Misslizard wrote:
^^^^^^Ive seen animals that were a lot more sapient than some humans.
And of course they are sentient beings.
I have crows in the yard that are more sensible and pleasant to be around than a lot of people.
But I do agree that a good porterhouse is tasty.
But I try not to harm anything,even bugs have the right to crawl around.
If other animals were sapient (having wisdom), I think we would have heard about it by now. That would be a scientific breakthrough.
No, most animals are not sentient by a reasonable definition. I define sentience as self-awareness, which most animals appear to lack. Not very many animals can pass the mirror self-recognition test. Only hominids and a few others can.
I know that the animal rights people define sentient as being able to feel pain, but that renders the term meaningless, as most members of the animal kingdom can feel pain.
Humans, as far as we know, are the
only sapient species on the planet. However, I am willing to accept that the lower hominids may be sentient.
I'm skeptical of the mirror test. Considering all the mythology that surrounds mirrors, I question wether some primitive human cultures understood they were looking at their reflection. To me a better test of sentience would be wether or not an animal can make a decision based on past experience, as this would require remembering what happened to it and judging what it should or should not do. It is my under standing that most, if not all, mammals and birds are capable of doing this.