, all spawned from a single source: Babylonia.


Here is proof that a vatican condemns a film that is obviously fantasy. This is not from a theist or atheist website.
Vatican fears Avatar

I don't have the Vatican's official response about their opinion on a film but this is a reliable news source.


_________________
?During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" ~George Orwell

"I belive in God, only I spell it Nature."
~ Frank Llyod Wright


phil777
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,825
Location: Montreal, Québec

23 Dec 2011, 4:48 am

Robdemanc wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:
I wish I knew more about hinduism. But I always thought Avatar (the film) had its roots in paganism and worship of nature.


The Hindus have 36,000,000 gods. Lots of fun.

ruveyn


How do they know which one to worship? Do they all have one each?


They pick the one they feel associates most with them such as a policeman worshipping Hanuman (the perfect devotee and the most duty-bound god), or it can be a situational prayer, such as students praying Ganesha to get good exam results (he is the remover of obstacles ^.- ). Still, there are at the very least 3 major cults in Hinduism : Shiva's, Vishnu's and Durga's. (The latter one can be a bit dangerous, they're the ones typically shown in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, they get spiritual power from "breaking" rules)



kxmode
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,613
Location: In your neighborhood, knocking on your door. :)

23 Dec 2011, 5:28 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
Unjustly accusing people of derailing threads, when it's clear what comment they're responding to, is VERY unfair. Unfair and factually wrong.


You simply stated "Alternative view:" then posted a really long quote from http://commonsenseatheism.com/?p=6947 that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Stop posting atheistic comments in a theistic thread. There's nothing "unjust" about making that request.