Apple_in_my_Eye wrote:
Quote:
And while they all just stood around and waited for the fire department, what kind of police officer wouldn’t try and save a 3-year-old burning in a house?” said sister-in-law Emily Miller.
Potential problems, there. How long did they wait, and was the house really too dangerous to go into at the time he was tazed? Are the police expert enough with fires to judge when it's not safe to got in? Do they tend to be too cautious about going in and too quick & heavy-handed in subduing a person when it might not be necessary (because they do that all the time)?
If those cops got it wrong they should to be glad some of the guy's kids survived, otherwise he might have no reason to live and a lot of rage.
I would like to know the order of things. Basically, when you see that FF can't enter a structure in gear, no one in street clothes could. In the fire department, we have a saving, "Risk a lot to save a lot, risk a little to save a little, risk nothing to save nothing." If it's so hot we can't enter, the odds of there being someone alive are so low that it's not worth risking our lives unless we know there is someone alive.
It's a tough question, do you allow someone to commit suicide for a (prob) dead kid?