The approach indicated in this Google video falls under what is generally called astrotheology.
The problem I have with this approach is its metaphysics (or speculations). It assumes, without evidence, that similarities in narrative are identical with similarities in message. In other words, because a similar allegory was used at various times in the past, can we then conclude that that the thoughts behind the narrative were similar?
Pointing to the Zodiac was a common way of illustrating a variety of experiences in the ancient world. However, because various stories used common symbolisms, does that tell us that the experiences behind the symbols were also common? I don't think we can make that assumption.