glebel wrote:
All crimes involving violence are, to me, hate crimes.
What about crimes of passion? There's usually hurt, betrayal, jealousy... but not so much hate in the terms of someone killing a trans person because of who/what they are. There's a completely different mindset and that's why they have the various classifications.
ScrewyWabbit wrote:
One man's terror attack is another man's justifiable resistance to oppression or some other perceived wrong-doing. If there are Muslim terrorists, or Jewish terrorists, or Christian terrorists is pretty much dependent on who's doing the counting and what they count as a terror attack, and what they don't.
This is definitely true. The founders of the USA could easily be considered terrorists, same with the Irish rebels (dad always joked that I grew up listening to terrorist music). It's sometimes hard to say whether something was an oppressed people striving for freedom of some sort vs a radical who was completely insane (because usually, in their heads, they're the good guys).
There are some instances, however, where it's seems an obvious act of terror, such as with Burundi's Mr. Rwasa:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/obadias-ndaba/burundis-turmoil_b_8143230.html wrote:
Mr. Rwasa's militiamen created a sick diversion before attacking the refugee camp. His men came in singing gospel songs, a survivor told me. God had given them easy prey, they said. In Kirundi, they sang that they were "the army of God", not much dissimilar from what the Islamic State is doing in Iraq and Syria.
_________________
Your Aspie score: 171 of 200
Your Neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 40 of 200