Page 2 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

25 Nov 2007, 9:43 am

i like the zoroastrian religion



nominalist
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

25 Nov 2007, 10:24 am

The approach indicated in this Google video falls under what is generally called astrotheology.

The problem I have with this approach is its metaphysics (or speculations). It assumes, without evidence, that similarities in narrative are identical with similarities in message. In other words, because a similar allegory was used at various times in the past, can we then conclude that that the thoughts behind the narrative were similar?

Pointing to the Zodiac was a common way of illustrating a variety of experiences in the ancient world. However, because various stories used common symbolisms, does that tell us that the experiences behind the symbols were also common? I don't think we can make that assumption.


_________________
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. (retired tenured sociology professor)
36 domains/24 books: http://www.markfoster.net
Emancipated Autism: http://www.neurelitism.com
Institute for Dialectical metaRealism: http://dmr.institute