VegetableMan wrote:
No, WP certainly isn't becoming a "conservative echo chamber." It's just that hared of Trump has created a political climate where any criticism of anti-Trump rhetoric will immediately get you branded a conservative or Republican. If you question Russia collusion, then you must be a Trump supporter. Obviously, that has been the nature of politics for a very long time, but it's gotten much worse over the past two years.
Bipolar Thinking: "If not X then Y", "If not for us, then against us", "If not perfect, then worthless" and so forth.
Strange thing about those labels ... "Democrat" and "Republican" are just labels of declared political affiliation, while "Liberal" and "Conservative" indicate your perspectives on certain topics.
For the sake of argument, I'll go by the following definitions.
Liberals believe in...
... government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all.
... government duty to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights.
... the government's role should be to guarantee that no one is in need.
... a general emphasis on the need for the government to solve problems.
Conservatives believe in...
... personal responsibility
... limited government
... free markets
... individual liberty
... traditional American values (e.g., Life, Liberty, Persuit of Happiness, Nuclear Family, et cetera)
... a strong national defense
... the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals.
... generally emphasize empowerment of the
individual to solve problems (esp., their own).
Note that these beliefs are often seen as "All or Nothing" doctrine, when it is actually possible to be a fiscal conservative ("balance the budget") and a social liberal ("protect civil rights"), for example. There are some die-hards who believe that anyone who is a Conservative (or Liberal) simply MUST must be a Conservative (or Liberal) in every aspect, or that person is a Liberal (or Conservative) through and through. This is false thinking, since a person's identity may not be a reflection of their true nature, and vice-versa.
So it is possible for a person to
identify as a Liberal, while also being a member of the Republican party, for example. Such a person might be "closeted" while working quietly to soften the rhetoric of the GOP hard-liners. A closet Conservative in the Democratic party might agree with a progressive agenda, but only if is undertaken slowly, carefully, and with an eye to respecting the less odious of the "Traditional Values".
It's more complex than "Conservative == Republican == Right-Wing" and "Left-Wing == Liberal == Democrat".
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.