truth15ful wrote:
So you think people are preaching Christianity for their own personal gain... Then consider this: Jesus Himself was betrayed by those who would go on to be the highest authorities of the early church. The Bible used women as some of the first eyewitnesses to Jesus's works at a time when women's testimonies were not considered reliable. There are always some people who are being persecuted because they follow God and nobody else. Time and time again, Christianity finds itself in opposition to other authorities, and it is in fact these times which prove most beneficial for the church.
And it is a fallacy to say that because Christianity gives people comfort and tells them that they are safe, that somehow makes it false or needing to be rejected. True, it is a problem when people believe Christianity only for these reasons or focus on them when they try to evangelize to people, but that is the very thing I am trying to work against.
No, most people believe in the very fundamental roots of christianity. Since the 1930's, however, America, and thus Christianity, has been overcome by demagogues (think Leo Strauss). Intended with this is the mixture of politics with those same roots that most people believe. Morality becomes an oxymoron. "One Nation, Under God" has taken to mean we do no evil, for instance in South America. Is it right for us to assassinate elected leaders so that we can install those who will work with us better? No, but you talk to most southern Christians and they either don't care or question the higher purpose in it. Faith alone is absolutely nuts, you just throw some ideas under the namebrand "Jesus" and they don't question what your selling. These days it has nothing to do with the "good works of Jesus" it's about how you package Him and his good works with socio-political policies that are just flat amoral. What I'm saying is religions like Christianity train the mind to think in a certain way that lacks better judgement. Prior to the 1930's most if not all religious organisation stood apart from American politics. Political mobility started after the Great Depression, and has steadily risen since then. The ideas you seem to convey existed in America for the first 175 years. But in truth religion was more a community ideal, rather than one which should be spread on soapboxes.
I can't agree with the idea that you need a false understanding of the world to cope with it. You don't need any higher understanding to "cope". And I'm not saying that because it gives reassurance, that is why it is false. I'm saying it is false and the hope it gives is hollow and a waste of one's mental resources to truly overcome what ails them.